Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic

M. Justin Byron, Michelle Jeong, David Abrams, Noel T. Brewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The USA is considering a very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette standard. We sought to characterise the prevalence and correlates of the incorrect belief that VLNC cigarettes are less carcinogenic than current cigarettes, as this could reduce motivation to quit. Methods: Participants were a nationally representative sample of 650 adult smokers in the USA. In 2015-2016, before the VLNC proposal became public, these smokers took part in an online survey. We used multivariate weighted analyses to calculate ORs and percentages and a ‡2 test to examine the association between variables. Results: Overall, 47.1% of smokers believed that smoking VLNC cigarettes for 30 years would be less likely to cause cancer than smoking current cigarettes. This misperception was more common among smokers who were aged above 55 (56.6%) and black (57.4%). Additionally, 23.9% of smokers reported they would be less likely to quit if the USA adopted a VLNC standard. Thinking that VLNC cigarettes would be less carcinogenic was associated with smokers reporting they would be less likely to quit (P<0.01). Conclusions: Many smokers had the misperception that smoking VLNC cigarettes is less likely to cause cancer, and some stated that they would be less likely to quit. A VLNC standard may be more effective if accompanied by a communication campaign that emphasises the continued dangers of smoking VLNC cigarettes due to the many toxic chemicals in smoke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTobacco Control
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 23 2018

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Tobacco Products
nicotine
smoking
Smoking
cancer
cause
Poisons
online survey
Smoke
Motivation
Neoplasms
Multivariate Analysis
campaign
Communication
communication

Keywords

  • cessation
  • harm reduction
  • nicotine
  • public opinion
  • public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic. / Byron, M. Justin; Jeong, Michelle; Abrams, David; Brewer, Noel T.

In: Tobacco Control, 23.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c65cac373974671b30690fda22c58e7,
title = "Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic",
abstract = "Objective: The USA is considering a very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette standard. We sought to characterise the prevalence and correlates of the incorrect belief that VLNC cigarettes are less carcinogenic than current cigarettes, as this could reduce motivation to quit. Methods: Participants were a nationally representative sample of 650 adult smokers in the USA. In 2015-2016, before the VLNC proposal became public, these smokers took part in an online survey. We used multivariate weighted analyses to calculate ORs and percentages and a ‡2 test to examine the association between variables. Results: Overall, 47.1{\%} of smokers believed that smoking VLNC cigarettes for 30 years would be less likely to cause cancer than smoking current cigarettes. This misperception was more common among smokers who were aged above 55 (56.6{\%}) and black (57.4{\%}). Additionally, 23.9{\%} of smokers reported they would be less likely to quit if the USA adopted a VLNC standard. Thinking that VLNC cigarettes would be less carcinogenic was associated with smokers reporting they would be less likely to quit (P<0.01). Conclusions: Many smokers had the misperception that smoking VLNC cigarettes is less likely to cause cancer, and some stated that they would be less likely to quit. A VLNC standard may be more effective if accompanied by a communication campaign that emphasises the continued dangers of smoking VLNC cigarettes due to the many toxic chemicals in smoke.",
keywords = "cessation, harm reduction, nicotine, public opinion, public policy",
author = "Byron, {M. Justin} and Michelle Jeong and David Abrams and Brewer, {Noel T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054124",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic

AU - Byron, M. Justin

AU - Jeong, Michelle

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Brewer, Noel T.

PY - 2018/1/23

Y1 - 2018/1/23

N2 - Objective: The USA is considering a very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette standard. We sought to characterise the prevalence and correlates of the incorrect belief that VLNC cigarettes are less carcinogenic than current cigarettes, as this could reduce motivation to quit. Methods: Participants were a nationally representative sample of 650 adult smokers in the USA. In 2015-2016, before the VLNC proposal became public, these smokers took part in an online survey. We used multivariate weighted analyses to calculate ORs and percentages and a ‡2 test to examine the association between variables. Results: Overall, 47.1% of smokers believed that smoking VLNC cigarettes for 30 years would be less likely to cause cancer than smoking current cigarettes. This misperception was more common among smokers who were aged above 55 (56.6%) and black (57.4%). Additionally, 23.9% of smokers reported they would be less likely to quit if the USA adopted a VLNC standard. Thinking that VLNC cigarettes would be less carcinogenic was associated with smokers reporting they would be less likely to quit (P<0.01). Conclusions: Many smokers had the misperception that smoking VLNC cigarettes is less likely to cause cancer, and some stated that they would be less likely to quit. A VLNC standard may be more effective if accompanied by a communication campaign that emphasises the continued dangers of smoking VLNC cigarettes due to the many toxic chemicals in smoke.

AB - Objective: The USA is considering a very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette standard. We sought to characterise the prevalence and correlates of the incorrect belief that VLNC cigarettes are less carcinogenic than current cigarettes, as this could reduce motivation to quit. Methods: Participants were a nationally representative sample of 650 adult smokers in the USA. In 2015-2016, before the VLNC proposal became public, these smokers took part in an online survey. We used multivariate weighted analyses to calculate ORs and percentages and a ‡2 test to examine the association between variables. Results: Overall, 47.1% of smokers believed that smoking VLNC cigarettes for 30 years would be less likely to cause cancer than smoking current cigarettes. This misperception was more common among smokers who were aged above 55 (56.6%) and black (57.4%). Additionally, 23.9% of smokers reported they would be less likely to quit if the USA adopted a VLNC standard. Thinking that VLNC cigarettes would be less carcinogenic was associated with smokers reporting they would be less likely to quit (P<0.01). Conclusions: Many smokers had the misperception that smoking VLNC cigarettes is less likely to cause cancer, and some stated that they would be less likely to quit. A VLNC standard may be more effective if accompanied by a communication campaign that emphasises the continued dangers of smoking VLNC cigarettes due to the many toxic chemicals in smoke.

KW - cessation

KW - harm reduction

KW - nicotine

KW - public opinion

KW - public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049165097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049165097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054124

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054124

M3 - Article

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

ER -