Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work revisited

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Harvey Dean (1998) rejects my (Wakefield, 1988a; 1988b) argument that minimal distributive justice is the essential mission of social work and that treatment of mental disorder is not part of the profession’s essential mission but rather a derived task. He argues that social work has broader ethical aims that encompass both pursuit of justice and treatment of mental disorder. In this article, 1 review my earlier position and respond to Dean’s objections. I argue that Dean’s narrativist account of the profession’s ethical aims is overly broad and that he confuses non-disordered psychological problems with mental disorders. I conclude that neither my “minimal distributive justice” view of social work’s mission nor my exclusion of treatment of mental disorder from the profession’s essential mission are disconfirmed by Dean’s arguments.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)25-57
    Number of pages33
    JournalSmith College Studies in Social Work
    Volume69
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

    Fingerprint

    distributive justice
    mental disorder
    psychotherapy
    social work
    profession
    exclusion
    justice

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work revisited. / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Smith College Studies in Social Work, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 25-57.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{30dd283884784bc08b8184b1347a72f0,
    title = "Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work revisited",
    abstract = "Harvey Dean (1998) rejects my (Wakefield, 1988a; 1988b) argument that minimal distributive justice is the essential mission of social work and that treatment of mental disorder is not part of the profession’s essential mission but rather a derived task. He argues that social work has broader ethical aims that encompass both pursuit of justice and treatment of mental disorder. In this article, 1 review my earlier position and respond to Dean’s objections. I argue that Dean’s narrativist account of the profession’s ethical aims is overly broad and that he confuses non-disordered psychological problems with mental disorders. I conclude that neither my “minimal distributive justice” view of social work’s mission nor my exclusion of treatment of mental disorder from the profession’s essential mission are disconfirmed by Dean’s arguments.",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "1998",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/00377319809517542",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "69",
    pages = "25--57",
    journal = "Smith College Studies in Social Work",
    issn = "0037-7317",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work revisited

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 1998/1/1

    Y1 - 1998/1/1

    N2 - Harvey Dean (1998) rejects my (Wakefield, 1988a; 1988b) argument that minimal distributive justice is the essential mission of social work and that treatment of mental disorder is not part of the profession’s essential mission but rather a derived task. He argues that social work has broader ethical aims that encompass both pursuit of justice and treatment of mental disorder. In this article, 1 review my earlier position and respond to Dean’s objections. I argue that Dean’s narrativist account of the profession’s ethical aims is overly broad and that he confuses non-disordered psychological problems with mental disorders. I conclude that neither my “minimal distributive justice” view of social work’s mission nor my exclusion of treatment of mental disorder from the profession’s essential mission are disconfirmed by Dean’s arguments.

    AB - Harvey Dean (1998) rejects my (Wakefield, 1988a; 1988b) argument that minimal distributive justice is the essential mission of social work and that treatment of mental disorder is not part of the profession’s essential mission but rather a derived task. He argues that social work has broader ethical aims that encompass both pursuit of justice and treatment of mental disorder. In this article, 1 review my earlier position and respond to Dean’s objections. I argue that Dean’s narrativist account of the profession’s ethical aims is overly broad and that he confuses non-disordered psychological problems with mental disorders. I conclude that neither my “minimal distributive justice” view of social work’s mission nor my exclusion of treatment of mental disorder from the profession’s essential mission are disconfirmed by Dean’s arguments.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032257547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032257547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/00377319809517542

    DO - 10.1080/00377319809517542

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0032257547

    VL - 69

    SP - 25

    EP - 57

    JO - Smith College Studies in Social Work

    JF - Smith College Studies in Social Work

    SN - 0037-7317

    IS - 1

    ER -