Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011

Mei R. Fu, Sheila H. Ridner, Sophia H. Hu, Bob R. Stewart, Janice N. Cormier, Jane M. Armer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer-reviewed literature published from 2004 to 2011 on the psychosocial impact of lymphedema. Methods Eleven electronic databases were searched and 1311 articles retrieved; 23 met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles utilized qualitative methodology and 11 used quantitative methodology. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results The overall quality of the 23 included studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of psychosocial impact. Quantitative studies showed statistically significant poorer social well-being in persons with lymphedema, including perceptions related to body image, appearance, sexuality, and social barriers. No statistically significant differences were found between persons with and without lymphedema in the domains of emotional well-being (happy or sad) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). All 12 of the qualitative studies consistently described negative psychological impact (negative self-identity, emotional disturbance, and psychological distress) and negative social impact (marginalization, financial burden, perceived diminished sexuality, social isolation, perceived social abandonment, public insensitivity, and non-supportive work environment). Factors associated with psychosocial impact were also identified. Conclusions Lymphedema has a negative psychosocial impact on affected individuals. The current review sheds light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the definitions of psychosocial impact with respect to lymphedema. Development of a lymphedema-specific instrument is needed to better characterize the impact of lymphedema and to examine the factors contributing to these outcomes in cancer and non-cancer-related populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1466-1484
Number of pages19
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Sexuality
Psychology
Social Marginalization
Social Isolation
Affective Symptoms
Body Image
Social Change
Anxiety
Databases
Depression
Population
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • cancer
  • lymphedema
  • oncology
  • psychological distress
  • psychosocial
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Fu, M. R., Ridner, S. H., Hu, S. H., Stewart, B. R., Cormier, J. N., & Armer, J. M. (2013). Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. Psycho-Oncology, 22(7), 1466-1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3201

Psychosocial impact of lymphedema : A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. / Fu, Mei R.; Ridner, Sheila H.; Hu, Sophia H.; Stewart, Bob R.; Cormier, Janice N.; Armer, Jane M.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 22, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 1466-1484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fu, MR, Ridner, SH, Hu, SH, Stewart, BR, Cormier, JN & Armer, JM 2013, 'Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011', Psycho-Oncology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1466-1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3201
Fu, Mei R. ; Ridner, Sheila H. ; Hu, Sophia H. ; Stewart, Bob R. ; Cormier, Janice N. ; Armer, Jane M. / Psychosocial impact of lymphedema : A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. In: Psycho-Oncology. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 1466-1484.
@article{57b359f5592643b9a44fff7009fbe7f2,
title = "Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011",
abstract = "Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer-reviewed literature published from 2004 to 2011 on the psychosocial impact of lymphedema. Methods Eleven electronic databases were searched and 1311 articles retrieved; 23 met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles utilized qualitative methodology and 11 used quantitative methodology. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results The overall quality of the 23 included studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of psychosocial impact. Quantitative studies showed statistically significant poorer social well-being in persons with lymphedema, including perceptions related to body image, appearance, sexuality, and social barriers. No statistically significant differences were found between persons with and without lymphedema in the domains of emotional well-being (happy or sad) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). All 12 of the qualitative studies consistently described negative psychological impact (negative self-identity, emotional disturbance, and psychological distress) and negative social impact (marginalization, financial burden, perceived diminished sexuality, social isolation, perceived social abandonment, public insensitivity, and non-supportive work environment). Factors associated with psychosocial impact were also identified. Conclusions Lymphedema has a negative psychosocial impact on affected individuals. The current review sheds light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the definitions of psychosocial impact with respect to lymphedema. Development of a lymphedema-specific instrument is needed to better characterize the impact of lymphedema and to examine the factors contributing to these outcomes in cancer and non-cancer-related populations.",
keywords = "cancer, lymphedema, oncology, psychological distress, psychosocial, systematic review",
author = "Fu, {Mei R.} and Ridner, {Sheila H.} and Hu, {Sophia H.} and Stewart, {Bob R.} and Cormier, {Janice N.} and Armer, {Jane M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/pon.3201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1466--1484",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial impact of lymphedema

T2 - A systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011

AU - Fu, Mei R.

AU - Ridner, Sheila H.

AU - Hu, Sophia H.

AU - Stewart, Bob R.

AU - Cormier, Janice N.

AU - Armer, Jane M.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer-reviewed literature published from 2004 to 2011 on the psychosocial impact of lymphedema. Methods Eleven electronic databases were searched and 1311 articles retrieved; 23 met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles utilized qualitative methodology and 11 used quantitative methodology. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results The overall quality of the 23 included studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of psychosocial impact. Quantitative studies showed statistically significant poorer social well-being in persons with lymphedema, including perceptions related to body image, appearance, sexuality, and social barriers. No statistically significant differences were found between persons with and without lymphedema in the domains of emotional well-being (happy or sad) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). All 12 of the qualitative studies consistently described negative psychological impact (negative self-identity, emotional disturbance, and psychological distress) and negative social impact (marginalization, financial burden, perceived diminished sexuality, social isolation, perceived social abandonment, public insensitivity, and non-supportive work environment). Factors associated with psychosocial impact were also identified. Conclusions Lymphedema has a negative psychosocial impact on affected individuals. The current review sheds light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the definitions of psychosocial impact with respect to lymphedema. Development of a lymphedema-specific instrument is needed to better characterize the impact of lymphedema and to examine the factors contributing to these outcomes in cancer and non-cancer-related populations.

AB - Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer-reviewed literature published from 2004 to 2011 on the psychosocial impact of lymphedema. Methods Eleven electronic databases were searched and 1311 articles retrieved; 23 met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles utilized qualitative methodology and 11 used quantitative methodology. An established quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results The overall quality of the 23 included studies was adequate. A critical limitation of current literature is the lack of conceptual or operational definitions for the concept of psychosocial impact. Quantitative studies showed statistically significant poorer social well-being in persons with lymphedema, including perceptions related to body image, appearance, sexuality, and social barriers. No statistically significant differences were found between persons with and without lymphedema in the domains of emotional well-being (happy or sad) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). All 12 of the qualitative studies consistently described negative psychological impact (negative self-identity, emotional disturbance, and psychological distress) and negative social impact (marginalization, financial burden, perceived diminished sexuality, social isolation, perceived social abandonment, public insensitivity, and non-supportive work environment). Factors associated with psychosocial impact were also identified. Conclusions Lymphedema has a negative psychosocial impact on affected individuals. The current review sheds light on the conceptualization and operationalization of the definitions of psychosocial impact with respect to lymphedema. Development of a lymphedema-specific instrument is needed to better characterize the impact of lymphedema and to examine the factors contributing to these outcomes in cancer and non-cancer-related populations.

KW - cancer

KW - lymphedema

KW - oncology

KW - psychological distress

KW - psychosocial

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879971386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879971386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.3201

DO - 10.1002/pon.3201

M3 - Article

C2 - 23044512

AN - SCOPUS:84879971386

VL - 22

SP - 1466

EP - 1484

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 7

ER -