Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision

Gordon E. Legge, Gary S. Rubin, Denis G. Pelli, Mary M. Schleske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Very little is known about the effects of visual impairment on reading. We used psychophysical methods to study reading by 16 low-vision observers. Reading rates were measured for text scanned across the face of a TV monitor while varying parameters that are likely to be important in low vision: angular character size, number of characters in the field, number of dots composing each character, contrast polarity (white-on-black vs black-on-white text), and character spacing. Despite diverse pathologies and degrees of vision loss in our sample, several major generalizations emerged. There is a wide variation in peak reading rates among low-vision observers, but 64% of the variance can be accounted for by two major distinctions: intact central fields vs central-field loss and cloudy vs clear ocular media. Peak reading rates for observers with central-field loss were very low (median 25 words/minute), while peak reading rates for observers with intact central fields were at least 90 words/minute (median 130 words/minute). Most low-vision readers require magnification to obtain characters of optimal size. Sloan M acuity was a better predictor of optimal character size than Snellen acuity, accounting for 72% of the variance. Low-vision reading is similar to normal reading in several respects. For example, both show the same dependence on the number of characters in the field. Our results provide estimates of the best reading performance to be expected from low-vision observers with characteristic forms of vision loss, and the stimulus parameters necessary for optimal performance. These results will be useful in the development of clinical tests of low vision, and in the design of low-vision reading aids.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-265
Number of pages13
JournalVision Research
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Psychophysics
Low Vision
Reading
Vision Disorders

Keywords

  • Acuity
  • Contrast
  • Low vision
  • Psychophysics
  • Reading
  • Visual field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision. / Legge, Gordon E.; Rubin, Gary S.; Pelli, Denis G.; Schleske, Mary M.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1985, p. 253-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Legge, GE, Rubin, GS, Pelli, DG & Schleske, MM 1985, 'Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision', Vision Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X
Legge, Gordon E. ; Rubin, Gary S. ; Pelli, Denis G. ; Schleske, Mary M. / Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision. In: Vision Research. 1985 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 253-265.
@article{792863b240aa43be83a88c1a74a5c294,
title = "Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision",
abstract = "Very little is known about the effects of visual impairment on reading. We used psychophysical methods to study reading by 16 low-vision observers. Reading rates were measured for text scanned across the face of a TV monitor while varying parameters that are likely to be important in low vision: angular character size, number of characters in the field, number of dots composing each character, contrast polarity (white-on-black vs black-on-white text), and character spacing. Despite diverse pathologies and degrees of vision loss in our sample, several major generalizations emerged. There is a wide variation in peak reading rates among low-vision observers, but 64{\%} of the variance can be accounted for by two major distinctions: intact central fields vs central-field loss and cloudy vs clear ocular media. Peak reading rates for observers with central-field loss were very low (median 25 words/minute), while peak reading rates for observers with intact central fields were at least 90 words/minute (median 130 words/minute). Most low-vision readers require magnification to obtain characters of optimal size. Sloan M acuity was a better predictor of optimal character size than Snellen acuity, accounting for 72{\%} of the variance. Low-vision reading is similar to normal reading in several respects. For example, both show the same dependence on the number of characters in the field. Our results provide estimates of the best reading performance to be expected from low-vision observers with characteristic forms of vision loss, and the stimulus parameters necessary for optimal performance. These results will be useful in the development of clinical tests of low vision, and in the design of low-vision reading aids.",
keywords = "Acuity, Contrast, Low vision, Psychophysics, Reading, Visual field",
author = "Legge, {Gordon E.} and Rubin, {Gary S.} and Pelli, {Denis G.} and Schleske, {Mary M.}",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "253--265",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision

AU - Legge, Gordon E.

AU - Rubin, Gary S.

AU - Pelli, Denis G.

AU - Schleske, Mary M.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Very little is known about the effects of visual impairment on reading. We used psychophysical methods to study reading by 16 low-vision observers. Reading rates were measured for text scanned across the face of a TV monitor while varying parameters that are likely to be important in low vision: angular character size, number of characters in the field, number of dots composing each character, contrast polarity (white-on-black vs black-on-white text), and character spacing. Despite diverse pathologies and degrees of vision loss in our sample, several major generalizations emerged. There is a wide variation in peak reading rates among low-vision observers, but 64% of the variance can be accounted for by two major distinctions: intact central fields vs central-field loss and cloudy vs clear ocular media. Peak reading rates for observers with central-field loss were very low (median 25 words/minute), while peak reading rates for observers with intact central fields were at least 90 words/minute (median 130 words/minute). Most low-vision readers require magnification to obtain characters of optimal size. Sloan M acuity was a better predictor of optimal character size than Snellen acuity, accounting for 72% of the variance. Low-vision reading is similar to normal reading in several respects. For example, both show the same dependence on the number of characters in the field. Our results provide estimates of the best reading performance to be expected from low-vision observers with characteristic forms of vision loss, and the stimulus parameters necessary for optimal performance. These results will be useful in the development of clinical tests of low vision, and in the design of low-vision reading aids.

AB - Very little is known about the effects of visual impairment on reading. We used psychophysical methods to study reading by 16 low-vision observers. Reading rates were measured for text scanned across the face of a TV monitor while varying parameters that are likely to be important in low vision: angular character size, number of characters in the field, number of dots composing each character, contrast polarity (white-on-black vs black-on-white text), and character spacing. Despite diverse pathologies and degrees of vision loss in our sample, several major generalizations emerged. There is a wide variation in peak reading rates among low-vision observers, but 64% of the variance can be accounted for by two major distinctions: intact central fields vs central-field loss and cloudy vs clear ocular media. Peak reading rates for observers with central-field loss were very low (median 25 words/minute), while peak reading rates for observers with intact central fields were at least 90 words/minute (median 130 words/minute). Most low-vision readers require magnification to obtain characters of optimal size. Sloan M acuity was a better predictor of optimal character size than Snellen acuity, accounting for 72% of the variance. Low-vision reading is similar to normal reading in several respects. For example, both show the same dependence on the number of characters in the field. Our results provide estimates of the best reading performance to be expected from low-vision observers with characteristic forms of vision loss, and the stimulus parameters necessary for optimal performance. These results will be useful in the development of clinical tests of low vision, and in the design of low-vision reading aids.

KW - Acuity

KW - Contrast

KW - Low vision

KW - Psychophysics

KW - Reading

KW - Visual field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021999999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021999999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 253

EP - 265

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 2

ER -