Psychology’s Replication Crisis as Scientific Opportunity

A Précis for Policymakers

Joseph Lee Rodgers, Patrick Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Psychological science is in the midst of what has been referred to as a “replication crisis.” The realization that many individual findings do not replicate in new studies has led to questioning the scientific method and the integrity of psychological science. We review the history of the replication crisis, and its positive and negative effects. Most of the elements of the replication crisis are re-emergent issues that methodologists have studied in the past, but to which researchers have become increasingly sensitized. Ultimately, we argue the value of the replication crisis, in that it has led to positive self-examination within our science and to the development of new and innovative methodology. The field is emerging from the replication crisis with a realization of the importance of multiple replication efforts, and an improved ethic of openness and transparency in the conduct of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-141
Number of pages8
JournalPolicy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Self-Examination
Psychology
Ethics
science
History
Research Personnel
transparency
integrity
Research
moral philosophy
examination
methodology
history
Values

Keywords

  • Bayesian methods
  • meta-analysis
  • methodology
  • NHST
  • policymakers
  • replication crisis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Psychology’s Replication Crisis as Scientific Opportunity : A Précis for Policymakers. / Rodgers, Joseph Lee; Shrout, Patrick.

In: Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 134-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b8b3c1a669344e2e8ffe357aafe1a215,
title = "Psychology’s Replication Crisis as Scientific Opportunity: A Pr{\'e}cis for Policymakers",
abstract = "Psychological science is in the midst of what has been referred to as a “replication crisis.” The realization that many individual findings do not replicate in new studies has led to questioning the scientific method and the integrity of psychological science. We review the history of the replication crisis, and its positive and negative effects. Most of the elements of the replication crisis are re-emergent issues that methodologists have studied in the past, but to which researchers have become increasingly sensitized. Ultimately, we argue the value of the replication crisis, in that it has led to positive self-examination within our science and to the development of new and innovative methodology. The field is emerging from the replication crisis with a realization of the importance of multiple replication efforts, and an improved ethic of openness and transparency in the conduct of research.",
keywords = "Bayesian methods, meta-analysis, methodology, NHST, policymakers, replication crisis",
author = "Rodgers, {Joseph Lee} and Patrick Shrout",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2372732217749254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "134--141",
journal = "Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "2372-7322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychology’s Replication Crisis as Scientific Opportunity

T2 - A Précis for Policymakers

AU - Rodgers, Joseph Lee

AU - Shrout, Patrick

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Psychological science is in the midst of what has been referred to as a “replication crisis.” The realization that many individual findings do not replicate in new studies has led to questioning the scientific method and the integrity of psychological science. We review the history of the replication crisis, and its positive and negative effects. Most of the elements of the replication crisis are re-emergent issues that methodologists have studied in the past, but to which researchers have become increasingly sensitized. Ultimately, we argue the value of the replication crisis, in that it has led to positive self-examination within our science and to the development of new and innovative methodology. The field is emerging from the replication crisis with a realization of the importance of multiple replication efforts, and an improved ethic of openness and transparency in the conduct of research.

AB - Psychological science is in the midst of what has been referred to as a “replication crisis.” The realization that many individual findings do not replicate in new studies has led to questioning the scientific method and the integrity of psychological science. We review the history of the replication crisis, and its positive and negative effects. Most of the elements of the replication crisis are re-emergent issues that methodologists have studied in the past, but to which researchers have become increasingly sensitized. Ultimately, we argue the value of the replication crisis, in that it has led to positive self-examination within our science and to the development of new and innovative methodology. The field is emerging from the replication crisis with a realization of the importance of multiple replication efforts, and an improved ethic of openness and transparency in the conduct of research.

KW - Bayesian methods

KW - meta-analysis

KW - methodology

KW - NHST

KW - policymakers

KW - replication crisis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056737011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056737011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2372732217749254

DO - 10.1177/2372732217749254

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

SP - 134

EP - 141

JO - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 2372-7322

IS - 1

ER -