Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict

Rezarta Bilali, Ayşe Betül Çelik, Ekin Ok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigated the psychological asymmetry of majority and minority intergroup attitudes at different conflict stages: high versus low intensity conflict. Cross-sectional surveys using the same outcome measures were conducted at two time points with representative Kurdish and Turkish community samples in selected neighborhoods in the city of Izmir in Turkey. The first survey was conducted during a period of low intensity conflict (LIC), whereas the second survey was conducted 6 months later during a period of high intensity conflict (HIC). The results revealed seemingly paradoxical outcomes among minority Kurds, such that during HIC they exhibited higher social distance and less support for (Turkish) nationalistic leaders, but also higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism, less out-group negativity, and lower support for minority Kurdish rights. By contrast, Turks exhibited lower social tolerance, more support for nationalistic leaders, higher out-group negativity, lower support for minority rights, and higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism during HIC than LIC. Turks' and Kurds' images of each other were also assessed, revealing patterns consistent with image theory predictions: Turks viewed Kurds as rogue, whereas Kurds viewed Turks as barbarian. While Turks' out-group images did not change over time, Kurds' images of Turks were slightly more variable at HIC than LIC. The findings are interpreted in light of distinct challenges that conflict and violence at the national level poses to ethnic minorities and majorities. The results highlight the importance of considering the role of dynamic inter-group contexts on understanding micro-level intergroup outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-264
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations
Volume43
Issue numberPB
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

ethnic conflict
asymmetry
minority
Psychology
Turk
Kurd
outgroup
minority rights
nationalism
Conflict (Psychology)
Ethnic Violence
Psychological
Ethnic conflict
Minorities
Asymmetry
leader
Social Distance
ethnic structure
social distance
Turkey

Keywords

  • Ethnic conflict
  • Image theory
  • Minority groups
  • Social distance
  • Threat
  • Tolerance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict. / Bilali, Rezarta; Çelik, Ayşe Betül; Ok, Ekin.

In: International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 43, No. PB, 2014, p. 253-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f078a55a83a4908a5d9766c14078037,
title = "Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict",
abstract = "This study investigated the psychological asymmetry of majority and minority intergroup attitudes at different conflict stages: high versus low intensity conflict. Cross-sectional surveys using the same outcome measures were conducted at two time points with representative Kurdish and Turkish community samples in selected neighborhoods in the city of Izmir in Turkey. The first survey was conducted during a period of low intensity conflict (LIC), whereas the second survey was conducted 6 months later during a period of high intensity conflict (HIC). The results revealed seemingly paradoxical outcomes among minority Kurds, such that during HIC they exhibited higher social distance and less support for (Turkish) nationalistic leaders, but also higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism, less out-group negativity, and lower support for minority Kurdish rights. By contrast, Turks exhibited lower social tolerance, more support for nationalistic leaders, higher out-group negativity, lower support for minority rights, and higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism during HIC than LIC. Turks' and Kurds' images of each other were also assessed, revealing patterns consistent with image theory predictions: Turks viewed Kurds as rogue, whereas Kurds viewed Turks as barbarian. While Turks' out-group images did not change over time, Kurds' images of Turks were slightly more variable at HIC than LIC. The findings are interpreted in light of distinct challenges that conflict and violence at the national level poses to ethnic minorities and majorities. The results highlight the importance of considering the role of dynamic inter-group contexts on understanding micro-level intergroup outcomes.",
keywords = "Ethnic conflict, Image theory, Minority groups, Social distance, Threat, Tolerance",
author = "Rezarta Bilali and {\cC}elik, {Ayşe Bet{\"u}l} and Ekin Ok",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "253--264",
journal = "International Journal of Intercultural Relations",
issn = "0147-1767",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "PB",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict

AU - Bilali, Rezarta

AU - Çelik, Ayşe Betül

AU - Ok, Ekin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This study investigated the psychological asymmetry of majority and minority intergroup attitudes at different conflict stages: high versus low intensity conflict. Cross-sectional surveys using the same outcome measures were conducted at two time points with representative Kurdish and Turkish community samples in selected neighborhoods in the city of Izmir in Turkey. The first survey was conducted during a period of low intensity conflict (LIC), whereas the second survey was conducted 6 months later during a period of high intensity conflict (HIC). The results revealed seemingly paradoxical outcomes among minority Kurds, such that during HIC they exhibited higher social distance and less support for (Turkish) nationalistic leaders, but also higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism, less out-group negativity, and lower support for minority Kurdish rights. By contrast, Turks exhibited lower social tolerance, more support for nationalistic leaders, higher out-group negativity, lower support for minority rights, and higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism during HIC than LIC. Turks' and Kurds' images of each other were also assessed, revealing patterns consistent with image theory predictions: Turks viewed Kurds as rogue, whereas Kurds viewed Turks as barbarian. While Turks' out-group images did not change over time, Kurds' images of Turks were slightly more variable at HIC than LIC. The findings are interpreted in light of distinct challenges that conflict and violence at the national level poses to ethnic minorities and majorities. The results highlight the importance of considering the role of dynamic inter-group contexts on understanding micro-level intergroup outcomes.

AB - This study investigated the psychological asymmetry of majority and minority intergroup attitudes at different conflict stages: high versus low intensity conflict. Cross-sectional surveys using the same outcome measures were conducted at two time points with representative Kurdish and Turkish community samples in selected neighborhoods in the city of Izmir in Turkey. The first survey was conducted during a period of low intensity conflict (LIC), whereas the second survey was conducted 6 months later during a period of high intensity conflict (HIC). The results revealed seemingly paradoxical outcomes among minority Kurds, such that during HIC they exhibited higher social distance and less support for (Turkish) nationalistic leaders, but also higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism, less out-group negativity, and lower support for minority Kurdish rights. By contrast, Turks exhibited lower social tolerance, more support for nationalistic leaders, higher out-group negativity, lower support for minority rights, and higher endorsement of assimilative nationalism during HIC than LIC. Turks' and Kurds' images of each other were also assessed, revealing patterns consistent with image theory predictions: Turks viewed Kurds as rogue, whereas Kurds viewed Turks as barbarian. While Turks' out-group images did not change over time, Kurds' images of Turks were slightly more variable at HIC than LIC. The findings are interpreted in light of distinct challenges that conflict and violence at the national level poses to ethnic minorities and majorities. The results highlight the importance of considering the role of dynamic inter-group contexts on understanding micro-level intergroup outcomes.

KW - Ethnic conflict

KW - Image theory

KW - Minority groups

KW - Social distance

KW - Threat

KW - Tolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922727145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922727145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922727145

VL - 43

SP - 253

EP - 264

JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

SN - 0147-1767

IS - PB

ER -