Proximity judgments in color space: Tests of a Euclidean color geometry

Sophie M. Wuerger, Laurence Maloney, John Krauskopf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We describe two tests of the hypothesis that human judgments of the proximity of colors are consistent with a Euclidean geometry on color matching space. The first test uses proximity judgments to measure the angle between any two intersecting lines in color space. Pairwise estimates of the angles between three lines in a plane were made in order to test the additivity of angles. Three different color proximity tasks were considered. Additivity failed for each of the three proximity tasks. Secondly, we tested a prediction concerning the growth of the variability of judgments of similarity with the distance between the test and reference stimuli. The Euclidean hypothesis was also rejected by this test. The results concerning the growth of variability are consistent with the assumption that observers use a city-block metric when judging the proximity of colored lights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)827-835
Number of pages9
JournalVision Research
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Color
Growth
Light

Keywords

  • Color geometry
  • Color similarity
  • Euclidean geometry
  • Salience of colors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Proximity judgments in color space : Tests of a Euclidean color geometry. / Wuerger, Sophie M.; Maloney, Laurence; Krauskopf, John.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1995, p. 827-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wuerger, Sophie M. ; Maloney, Laurence ; Krauskopf, John. / Proximity judgments in color space : Tests of a Euclidean color geometry. In: Vision Research. 1995 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 827-835.
@article{41127181d19a460696294596334a8be4,
title = "Proximity judgments in color space: Tests of a Euclidean color geometry",
abstract = "We describe two tests of the hypothesis that human judgments of the proximity of colors are consistent with a Euclidean geometry on color matching space. The first test uses proximity judgments to measure the angle between any two intersecting lines in color space. Pairwise estimates of the angles between three lines in a plane were made in order to test the additivity of angles. Three different color proximity tasks were considered. Additivity failed for each of the three proximity tasks. Secondly, we tested a prediction concerning the growth of the variability of judgments of similarity with the distance between the test and reference stimuli. The Euclidean hypothesis was also rejected by this test. The results concerning the growth of variability are consistent with the assumption that observers use a city-block metric when judging the proximity of colored lights.",
keywords = "Color geometry, Color similarity, Euclidean geometry, Salience of colors",
author = "Wuerger, {Sophie M.} and Laurence Maloney and John Krauskopf",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(94)00170-Q",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "827--835",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proximity judgments in color space

T2 - Tests of a Euclidean color geometry

AU - Wuerger, Sophie M.

AU - Maloney, Laurence

AU - Krauskopf, John

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We describe two tests of the hypothesis that human judgments of the proximity of colors are consistent with a Euclidean geometry on color matching space. The first test uses proximity judgments to measure the angle between any two intersecting lines in color space. Pairwise estimates of the angles between three lines in a plane were made in order to test the additivity of angles. Three different color proximity tasks were considered. Additivity failed for each of the three proximity tasks. Secondly, we tested a prediction concerning the growth of the variability of judgments of similarity with the distance between the test and reference stimuli. The Euclidean hypothesis was also rejected by this test. The results concerning the growth of variability are consistent with the assumption that observers use a city-block metric when judging the proximity of colored lights.

AB - We describe two tests of the hypothesis that human judgments of the proximity of colors are consistent with a Euclidean geometry on color matching space. The first test uses proximity judgments to measure the angle between any two intersecting lines in color space. Pairwise estimates of the angles between three lines in a plane were made in order to test the additivity of angles. Three different color proximity tasks were considered. Additivity failed for each of the three proximity tasks. Secondly, we tested a prediction concerning the growth of the variability of judgments of similarity with the distance between the test and reference stimuli. The Euclidean hypothesis was also rejected by this test. The results concerning the growth of variability are consistent with the assumption that observers use a city-block metric when judging the proximity of colored lights.

KW - Color geometry

KW - Color similarity

KW - Euclidean geometry

KW - Salience of colors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028900128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028900128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00170-Q

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00170-Q

M3 - Article

C2 - 7740773

AN - SCOPUS:0028900128

VL - 35

SP - 827

EP - 835

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 6

ER -