Proverbs of Nonprofit Financial Management

George E. Mitchell, Thad Calabrese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Whereas the field of public administration has benefited from periods of critical reflection and reform aimed at reexamining the field’s traditional management paradigms, the related field of nonprofit management has generally lacked such an analogously explicit and sustained research program to reevaluate its own conventional wisdoms. Meanwhile, accumulated findings from the last several decades of nonprofit management research have problematized many traditional assumptions and practices in nonprofit management, specifically regarding the soundness of nomothetic management theory, the unintended negative consequences of certain management norms, and underlying assumptions about the nature and purpose of nonprofit management. This article critically reexamines four well-known “proverbs” of nonprofit financial management—minimize overhead, diversify revenues, be lean, and avoid debt—to demonstrate the need for a critical and reflective research program that takes stock and reconsiders the field’s foundational principles and assumptions. Implications are derived for scholars and practitioners, as well as for information intermediaries that evaluate nonprofits based on financial information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-661
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

financial management
management
Financial management
Nonprofit management
public administration
wisdom
revenue
paradigm
reform
Research program

Keywords

  • debt
  • diversification
  • nonprofit financial management
  • overhead
  • reserves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Proverbs of Nonprofit Financial Management. / Mitchell, George E.; Calabrese, Thad.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.08.2019, p. 649-661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{342b8c9b01804a3ba41a4b3f99b06dfb,
title = "Proverbs of Nonprofit Financial Management",
abstract = "Whereas the field of public administration has benefited from periods of critical reflection and reform aimed at reexamining the field’s traditional management paradigms, the related field of nonprofit management has generally lacked such an analogously explicit and sustained research program to reevaluate its own conventional wisdoms. Meanwhile, accumulated findings from the last several decades of nonprofit management research have problematized many traditional assumptions and practices in nonprofit management, specifically regarding the soundness of nomothetic management theory, the unintended negative consequences of certain management norms, and underlying assumptions about the nature and purpose of nonprofit management. This article critically reexamines four well-known “proverbs” of nonprofit financial management—minimize overhead, diversify revenues, be lean, and avoid debt—to demonstrate the need for a critical and reflective research program that takes stock and reconsiders the field’s foundational principles and assumptions. Implications are derived for scholars and practitioners, as well as for information intermediaries that evaluate nonprofits based on financial information.",
keywords = "debt, diversification, nonprofit financial management, overhead, reserves",
author = "Mitchell, {George E.} and Thad Calabrese",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074018770458",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "649--661",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proverbs of Nonprofit Financial Management

AU - Mitchell, George E.

AU - Calabrese, Thad

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Whereas the field of public administration has benefited from periods of critical reflection and reform aimed at reexamining the field’s traditional management paradigms, the related field of nonprofit management has generally lacked such an analogously explicit and sustained research program to reevaluate its own conventional wisdoms. Meanwhile, accumulated findings from the last several decades of nonprofit management research have problematized many traditional assumptions and practices in nonprofit management, specifically regarding the soundness of nomothetic management theory, the unintended negative consequences of certain management norms, and underlying assumptions about the nature and purpose of nonprofit management. This article critically reexamines four well-known “proverbs” of nonprofit financial management—minimize overhead, diversify revenues, be lean, and avoid debt—to demonstrate the need for a critical and reflective research program that takes stock and reconsiders the field’s foundational principles and assumptions. Implications are derived for scholars and practitioners, as well as for information intermediaries that evaluate nonprofits based on financial information.

AB - Whereas the field of public administration has benefited from periods of critical reflection and reform aimed at reexamining the field’s traditional management paradigms, the related field of nonprofit management has generally lacked such an analogously explicit and sustained research program to reevaluate its own conventional wisdoms. Meanwhile, accumulated findings from the last several decades of nonprofit management research have problematized many traditional assumptions and practices in nonprofit management, specifically regarding the soundness of nomothetic management theory, the unintended negative consequences of certain management norms, and underlying assumptions about the nature and purpose of nonprofit management. This article critically reexamines four well-known “proverbs” of nonprofit financial management—minimize overhead, diversify revenues, be lean, and avoid debt—to demonstrate the need for a critical and reflective research program that takes stock and reconsiders the field’s foundational principles and assumptions. Implications are derived for scholars and practitioners, as well as for information intermediaries that evaluate nonprofits based on financial information.

KW - debt

KW - diversification

KW - nonprofit financial management

KW - overhead

KW - reserves

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053382402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053382402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074018770458

DO - 10.1177/0275074018770458

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053382402

VL - 49

SP - 649

EP - 661

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 6

ER -