Prototypicality in sentence production

Kristine H. Onishi, Gregory L. Murphy, Kathryn Bock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Three cued-recall experiments examined the effect of category typicality on the ordering of words in sentence production. Past research has found that typical items tend to be mentioned before atypical items in a phrase-a pattern usually associated with lexical variables (like word frequency), and yet typicality is a conceptual variable. Experiment 1 revealed that an appropriate conceptual framework was necessary to yield the typicality effect. Experiment 2 tested ad hoc categories that do not have prior representations in long-term memory and yielded no typicality effect. Experiment 3 used carefully matched sentences in which two category members appeared in the same or in different phrases. Typicality affected word order only when the two words appeared in the same phrase. These results are consistent with an account in which typicality has its origin in conceptual structure, which leads to differences in lexical accessibility in appropriate contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-141
Number of pages39
JournalCognitive Psychology
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Long-Term Memory
experiment
Research
Experiments
Data storage equipment

Keywords

  • Categories
  • Concepts
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Sentence production
  • Typicality
  • Word meaning
  • Word order

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Prototypicality in sentence production. / Onishi, Kristine H.; Murphy, Gregory L.; Bock, Kathryn.

In: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 03.2008, p. 103-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Onishi, KH, Murphy, GL & Bock, K 2008, 'Prototypicality in sentence production', Cognitive Psychology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 103-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001
Onishi, Kristine H. ; Murphy, Gregory L. ; Bock, Kathryn. / Prototypicality in sentence production. In: Cognitive Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 103-141.
@article{d6223e62aacf470e9133a7bf0a896552,
title = "Prototypicality in sentence production",
abstract = "Three cued-recall experiments examined the effect of category typicality on the ordering of words in sentence production. Past research has found that typical items tend to be mentioned before atypical items in a phrase-a pattern usually associated with lexical variables (like word frequency), and yet typicality is a conceptual variable. Experiment 1 revealed that an appropriate conceptual framework was necessary to yield the typicality effect. Experiment 2 tested ad hoc categories that do not have prior representations in long-term memory and yielded no typicality effect. Experiment 3 used carefully matched sentences in which two category members appeared in the same or in different phrases. Typicality affected word order only when the two words appeared in the same phrase. These results are consistent with an account in which typicality has its origin in conceptual structure, which leads to differences in lexical accessibility in appropriate contexts.",
keywords = "Categories, Concepts, Psycholinguistics, Sentence production, Typicality, Word meaning, Word order",
author = "Onishi, {Kristine H.} and Murphy, {Gregory L.} and Kathryn Bock",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "103--141",
journal = "Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0010-0285",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prototypicality in sentence production

AU - Onishi, Kristine H.

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

AU - Bock, Kathryn

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Three cued-recall experiments examined the effect of category typicality on the ordering of words in sentence production. Past research has found that typical items tend to be mentioned before atypical items in a phrase-a pattern usually associated with lexical variables (like word frequency), and yet typicality is a conceptual variable. Experiment 1 revealed that an appropriate conceptual framework was necessary to yield the typicality effect. Experiment 2 tested ad hoc categories that do not have prior representations in long-term memory and yielded no typicality effect. Experiment 3 used carefully matched sentences in which two category members appeared in the same or in different phrases. Typicality affected word order only when the two words appeared in the same phrase. These results are consistent with an account in which typicality has its origin in conceptual structure, which leads to differences in lexical accessibility in appropriate contexts.

AB - Three cued-recall experiments examined the effect of category typicality on the ordering of words in sentence production. Past research has found that typical items tend to be mentioned before atypical items in a phrase-a pattern usually associated with lexical variables (like word frequency), and yet typicality is a conceptual variable. Experiment 1 revealed that an appropriate conceptual framework was necessary to yield the typicality effect. Experiment 2 tested ad hoc categories that do not have prior representations in long-term memory and yielded no typicality effect. Experiment 3 used carefully matched sentences in which two category members appeared in the same or in different phrases. Typicality affected word order only when the two words appeared in the same phrase. These results are consistent with an account in which typicality has its origin in conceptual structure, which leads to differences in lexical accessibility in appropriate contexts.

KW - Categories

KW - Concepts

KW - Psycholinguistics

KW - Sentence production

KW - Typicality

KW - Word meaning

KW - Word order

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149027045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149027045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 103

EP - 141

JO - Cognitive Psychology

JF - Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0010-0285

IS - 2

ER -