Promoting Prevention under the Affordable Care Act

Nadia Chait, Sharon Glied

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 placed a substantial emphasis on public health and prevention. Subsequent research on its effects reveals some notable successes and some missteps and offers important lessons for future legislators. The ACA's Prevention and Public Health Fund, intended to give public health budgetary flexibility, provided crucial funding for public health services during the Great Recession but proved highly vulnerable to subsequent budget cuts. Several programs that aimed to increase strategic thinking and planning around public health at the state level have proven to be more enduring, suggesting that the convening authority of the federal government can be a powerful tool for progress, especially when buttressed by some funding. Most important, by expanding insurance and mandating a minimum level of coverage, the ACA both increased access to clinical preventive services and freed up local public health budgets to engage in population health activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-524
Number of pages18
JournalAnnual Review of Public Health
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Public Health
Budgets
Federal Government
United States Public Health Service
Insurance
Health
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Affordable Care Act
  • capacity
  • incentives
  • prevention
  • public health
  • reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Promoting Prevention under the Affordable Care Act. / Chait, Nadia; Glied, Sharon.

In: Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 39, 01.04.2018, p. 507-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{84a3a16dfddb4171927d3834f04c0b5e,
title = "Promoting Prevention under the Affordable Care Act",
abstract = "The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 placed a substantial emphasis on public health and prevention. Subsequent research on its effects reveals some notable successes and some missteps and offers important lessons for future legislators. The ACA's Prevention and Public Health Fund, intended to give public health budgetary flexibility, provided crucial funding for public health services during the Great Recession but proved highly vulnerable to subsequent budget cuts. Several programs that aimed to increase strategic thinking and planning around public health at the state level have proven to be more enduring, suggesting that the convening authority of the federal government can be a powerful tool for progress, especially when buttressed by some funding. Most important, by expanding insurance and mandating a minimum level of coverage, the ACA both increased access to clinical preventive services and freed up local public health budgets to engage in population health activities.",
keywords = "Affordable Care Act, capacity, incentives, prevention, public health, reform",
author = "Nadia Chait and Sharon Glied",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "507--524",
journal = "Annual Review of Public Health",
issn = "0163-7525",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting Prevention under the Affordable Care Act

AU - Chait, Nadia

AU - Glied, Sharon

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 placed a substantial emphasis on public health and prevention. Subsequent research on its effects reveals some notable successes and some missteps and offers important lessons for future legislators. The ACA's Prevention and Public Health Fund, intended to give public health budgetary flexibility, provided crucial funding for public health services during the Great Recession but proved highly vulnerable to subsequent budget cuts. Several programs that aimed to increase strategic thinking and planning around public health at the state level have proven to be more enduring, suggesting that the convening authority of the federal government can be a powerful tool for progress, especially when buttressed by some funding. Most important, by expanding insurance and mandating a minimum level of coverage, the ACA both increased access to clinical preventive services and freed up local public health budgets to engage in population health activities.

AB - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 placed a substantial emphasis on public health and prevention. Subsequent research on its effects reveals some notable successes and some missteps and offers important lessons for future legislators. The ACA's Prevention and Public Health Fund, intended to give public health budgetary flexibility, provided crucial funding for public health services during the Great Recession but proved highly vulnerable to subsequent budget cuts. Several programs that aimed to increase strategic thinking and planning around public health at the state level have proven to be more enduring, suggesting that the convening authority of the federal government can be a powerful tool for progress, especially when buttressed by some funding. Most important, by expanding insurance and mandating a minimum level of coverage, the ACA both increased access to clinical preventive services and freed up local public health budgets to engage in population health activities.

KW - Affordable Care Act

KW - capacity

KW - incentives

KW - prevention

KW - public health

KW - reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044861588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044861588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013534

DO - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013534

M3 - Review article

VL - 39

SP - 507

EP - 524

JO - Annual Review of Public Health

JF - Annual Review of Public Health

SN - 0163-7525

ER -