Program Equity for all Children: Meaningful Goal or Impossible Dream?

Robert Berne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After a decade of neglect, equity issues are once again at the core of educational policy debates, but the nature of equity in the 1990s is different from in the past, especially with its inclusion of outcomes. This article explores some of these differences from two perspectives. First, although we know that many elements of outcome equity are feasible, there are significant implementation issues including outcome measurement, the quid pro quo between account ability for outcomes and governance, resource implications, the need for integrated services for children, the necessary role changes for teachers and principals, and the need for parents as partners. Second, the article summarizes the recommendations of a New York State Equity Study Group, which focused on the following three questions: (a) Can we develop definitions of educational outcomes and outcome equity? (b) Can we identify the alternative policies and programs that are aimed at redressing outcome inequities? (c) What actions are needed to allocate resources to support policies and programs that produce outcome equity?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-517
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Policy
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

equity
role change
study group
educational policy
resources
neglect
parents
inclusion
governance
ability
teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Program Equity for all Children : Meaningful Goal or Impossible Dream? / Berne, Robert.

In: Educational Policy, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1994, p. 502-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berne, Robert. / Program Equity for all Children : Meaningful Goal or Impossible Dream?. In: Educational Policy. 1994 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 502-517.
@article{09e87a40327146a889e149fbd8b5d6c3,
title = "Program Equity for all Children: Meaningful Goal or Impossible Dream?",
abstract = "After a decade of neglect, equity issues are once again at the core of educational policy debates, but the nature of equity in the 1990s is different from in the past, especially with its inclusion of outcomes. This article explores some of these differences from two perspectives. First, although we know that many elements of outcome equity are feasible, there are significant implementation issues including outcome measurement, the quid pro quo between account ability for outcomes and governance, resource implications, the need for integrated services for children, the necessary role changes for teachers and principals, and the need for parents as partners. Second, the article summarizes the recommendations of a New York State Equity Study Group, which focused on the following three questions: (a) Can we develop definitions of educational outcomes and outcome equity? (b) Can we identify the alternative policies and programs that are aimed at redressing outcome inequities? (c) What actions are needed to allocate resources to support policies and programs that produce outcome equity?.",
author = "Robert Berne",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/0895904894008004012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "502--517",
journal = "Educational Policy",
issn = "0895-9048",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Program Equity for all Children

T2 - Meaningful Goal or Impossible Dream?

AU - Berne, Robert

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - After a decade of neglect, equity issues are once again at the core of educational policy debates, but the nature of equity in the 1990s is different from in the past, especially with its inclusion of outcomes. This article explores some of these differences from two perspectives. First, although we know that many elements of outcome equity are feasible, there are significant implementation issues including outcome measurement, the quid pro quo between account ability for outcomes and governance, resource implications, the need for integrated services for children, the necessary role changes for teachers and principals, and the need for parents as partners. Second, the article summarizes the recommendations of a New York State Equity Study Group, which focused on the following three questions: (a) Can we develop definitions of educational outcomes and outcome equity? (b) Can we identify the alternative policies and programs that are aimed at redressing outcome inequities? (c) What actions are needed to allocate resources to support policies and programs that produce outcome equity?.

AB - After a decade of neglect, equity issues are once again at the core of educational policy debates, but the nature of equity in the 1990s is different from in the past, especially with its inclusion of outcomes. This article explores some of these differences from two perspectives. First, although we know that many elements of outcome equity are feasible, there are significant implementation issues including outcome measurement, the quid pro quo between account ability for outcomes and governance, resource implications, the need for integrated services for children, the necessary role changes for teachers and principals, and the need for parents as partners. Second, the article summarizes the recommendations of a New York State Equity Study Group, which focused on the following three questions: (a) Can we develop definitions of educational outcomes and outcome equity? (b) Can we identify the alternative policies and programs that are aimed at redressing outcome inequities? (c) What actions are needed to allocate resources to support policies and programs that produce outcome equity?.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973851210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973851210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0895904894008004012

DO - 10.1177/0895904894008004012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973851210

VL - 8

SP - 502

EP - 517

JO - Educational Policy

JF - Educational Policy

SN - 0895-9048

IS - 4

ER -