Professional development through a formative assessment rubric in a K-5 bilingual program

Lillian Ardell Stevens, Miriam Ebsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This case study uses an action research approach to the implementation of a systematic bilingual writing assessment that K-5 teachers administered over a two-year period in an inner-city public school with a two-way bilingual English-Spanish program. The study reflects the importance of developing an awareness of academic discourse over time, as teachers participated in a writing assessment project that included the administration of writing prompts and corresponding analysis of student writing through use of grade level rubrics, three times each year. The instrument was developed by the first author, a participant-observer who in the role of writing coordinator also led professional development workshops, and provided mentorship to teacher participants. The second researcher is an outside expert on bilingual writing who participated in the retrospective interview stage of the study. This paper will focus on insights from semi-structured interviews with teachers that reveal their current views on aspects of the writing assessment project. The questions prompted teachers to review the rubrics and associated assessment materials to garner insights about their participation in the assessment project. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicates that teachers enhanced their awareness of discourse structure and the writing process, as they incorporated the rubrics for several pedagogical purposes: more targeted whole group instruction, strategic and flexible grouping of students, and more deliberate selection of topics to support writers during individual conferences. Furthermore, teachers appreciated the ability to systematically track writing growth across the academic year, an option that had formerly been used solely for documentation of reading development in this setting. The influence of standards in providing goals for instructional outcomes is also discussed. Changes in the form of assessment are unlikely to enhance equity unless we change the ways in which assessments are used: from sorting mechanisms to diagnostic supports; from external monitors of performance to locally generated tools for inquiring deeply into teaching and learning, (Darling-Hammond, 1994: 7).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-274
Number of pages34
JournalWriting and Pedagogy
Volume10
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

teacher
interview
group instruction
Formative Assessment
Professional Development
discourse
research approach
action research
grouping
documentation
diagnostic
equity
student
school grade
writer
expert
participation
Writing Assessment
ability
Teaching

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Elementary education
  • Formative assessment
  • Professional development
  • Writing pedagogy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Professional development through a formative assessment rubric in a K-5 bilingual program. / Stevens, Lillian Ardell; Ebsworth, Miriam.

In: Writing and Pedagogy, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 01.01.2018, p. 241-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{addff2b920d446bba0027953e7fc77d2,
title = "Professional development through a formative assessment rubric in a K-5 bilingual program",
abstract = "This case study uses an action research approach to the implementation of a systematic bilingual writing assessment that K-5 teachers administered over a two-year period in an inner-city public school with a two-way bilingual English-Spanish program. The study reflects the importance of developing an awareness of academic discourse over time, as teachers participated in a writing assessment project that included the administration of writing prompts and corresponding analysis of student writing through use of grade level rubrics, three times each year. The instrument was developed by the first author, a participant-observer who in the role of writing coordinator also led professional development workshops, and provided mentorship to teacher participants. The second researcher is an outside expert on bilingual writing who participated in the retrospective interview stage of the study. This paper will focus on insights from semi-structured interviews with teachers that reveal their current views on aspects of the writing assessment project. The questions prompted teachers to review the rubrics and associated assessment materials to garner insights about their participation in the assessment project. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicates that teachers enhanced their awareness of discourse structure and the writing process, as they incorporated the rubrics for several pedagogical purposes: more targeted whole group instruction, strategic and flexible grouping of students, and more deliberate selection of topics to support writers during individual conferences. Furthermore, teachers appreciated the ability to systematically track writing growth across the academic year, an option that had formerly been used solely for documentation of reading development in this setting. The influence of standards in providing goals for instructional outcomes is also discussed. Changes in the form of assessment are unlikely to enhance equity unless we change the ways in which assessments are used: from sorting mechanisms to diagnostic supports; from external monitors of performance to locally generated tools for inquiring deeply into teaching and learning, (Darling-Hammond, 1994: 7).",
keywords = "Case study, Elementary education, Formative assessment, Professional development, Writing pedagogy",
author = "Stevens, {Lillian Ardell} and Miriam Ebsworth",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1558/wap.31176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "241--274",
journal = "Writing and Pedagogy",
issn = "1756-5839",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional development through a formative assessment rubric in a K-5 bilingual program

AU - Stevens, Lillian Ardell

AU - Ebsworth, Miriam

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This case study uses an action research approach to the implementation of a systematic bilingual writing assessment that K-5 teachers administered over a two-year period in an inner-city public school with a two-way bilingual English-Spanish program. The study reflects the importance of developing an awareness of academic discourse over time, as teachers participated in a writing assessment project that included the administration of writing prompts and corresponding analysis of student writing through use of grade level rubrics, three times each year. The instrument was developed by the first author, a participant-observer who in the role of writing coordinator also led professional development workshops, and provided mentorship to teacher participants. The second researcher is an outside expert on bilingual writing who participated in the retrospective interview stage of the study. This paper will focus on insights from semi-structured interviews with teachers that reveal their current views on aspects of the writing assessment project. The questions prompted teachers to review the rubrics and associated assessment materials to garner insights about their participation in the assessment project. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicates that teachers enhanced their awareness of discourse structure and the writing process, as they incorporated the rubrics for several pedagogical purposes: more targeted whole group instruction, strategic and flexible grouping of students, and more deliberate selection of topics to support writers during individual conferences. Furthermore, teachers appreciated the ability to systematically track writing growth across the academic year, an option that had formerly been used solely for documentation of reading development in this setting. The influence of standards in providing goals for instructional outcomes is also discussed. Changes in the form of assessment are unlikely to enhance equity unless we change the ways in which assessments are used: from sorting mechanisms to diagnostic supports; from external monitors of performance to locally generated tools for inquiring deeply into teaching and learning, (Darling-Hammond, 1994: 7).

AB - This case study uses an action research approach to the implementation of a systematic bilingual writing assessment that K-5 teachers administered over a two-year period in an inner-city public school with a two-way bilingual English-Spanish program. The study reflects the importance of developing an awareness of academic discourse over time, as teachers participated in a writing assessment project that included the administration of writing prompts and corresponding analysis of student writing through use of grade level rubrics, three times each year. The instrument was developed by the first author, a participant-observer who in the role of writing coordinator also led professional development workshops, and provided mentorship to teacher participants. The second researcher is an outside expert on bilingual writing who participated in the retrospective interview stage of the study. This paper will focus on insights from semi-structured interviews with teachers that reveal their current views on aspects of the writing assessment project. The questions prompted teachers to review the rubrics and associated assessment materials to garner insights about their participation in the assessment project. Thematic analysis of the interviews indicates that teachers enhanced their awareness of discourse structure and the writing process, as they incorporated the rubrics for several pedagogical purposes: more targeted whole group instruction, strategic and flexible grouping of students, and more deliberate selection of topics to support writers during individual conferences. Furthermore, teachers appreciated the ability to systematically track writing growth across the academic year, an option that had formerly been used solely for documentation of reading development in this setting. The influence of standards in providing goals for instructional outcomes is also discussed. Changes in the form of assessment are unlikely to enhance equity unless we change the ways in which assessments are used: from sorting mechanisms to diagnostic supports; from external monitors of performance to locally generated tools for inquiring deeply into teaching and learning, (Darling-Hammond, 1994: 7).

KW - Case study

KW - Elementary education

KW - Formative assessment

KW - Professional development

KW - Writing pedagogy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062799621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062799621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1558/wap.31176

DO - 10.1558/wap.31176

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062799621

VL - 10

SP - 241

EP - 274

JO - Writing and Pedagogy

JF - Writing and Pedagogy

SN - 1756-5839

IS - 1-2

ER -