Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Electronic discussion tools can have several advantages over classroom discussion to support productive learning conversations in science. This paper describes how an electronic collaborative discussion tool called the Multimedia Forum Kiosk (MFK) enabled equitable learning opportunities in scientific discourse: generating explanations, revising ideas of others, and asking questions. Studies compared gender differences in participation between class discussion and MFK discussion, as well as examined three different formats for electronic discussion: anonymous, attributed, and attributed with authority participation. Results indicate that in all discussions, 78% of the students contributed in electronic discussion compared to only 15.3% participation in class discussion. Females participated more than males in electronic discussion, and less than males in classroom discussion. Girls report feeling less stifled when participating in an electronic medium where anonymity is an option. All electronic discussions were characterized by high levels of scientific conceptual content, elaborations, and question-asking. Students generated a repertoire of models for phenomena, asked content-focusing questions, and provided causal explanations using MFK. Implications for future research and design of electronic discussion tools are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-36
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Science Education and Technology
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

equity
electronics
discourse
gender
science
Students
multimedia
participation
classroom
electronic media
anonymity
learning
gender-specific factors
conversation
student

Keywords

  • Collaborative learning
  • Computer-mediated communication
  • Gender
  • Science education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Productive discussion in science : Gender equity through electronic discourse. / Hsi, Sherry; Hoadley, Christopher.

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1997, p. 23-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{74443ae816684d9faf0d43088ff64206,
title = "Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse",
abstract = "Electronic discussion tools can have several advantages over classroom discussion to support productive learning conversations in science. This paper describes how an electronic collaborative discussion tool called the Multimedia Forum Kiosk (MFK) enabled equitable learning opportunities in scientific discourse: generating explanations, revising ideas of others, and asking questions. Studies compared gender differences in participation between class discussion and MFK discussion, as well as examined three different formats for electronic discussion: anonymous, attributed, and attributed with authority participation. Results indicate that in all discussions, 78{\%} of the students contributed in electronic discussion compared to only 15.3{\%} participation in class discussion. Females participated more than males in electronic discussion, and less than males in classroom discussion. Girls report feeling less stifled when participating in an electronic medium where anonymity is an option. All electronic discussions were characterized by high levels of scientific conceptual content, elaborations, and question-asking. Students generated a repertoire of models for phenomena, asked content-focusing questions, and provided causal explanations using MFK. Implications for future research and design of electronic discussion tools are discussed.",
keywords = "Collaborative learning, Computer-mediated communication, Gender, Science education",
author = "Sherry Hsi and Christopher Hoadley",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "23--36",
journal = "Journal of Science Education and Technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Productive discussion in science

T2 - Gender equity through electronic discourse

AU - Hsi, Sherry

AU - Hoadley, Christopher

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Electronic discussion tools can have several advantages over classroom discussion to support productive learning conversations in science. This paper describes how an electronic collaborative discussion tool called the Multimedia Forum Kiosk (MFK) enabled equitable learning opportunities in scientific discourse: generating explanations, revising ideas of others, and asking questions. Studies compared gender differences in participation between class discussion and MFK discussion, as well as examined three different formats for electronic discussion: anonymous, attributed, and attributed with authority participation. Results indicate that in all discussions, 78% of the students contributed in electronic discussion compared to only 15.3% participation in class discussion. Females participated more than males in electronic discussion, and less than males in classroom discussion. Girls report feeling less stifled when participating in an electronic medium where anonymity is an option. All electronic discussions were characterized by high levels of scientific conceptual content, elaborations, and question-asking. Students generated a repertoire of models for phenomena, asked content-focusing questions, and provided causal explanations using MFK. Implications for future research and design of electronic discussion tools are discussed.

AB - Electronic discussion tools can have several advantages over classroom discussion to support productive learning conversations in science. This paper describes how an electronic collaborative discussion tool called the Multimedia Forum Kiosk (MFK) enabled equitable learning opportunities in scientific discourse: generating explanations, revising ideas of others, and asking questions. Studies compared gender differences in participation between class discussion and MFK discussion, as well as examined three different formats for electronic discussion: anonymous, attributed, and attributed with authority participation. Results indicate that in all discussions, 78% of the students contributed in electronic discussion compared to only 15.3% participation in class discussion. Females participated more than males in electronic discussion, and less than males in classroom discussion. Girls report feeling less stifled when participating in an electronic medium where anonymity is an option. All electronic discussions were characterized by high levels of scientific conceptual content, elaborations, and question-asking. Students generated a repertoire of models for phenomena, asked content-focusing questions, and provided causal explanations using MFK. Implications for future research and design of electronic discussion tools are discussed.

KW - Collaborative learning

KW - Computer-mediated communication

KW - Gender

KW - Science education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242699159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242699159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:3242699159

VL - 6

SP - 23

EP - 36

JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology

JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 1

ER -