Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity

Jonathan Brennan, Liina Pylkkänen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many studies have addressed how linguistic complexity affects processing in online comprehension. However, little attention has been given to the relationship between different types of semantic complexity. We investigated two kinds of complexity that have previously been studied separately: coercion, where the meaning of a lexical item is shifted by context, and lexical semantic complexity, which describes the inherent semantic complexity of a lexical item. To compare their processing mechanisms, we used psychological verbs, which divide into two classes with different degrees of lexical semantic complexity, and also participate in a previously uninvestigated coercion, inchoative coercion. Using self-paced reading, we find a reading delay associated with both types of complexity, supporting theories that strongly connect representational complexity and processing. A subsequent magnetoencephalography study showed a distributed fronto-temporal effect around 300-500 ms for coercion but not for lexical semantic complexity. Our results conform with prior studies showing a prefrontal effect of coercion and suggest that lexical semantic complexity is processed via different mechanisms than coercion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-807
Number of pages31
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Coercion
Semantics
semantics
Reading
Magnetoencephalography
Linguistics
Verb Processing
Psychology
comprehension
Lexical Semantics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Processing psych verbs : Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. / Brennan, Jonathan; Pylkkänen, Liina.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 25, No. 6, 07.2010, p. 777-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f06791aec28437ea6c909eef8b23181,
title = "Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity",
abstract = "Many studies have addressed how linguistic complexity affects processing in online comprehension. However, little attention has been given to the relationship between different types of semantic complexity. We investigated two kinds of complexity that have previously been studied separately: coercion, where the meaning of a lexical item is shifted by context, and lexical semantic complexity, which describes the inherent semantic complexity of a lexical item. To compare their processing mechanisms, we used psychological verbs, which divide into two classes with different degrees of lexical semantic complexity, and also participate in a previously uninvestigated coercion, inchoative coercion. Using self-paced reading, we find a reading delay associated with both types of complexity, supporting theories that strongly connect representational complexity and processing. A subsequent magnetoencephalography study showed a distributed fronto-temporal effect around 300-500 ms for coercion but not for lexical semantic complexity. Our results conform with prior studies showing a prefrontal effect of coercion and suggest that lexical semantic complexity is processed via different mechanisms than coercion.",
author = "Jonathan Brennan and Liina Pylkk{\"a}nen",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/01690961003616840",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "777--807",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing psych verbs

T2 - Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity

AU - Brennan, Jonathan

AU - Pylkkänen, Liina

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Many studies have addressed how linguistic complexity affects processing in online comprehension. However, little attention has been given to the relationship between different types of semantic complexity. We investigated two kinds of complexity that have previously been studied separately: coercion, where the meaning of a lexical item is shifted by context, and lexical semantic complexity, which describes the inherent semantic complexity of a lexical item. To compare their processing mechanisms, we used psychological verbs, which divide into two classes with different degrees of lexical semantic complexity, and also participate in a previously uninvestigated coercion, inchoative coercion. Using self-paced reading, we find a reading delay associated with both types of complexity, supporting theories that strongly connect representational complexity and processing. A subsequent magnetoencephalography study showed a distributed fronto-temporal effect around 300-500 ms for coercion but not for lexical semantic complexity. Our results conform with prior studies showing a prefrontal effect of coercion and suggest that lexical semantic complexity is processed via different mechanisms than coercion.

AB - Many studies have addressed how linguistic complexity affects processing in online comprehension. However, little attention has been given to the relationship between different types of semantic complexity. We investigated two kinds of complexity that have previously been studied separately: coercion, where the meaning of a lexical item is shifted by context, and lexical semantic complexity, which describes the inherent semantic complexity of a lexical item. To compare their processing mechanisms, we used psychological verbs, which divide into two classes with different degrees of lexical semantic complexity, and also participate in a previously uninvestigated coercion, inchoative coercion. Using self-paced reading, we find a reading delay associated with both types of complexity, supporting theories that strongly connect representational complexity and processing. A subsequent magnetoencephalography study showed a distributed fronto-temporal effect around 300-500 ms for coercion but not for lexical semantic complexity. Our results conform with prior studies showing a prefrontal effect of coercion and suggest that lexical semantic complexity is processed via different mechanisms than coercion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953678358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953678358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690961003616840

DO - 10.1080/01690961003616840

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953678358

VL - 25

SP - 777

EP - 807

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 6

ER -