Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey

Lawrence P. O'Keefe, J. Anthony Movshon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Extrastriate cortical area MT is thought to process behaviorally important visual motion signals. Psychophysical studies suggest that visual motion signals may be analyzed by multiple mechanisms, a 'first-order' one based on luminance, and a 'second-order' one based upon higher level cues (e.g. contrast, flicker). Second-order motion is visible to human observers, but should be invisible to first-order motion sensors. To learn if area MT is involved in the analysis of second-order motion, we measured responses to first- and second-order gratings of single neurons in area MT (and in one experiment, in area V1) in anesthetized, paralyzed macaque monkeys. For each neuron, we measured directional and spatio-temporal tuning with conventional first-order gratings and with second-order gratings created by spatial modulation of the flicker rate of a random texture. A minority of MT and V1 neurons exhibited significant selectivity for direction or orientation of second-order gratings. In nearly all cells, response to second-order motion was weaker than response to first-order motion. MT cells with significant selectivity for second-order motion tended to be more responsive and more sensitive to luminance contrast, but were in other respects similar to the remaining MT neurons; they did not appear to represent a distinct subpopulation. For those cells selective for second-order motion, we found a correlation between the preferred directions of first- and second-order motion, and weak correlations in preferred spatial frequency. These cells preferred lower temporal frequencies for second-order motion than for first-order motion. A small proportion of MT cells seemed to remain selective and responsive for second-order motion. None of our small sample of V1 cells did. Cells in this small population, but not others, may perform 'form-cue invariant' motion processing (Albright, 1992).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-317
Number of pages13
JournalVisual Neuroscience
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1998

Fingerprint

Macaca
Haplorhini
Neurons
Cues

Keywords

  • Area MT
  • Extrastriate cortex
  • Macaque
  • Motion
  • Physiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey. / O'Keefe, Lawrence P.; Movshon, J. Anthony.

In: Visual Neuroscience, Vol. 15, No. 2, 03.1998, p. 305-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a96656de027c4ed781275cff42a7a4b5,
title = "Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey",
abstract = "Extrastriate cortical area MT is thought to process behaviorally important visual motion signals. Psychophysical studies suggest that visual motion signals may be analyzed by multiple mechanisms, a 'first-order' one based on luminance, and a 'second-order' one based upon higher level cues (e.g. contrast, flicker). Second-order motion is visible to human observers, but should be invisible to first-order motion sensors. To learn if area MT is involved in the analysis of second-order motion, we measured responses to first- and second-order gratings of single neurons in area MT (and in one experiment, in area V1) in anesthetized, paralyzed macaque monkeys. For each neuron, we measured directional and spatio-temporal tuning with conventional first-order gratings and with second-order gratings created by spatial modulation of the flicker rate of a random texture. A minority of MT and V1 neurons exhibited significant selectivity for direction or orientation of second-order gratings. In nearly all cells, response to second-order motion was weaker than response to first-order motion. MT cells with significant selectivity for second-order motion tended to be more responsive and more sensitive to luminance contrast, but were in other respects similar to the remaining MT neurons; they did not appear to represent a distinct subpopulation. For those cells selective for second-order motion, we found a correlation between the preferred directions of first- and second-order motion, and weak correlations in preferred spatial frequency. These cells preferred lower temporal frequencies for second-order motion than for first-order motion. A small proportion of MT cells seemed to remain selective and responsive for second-order motion. None of our small sample of V1 cells did. Cells in this small population, but not others, may perform 'form-cue invariant' motion processing (Albright, 1992).",
keywords = "Area MT, Extrastriate cortex, Macaque, Motion, Physiology",
author = "O'Keefe, {Lawrence P.} and Movshon, {J. Anthony}",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0952523898152094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "305--317",
journal = "Visual Neuroscience",
issn = "0952-5238",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey

AU - O'Keefe, Lawrence P.

AU - Movshon, J. Anthony

PY - 1998/3

Y1 - 1998/3

N2 - Extrastriate cortical area MT is thought to process behaviorally important visual motion signals. Psychophysical studies suggest that visual motion signals may be analyzed by multiple mechanisms, a 'first-order' one based on luminance, and a 'second-order' one based upon higher level cues (e.g. contrast, flicker). Second-order motion is visible to human observers, but should be invisible to first-order motion sensors. To learn if area MT is involved in the analysis of second-order motion, we measured responses to first- and second-order gratings of single neurons in area MT (and in one experiment, in area V1) in anesthetized, paralyzed macaque monkeys. For each neuron, we measured directional and spatio-temporal tuning with conventional first-order gratings and with second-order gratings created by spatial modulation of the flicker rate of a random texture. A minority of MT and V1 neurons exhibited significant selectivity for direction or orientation of second-order gratings. In nearly all cells, response to second-order motion was weaker than response to first-order motion. MT cells with significant selectivity for second-order motion tended to be more responsive and more sensitive to luminance contrast, but were in other respects similar to the remaining MT neurons; they did not appear to represent a distinct subpopulation. For those cells selective for second-order motion, we found a correlation between the preferred directions of first- and second-order motion, and weak correlations in preferred spatial frequency. These cells preferred lower temporal frequencies for second-order motion than for first-order motion. A small proportion of MT cells seemed to remain selective and responsive for second-order motion. None of our small sample of V1 cells did. Cells in this small population, but not others, may perform 'form-cue invariant' motion processing (Albright, 1992).

AB - Extrastriate cortical area MT is thought to process behaviorally important visual motion signals. Psychophysical studies suggest that visual motion signals may be analyzed by multiple mechanisms, a 'first-order' one based on luminance, and a 'second-order' one based upon higher level cues (e.g. contrast, flicker). Second-order motion is visible to human observers, but should be invisible to first-order motion sensors. To learn if area MT is involved in the analysis of second-order motion, we measured responses to first- and second-order gratings of single neurons in area MT (and in one experiment, in area V1) in anesthetized, paralyzed macaque monkeys. For each neuron, we measured directional and spatio-temporal tuning with conventional first-order gratings and with second-order gratings created by spatial modulation of the flicker rate of a random texture. A minority of MT and V1 neurons exhibited significant selectivity for direction or orientation of second-order gratings. In nearly all cells, response to second-order motion was weaker than response to first-order motion. MT cells with significant selectivity for second-order motion tended to be more responsive and more sensitive to luminance contrast, but were in other respects similar to the remaining MT neurons; they did not appear to represent a distinct subpopulation. For those cells selective for second-order motion, we found a correlation between the preferred directions of first- and second-order motion, and weak correlations in preferred spatial frequency. These cells preferred lower temporal frequencies for second-order motion than for first-order motion. A small proportion of MT cells seemed to remain selective and responsive for second-order motion. None of our small sample of V1 cells did. Cells in this small population, but not others, may perform 'form-cue invariant' motion processing (Albright, 1992).

KW - Area MT

KW - Extrastriate cortex

KW - Macaque

KW - Motion

KW - Physiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032032355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032032355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0952523898152094

DO - 10.1017/S0952523898152094

M3 - Article

C2 - 9605531

AN - SCOPUS:0032032355

VL - 15

SP - 305

EP - 317

JO - Visual Neuroscience

JF - Visual Neuroscience

SN - 0952-5238

IS - 2

ER -