Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart: Is there an association?

Filippa Juul, Bárbara Dos Santos Simões, Jacqueline Litvak, Euridice Martinez-Steele, Andrea Deierlein, Maya Vadiveloo, Niyati Parekh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The majority of groceries purchased by US households are industrially processed, yet it is unclear how processing level influences diet quality. We sought to determine if processing level is associated with diet quality of grocery purchases. Design: We analysed grocery purchasing data from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey 2012-2013. Household grocery purchases were categorized by the NOVA framework as minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods or ultra-processed foods. The energy share of each processing level (percentage of energy; %E) and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) component and total scores were calculated for each household's purchases. The association between %E from processed foods and ultra-processed foods, respectively, and HEI-2015 total score was determined by multivariable linear regression. Foods purchased by households with the highest v. lowest ultra-processed food purchases and HEI-2015 total score <40 v. ≥60 were compared using linear regression. Setting: USA. Participants: Nationally representative sample of 3961 households. Results: Processed foods and ultra-processed foods provided 9·2 (se 0·3) % and 55·8 (se 0·6) % of purchased energy, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 score was 54·7 (se 0·4). Substituting 10 %E from minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients for ultra-processed foods decreased total HEI-2015 score by 1·8 points (β = -1·8; 95 % CI -2·0, -1·5). Processed food purchases were not associated with diet quality. Among households with high ultra-processed food purchases, those with HEI-2015 score <40 purchased less minimally processed plant-foods than households with HEI-2015 score ≥60. Conclusions: Increasing purchases of minimally processed foods, decreasing purchases of ultra-processed foods and selecting healthier foods at each processing level may improve diet quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2357-2366
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume22
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Diet
Food
Linear Models
Edible Plants
Healthy Diet

Keywords

  • Diet quality
  • FoodAPS
  • Healthy Eating Index-2015
  • NOVA
  • Ultra-processed food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart : Is there an association? / Juul, Filippa; Simões, Bárbara Dos Santos; Litvak, Jacqueline; Martinez-Steele, Euridice; Deierlein, Andrea; Vadiveloo, Maya; Parekh, Niyati.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 22, No. 13, 01.09.2019, p. 2357-2366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juul, Filippa ; Simões, Bárbara Dos Santos ; Litvak, Jacqueline ; Martinez-Steele, Euridice ; Deierlein, Andrea ; Vadiveloo, Maya ; Parekh, Niyati. / Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart : Is there an association?. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2019 ; Vol. 22, No. 13. pp. 2357-2366.
@article{af6480d8d7c84b14ad7746dce8c6430a,
title = "Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart: Is there an association?",
abstract = "Objective: The majority of groceries purchased by US households are industrially processed, yet it is unclear how processing level influences diet quality. We sought to determine if processing level is associated with diet quality of grocery purchases. Design: We analysed grocery purchasing data from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey 2012-2013. Household grocery purchases were categorized by the NOVA framework as minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods or ultra-processed foods. The energy share of each processing level (percentage of energy; {\%}E) and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) component and total scores were calculated for each household's purchases. The association between {\%}E from processed foods and ultra-processed foods, respectively, and HEI-2015 total score was determined by multivariable linear regression. Foods purchased by households with the highest v. lowest ultra-processed food purchases and HEI-2015 total score <40 v. ≥60 were compared using linear regression. Setting: USA. Participants: Nationally representative sample of 3961 households. Results: Processed foods and ultra-processed foods provided 9·2 (se 0·3) {\%} and 55·8 (se 0·6) {\%} of purchased energy, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 score was 54·7 (se 0·4). Substituting 10 {\%}E from minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients for ultra-processed foods decreased total HEI-2015 score by 1·8 points (β = -1·8; 95 {\%} CI -2·0, -1·5). Processed food purchases were not associated with diet quality. Among households with high ultra-processed food purchases, those with HEI-2015 score <40 purchased less minimally processed plant-foods than households with HEI-2015 score ≥60. Conclusions: Increasing purchases of minimally processed foods, decreasing purchases of ultra-processed foods and selecting healthier foods at each processing level may improve diet quality.",
keywords = "Diet quality, FoodAPS, Healthy Eating Index-2015, NOVA, Ultra-processed food",
author = "Filippa Juul and Sim{\~o}es, {B{\'a}rbara Dos Santos} and Jacqueline Litvak and Euridice Martinez-Steele and Andrea Deierlein and Maya Vadiveloo and Niyati Parekh",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980019001344",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "2357--2366",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart

T2 - Is there an association?

AU - Juul, Filippa

AU - Simões, Bárbara Dos Santos

AU - Litvak, Jacqueline

AU - Martinez-Steele, Euridice

AU - Deierlein, Andrea

AU - Vadiveloo, Maya

AU - Parekh, Niyati

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objective: The majority of groceries purchased by US households are industrially processed, yet it is unclear how processing level influences diet quality. We sought to determine if processing level is associated with diet quality of grocery purchases. Design: We analysed grocery purchasing data from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey 2012-2013. Household grocery purchases were categorized by the NOVA framework as minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods or ultra-processed foods. The energy share of each processing level (percentage of energy; %E) and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) component and total scores were calculated for each household's purchases. The association between %E from processed foods and ultra-processed foods, respectively, and HEI-2015 total score was determined by multivariable linear regression. Foods purchased by households with the highest v. lowest ultra-processed food purchases and HEI-2015 total score <40 v. ≥60 were compared using linear regression. Setting: USA. Participants: Nationally representative sample of 3961 households. Results: Processed foods and ultra-processed foods provided 9·2 (se 0·3) % and 55·8 (se 0·6) % of purchased energy, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 score was 54·7 (se 0·4). Substituting 10 %E from minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients for ultra-processed foods decreased total HEI-2015 score by 1·8 points (β = -1·8; 95 % CI -2·0, -1·5). Processed food purchases were not associated with diet quality. Among households with high ultra-processed food purchases, those with HEI-2015 score <40 purchased less minimally processed plant-foods than households with HEI-2015 score ≥60. Conclusions: Increasing purchases of minimally processed foods, decreasing purchases of ultra-processed foods and selecting healthier foods at each processing level may improve diet quality.

AB - Objective: The majority of groceries purchased by US households are industrially processed, yet it is unclear how processing level influences diet quality. We sought to determine if processing level is associated with diet quality of grocery purchases. Design: We analysed grocery purchasing data from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey 2012-2013. Household grocery purchases were categorized by the NOVA framework as minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods or ultra-processed foods. The energy share of each processing level (percentage of energy; %E) and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) component and total scores were calculated for each household's purchases. The association between %E from processed foods and ultra-processed foods, respectively, and HEI-2015 total score was determined by multivariable linear regression. Foods purchased by households with the highest v. lowest ultra-processed food purchases and HEI-2015 total score <40 v. ≥60 were compared using linear regression. Setting: USA. Participants: Nationally representative sample of 3961 households. Results: Processed foods and ultra-processed foods provided 9·2 (se 0·3) % and 55·8 (se 0·6) % of purchased energy, respectively. Mean HEI-2015 score was 54·7 (se 0·4). Substituting 10 %E from minimally processed foods and processed culinary ingredients for ultra-processed foods decreased total HEI-2015 score by 1·8 points (β = -1·8; 95 % CI -2·0, -1·5). Processed food purchases were not associated with diet quality. Among households with high ultra-processed food purchases, those with HEI-2015 score <40 purchased less minimally processed plant-foods than households with HEI-2015 score ≥60. Conclusions: Increasing purchases of minimally processed foods, decreasing purchases of ultra-processed foods and selecting healthier foods at each processing level may improve diet quality.

KW - Diet quality

KW - FoodAPS

KW - Healthy Eating Index-2015

KW - NOVA

KW - Ultra-processed food

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070449162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070449162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980019001344

DO - 10.1017/S1368980019001344

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 2357

EP - 2366

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 13

ER -