Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses

Catherine Good, Joshua Aronson, Jayne Ann Harder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is well established that negative stereotypes can undermine women's performance on mathematics tests. Despite considerable laboratory evidence for the role of "stereotype threat" in girls' and women's math test performance, the relevance of such findings for the "real world" gender test-score gap remains unclear and debates about causes focus primarily on innate sex differences in cognitive capacity. Reported here are results of a field experiment that tested the usefulness of the stereotype threat formulation for understanding women's performance in upper levels of college mathematics - men and women who are highly motivated and proficient mathematicians and who are in the pipeline to mathematics and science professions. Our primary hypothesis was confirmed. Test performance of women in a stereotype-nullifying presentation of the test in an experimental group was raised significantly to surpass that of the men in the course. In a control group, in which test-takers were given the test under normal test instructions, women and men performed equally. The pattern of results suggests that even among the most highly qualified and persistent women in college mathematics, stereotype threat suppresses test performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-28
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

stereotype
threat
Mathematics
mathematics
performance
Sex Characteristics
Group
profession
Control Groups
instruction
cause
experiment
gender
science
evidence

Keywords

  • Achievement
  • Adolescence
  • Gender stereotypes
  • Math
  • Sex differences
  • Stereotype threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Problems in the pipeline : Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. / Good, Catherine; Aronson, Joshua; Harder, Jayne Ann.

In: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 17-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0dba931597f344f59fa7a70f4db8e2e6,
title = "Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses",
abstract = "It is well established that negative stereotypes can undermine women's performance on mathematics tests. Despite considerable laboratory evidence for the role of {"}stereotype threat{"} in girls' and women's math test performance, the relevance of such findings for the {"}real world{"} gender test-score gap remains unclear and debates about causes focus primarily on innate sex differences in cognitive capacity. Reported here are results of a field experiment that tested the usefulness of the stereotype threat formulation for understanding women's performance in upper levels of college mathematics - men and women who are highly motivated and proficient mathematicians and who are in the pipeline to mathematics and science professions. Our primary hypothesis was confirmed. Test performance of women in a stereotype-nullifying presentation of the test in an experimental group was raised significantly to surpass that of the men in the course. In a control group, in which test-takers were given the test under normal test instructions, women and men performed equally. The pattern of results suggests that even among the most highly qualified and persistent women in college mathematics, stereotype threat suppresses test performance.",
keywords = "Achievement, Adolescence, Gender stereotypes, Math, Sex differences, Stereotype threat",
author = "Catherine Good and Joshua Aronson and Harder, {Jayne Ann}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "17--28",
journal = "Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0193-3973",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems in the pipeline

T2 - Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses

AU - Good, Catherine

AU - Aronson, Joshua

AU - Harder, Jayne Ann

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - It is well established that negative stereotypes can undermine women's performance on mathematics tests. Despite considerable laboratory evidence for the role of "stereotype threat" in girls' and women's math test performance, the relevance of such findings for the "real world" gender test-score gap remains unclear and debates about causes focus primarily on innate sex differences in cognitive capacity. Reported here are results of a field experiment that tested the usefulness of the stereotype threat formulation for understanding women's performance in upper levels of college mathematics - men and women who are highly motivated and proficient mathematicians and who are in the pipeline to mathematics and science professions. Our primary hypothesis was confirmed. Test performance of women in a stereotype-nullifying presentation of the test in an experimental group was raised significantly to surpass that of the men in the course. In a control group, in which test-takers were given the test under normal test instructions, women and men performed equally. The pattern of results suggests that even among the most highly qualified and persistent women in college mathematics, stereotype threat suppresses test performance.

AB - It is well established that negative stereotypes can undermine women's performance on mathematics tests. Despite considerable laboratory evidence for the role of "stereotype threat" in girls' and women's math test performance, the relevance of such findings for the "real world" gender test-score gap remains unclear and debates about causes focus primarily on innate sex differences in cognitive capacity. Reported here are results of a field experiment that tested the usefulness of the stereotype threat formulation for understanding women's performance in upper levels of college mathematics - men and women who are highly motivated and proficient mathematicians and who are in the pipeline to mathematics and science professions. Our primary hypothesis was confirmed. Test performance of women in a stereotype-nullifying presentation of the test in an experimental group was raised significantly to surpass that of the men in the course. In a control group, in which test-takers were given the test under normal test instructions, women and men performed equally. The pattern of results suggests that even among the most highly qualified and persistent women in college mathematics, stereotype threat suppresses test performance.

KW - Achievement

KW - Adolescence

KW - Gender stereotypes

KW - Math

KW - Sex differences

KW - Stereotype threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41849151721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41849151721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41849151721

VL - 29

SP - 17

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

SN - 0193-3973

IS - 1

ER -