Primary care performance in Dominica

James Macinko, Geronimo Jimenez, Mario Cruz-Peñate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To document the structure and functions of primary care (PC) in the country of Dominica using the Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT), a set of questionnaires that evaluate PC functions. Methods. This cross-sectional study combined data from two surveys. The systems PCAT (S-PCAT) survey gathered national-level data from key informants about health system characteristics and PC performance. The provider version (P-PCAT) survey collected data on PC performance from health providers (nurses and physicians) at all PC facilities in the country. Provider-level data were aggregated to obtain national and district-level results for PC domains scored from 0.00 (worst) to 1.00 (best). Results. From the systems perspective, results showed several knowledge gaps in PC policy, financing, and structure. Key informants gave "Good" (adequate) ratings for "firstcontact" care (0.74), continuity of care (0.77), comprehensive care (0.70), and coordinated care (0.78); middling scores for family-centered care and community-oriented care (0.65); and low scores for access to care (0.57). PC providers assessed access to care (which included "first-contact" care, in the P-PCAT surveys) (0.84), continuity of care (0.86), information systems (0.84), family-centered care (0.92), and community-oriented care (0.85) as "Very Good"; comprehensive care as "Good" (0.79); and coordinated care as "Reasonable" (0.68). Overall, the scores for the country's health districts were good, although the ratings varied by specific PC domain. Conclusions. The assessments described here were carried out with relatively little expense and have provided important inputs into strategic planning, strategies for improving PC, and identification of priority areas for further investigation. This two-staged approach could be adapted and used in other countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalRevista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health
Volume37
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dominica
Primary Health Care
Continuity of Patient Care
Health

Keywords

  • Access
  • Dominica
  • Evaluation
  • Health care quality
  • Health systems
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Primary care performance in Dominica. / Macinko, James; Jimenez, Geronimo; Cruz-Peñate, Mario.

In: Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 104-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macinko, J, Jimenez, G & Cruz-Peñate, M 2015, 'Primary care performance in Dominica', Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 104-112.
Macinko, James ; Jimenez, Geronimo ; Cruz-Peñate, Mario. / Primary care performance in Dominica. In: Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 104-112.
@article{2ba12736341b469b9f0d4ddd6912392b,
title = "Primary care performance in Dominica",
abstract = "Objective. To document the structure and functions of primary care (PC) in the country of Dominica using the Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT), a set of questionnaires that evaluate PC functions. Methods. This cross-sectional study combined data from two surveys. The systems PCAT (S-PCAT) survey gathered national-level data from key informants about health system characteristics and PC performance. The provider version (P-PCAT) survey collected data on PC performance from health providers (nurses and physicians) at all PC facilities in the country. Provider-level data were aggregated to obtain national and district-level results for PC domains scored from 0.00 (worst) to 1.00 (best). Results. From the systems perspective, results showed several knowledge gaps in PC policy, financing, and structure. Key informants gave {"}Good{"} (adequate) ratings for {"}firstcontact{"} care (0.74), continuity of care (0.77), comprehensive care (0.70), and coordinated care (0.78); middling scores for family-centered care and community-oriented care (0.65); and low scores for access to care (0.57). PC providers assessed access to care (which included {"}first-contact{"} care, in the P-PCAT surveys) (0.84), continuity of care (0.86), information systems (0.84), family-centered care (0.92), and community-oriented care (0.85) as {"}Very Good{"}; comprehensive care as {"}Good{"} (0.79); and coordinated care as {"}Reasonable{"} (0.68). Overall, the scores for the country's health districts were good, although the ratings varied by specific PC domain. Conclusions. The assessments described here were carried out with relatively little expense and have provided important inputs into strategic planning, strategies for improving PC, and identification of priority areas for further investigation. This two-staged approach could be adapted and used in other countries.",
keywords = "Access, Dominica, Evaluation, Health care quality, Health systems, Primary health care",
author = "James Macinko and Geronimo Jimenez and Mario Cruz-Pe{\~n}ate",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "104--112",
journal = "Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1020-4989",
publisher = "Pan American Health Organization",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care performance in Dominica

AU - Macinko, James

AU - Jimenez, Geronimo

AU - Cruz-Peñate, Mario

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Objective. To document the structure and functions of primary care (PC) in the country of Dominica using the Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT), a set of questionnaires that evaluate PC functions. Methods. This cross-sectional study combined data from two surveys. The systems PCAT (S-PCAT) survey gathered national-level data from key informants about health system characteristics and PC performance. The provider version (P-PCAT) survey collected data on PC performance from health providers (nurses and physicians) at all PC facilities in the country. Provider-level data were aggregated to obtain national and district-level results for PC domains scored from 0.00 (worst) to 1.00 (best). Results. From the systems perspective, results showed several knowledge gaps in PC policy, financing, and structure. Key informants gave "Good" (adequate) ratings for "firstcontact" care (0.74), continuity of care (0.77), comprehensive care (0.70), and coordinated care (0.78); middling scores for family-centered care and community-oriented care (0.65); and low scores for access to care (0.57). PC providers assessed access to care (which included "first-contact" care, in the P-PCAT surveys) (0.84), continuity of care (0.86), information systems (0.84), family-centered care (0.92), and community-oriented care (0.85) as "Very Good"; comprehensive care as "Good" (0.79); and coordinated care as "Reasonable" (0.68). Overall, the scores for the country's health districts were good, although the ratings varied by specific PC domain. Conclusions. The assessments described here were carried out with relatively little expense and have provided important inputs into strategic planning, strategies for improving PC, and identification of priority areas for further investigation. This two-staged approach could be adapted and used in other countries.

AB - Objective. To document the structure and functions of primary care (PC) in the country of Dominica using the Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT), a set of questionnaires that evaluate PC functions. Methods. This cross-sectional study combined data from two surveys. The systems PCAT (S-PCAT) survey gathered national-level data from key informants about health system characteristics and PC performance. The provider version (P-PCAT) survey collected data on PC performance from health providers (nurses and physicians) at all PC facilities in the country. Provider-level data were aggregated to obtain national and district-level results for PC domains scored from 0.00 (worst) to 1.00 (best). Results. From the systems perspective, results showed several knowledge gaps in PC policy, financing, and structure. Key informants gave "Good" (adequate) ratings for "firstcontact" care (0.74), continuity of care (0.77), comprehensive care (0.70), and coordinated care (0.78); middling scores for family-centered care and community-oriented care (0.65); and low scores for access to care (0.57). PC providers assessed access to care (which included "first-contact" care, in the P-PCAT surveys) (0.84), continuity of care (0.86), information systems (0.84), family-centered care (0.92), and community-oriented care (0.85) as "Very Good"; comprehensive care as "Good" (0.79); and coordinated care as "Reasonable" (0.68). Overall, the scores for the country's health districts were good, although the ratings varied by specific PC domain. Conclusions. The assessments described here were carried out with relatively little expense and have provided important inputs into strategic planning, strategies for improving PC, and identification of priority areas for further investigation. This two-staged approach could be adapted and used in other countries.

KW - Access

KW - Dominica

KW - Evaluation

KW - Health care quality

KW - Health systems

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928986940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928986940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 104

EP - 112

JO - Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health

JF - Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health

SN - 1020-4989

IS - 2

ER -