Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment

David E. Levari, Daniel T. Gilbert, Timothy D. Wilson, Beau Sievers, David Amodio, Thalia Wheatley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why do some social problems seem so intractable? In a series of experiments, we show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by expanding their concept of it. When blue dots became rare, participants began to see purple dots as blue; when threatening faces became rare, participants began to see neutral faces as threatening; and when unethical requests became rare, participants began to see innocuous requests as unethical. This “prevalence-induced concept change” occurred even when participants were forewarned about it and even when they were instructed and paid to resist it. Social problems may seem intractable in part because reductions in their prevalence lead people to see more of them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1465-1467
Number of pages3
JournalScience
Volume360
Issue number6396
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 29 2018

Fingerprint

Social Problems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Levari, D. E., Gilbert, D. T., Wilson, T. D., Sievers, B., Amodio, D., & Wheatley, T. (2018). Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. Science, 360(6396), 1465-1467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8731

Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. / Levari, David E.; Gilbert, Daniel T.; Wilson, Timothy D.; Sievers, Beau; Amodio, David; Wheatley, Thalia.

In: Science, Vol. 360, No. 6396, 29.06.2018, p. 1465-1467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levari, DE, Gilbert, DT, Wilson, TD, Sievers, B, Amodio, D & Wheatley, T 2018, 'Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment', Science, vol. 360, no. 6396, pp. 1465-1467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8731
Levari DE, Gilbert DT, Wilson TD, Sievers B, Amodio D, Wheatley T. Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1465-1467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8731
Levari, David E. ; Gilbert, Daniel T. ; Wilson, Timothy D. ; Sievers, Beau ; Amodio, David ; Wheatley, Thalia. / Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. In: Science. 2018 ; Vol. 360, No. 6396. pp. 1465-1467.
@article{9ab64b7ca75e4e7d833458d1d59f0dd4,
title = "Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment",
abstract = "Why do some social problems seem so intractable? In a series of experiments, we show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by expanding their concept of it. When blue dots became rare, participants began to see purple dots as blue; when threatening faces became rare, participants began to see neutral faces as threatening; and when unethical requests became rare, participants began to see innocuous requests as unethical. This “prevalence-induced concept change” occurred even when participants were forewarned about it and even when they were instructed and paid to resist it. Social problems may seem intractable in part because reductions in their prevalence lead people to see more of them.",
author = "Levari, {David E.} and Gilbert, {Daniel T.} and Wilson, {Timothy D.} and Beau Sievers and David Amodio and Thalia Wheatley",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1126/science.aap8731",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "360",
pages = "1465--1467",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6396",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment

AU - Levari, David E.

AU - Gilbert, Daniel T.

AU - Wilson, Timothy D.

AU - Sievers, Beau

AU - Amodio, David

AU - Wheatley, Thalia

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - Why do some social problems seem so intractable? In a series of experiments, we show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by expanding their concept of it. When blue dots became rare, participants began to see purple dots as blue; when threatening faces became rare, participants began to see neutral faces as threatening; and when unethical requests became rare, participants began to see innocuous requests as unethical. This “prevalence-induced concept change” occurred even when participants were forewarned about it and even when they were instructed and paid to resist it. Social problems may seem intractable in part because reductions in their prevalence lead people to see more of them.

AB - Why do some social problems seem so intractable? In a series of experiments, we show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by expanding their concept of it. When blue dots became rare, participants began to see purple dots as blue; when threatening faces became rare, participants began to see neutral faces as threatening; and when unethical requests became rare, participants began to see innocuous requests as unethical. This “prevalence-induced concept change” occurred even when participants were forewarned about it and even when they were instructed and paid to resist it. Social problems may seem intractable in part because reductions in their prevalence lead people to see more of them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049131510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049131510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.aap8731

DO - 10.1126/science.aap8731

M3 - Article

VL - 360

SP - 1465

EP - 1467

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6396

ER -