Prevalence and predictors of residential health hazards

A pilot study

Susan Klitzman, Jack Caravanos, Deborah Deitcher, Laura Rothenberg, Candice Belanoff, Rachel Kramer, Louise Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article reports the results of a pilot study designed to ascertain the prevalence of lead-based paint (LBP), vermin, mold, and safety conditions and hazards and to validate observations and self-reports against environmental sampling data. Data are based on a convenience sample of 70 dwellings in a low-income, urban neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. The vast majority of residences (96%) contained multiple conditions and/or hazards: LBP hazards (80%), vermin (79%), elevated levels of airborne mold (39%), and safety hazards (100%). Observations and occupant reports were associated with environmental sampling data. In general, the more proximate an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the more likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., peeling LBP was associated with windowsill dust lead levels, and cockroach sightings by tenants were associated with Blatella germanica [Bla g 1] levels). Conversely, the more distal an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the less likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., water damage, alone, was not statistically associated with elevated levels of dust lead, Bla g 1, or airborne mold). Based on the findings from this pilot study, there is a need for industrial hygienists and others to adopt more comprehensive and integrative approaches to residential hazard assessment and remediation. Further research-using larger, randomly drawn samples, representing a range of housing types and geographical areas-is needed to clarify the relationship between readily observable conditions, occupant reports, and environmental sampling data and to assess the cumulative impact on human health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-301
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Paint
Mebendazole
Health
Fungi
Dust
Safety
Cockroaches
Self Report
Lead
Water
Research
allergen Bla g 1

Keywords

  • Healthy homes
  • Residential hazards
  • Visual assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Prevalence and predictors of residential health hazards : A pilot study. / Klitzman, Susan; Caravanos, Jack; Deitcher, Deborah; Rothenberg, Laura; Belanoff, Candice; Kramer, Rachel; Cohen, Louise.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 2, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 293-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klitzman, Susan ; Caravanos, Jack ; Deitcher, Deborah ; Rothenberg, Laura ; Belanoff, Candice ; Kramer, Rachel ; Cohen, Louise. / Prevalence and predictors of residential health hazards : A pilot study. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2005 ; Vol. 2, No. 6. pp. 293-301.
@article{11d210f7a67447a4ae78a5f17c80d867,
title = "Prevalence and predictors of residential health hazards: A pilot study",
abstract = "This article reports the results of a pilot study designed to ascertain the prevalence of lead-based paint (LBP), vermin, mold, and safety conditions and hazards and to validate observations and self-reports against environmental sampling data. Data are based on a convenience sample of 70 dwellings in a low-income, urban neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. The vast majority of residences (96{\%}) contained multiple conditions and/or hazards: LBP hazards (80{\%}), vermin (79{\%}), elevated levels of airborne mold (39{\%}), and safety hazards (100{\%}). Observations and occupant reports were associated with environmental sampling data. In general, the more proximate an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the more likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., peeling LBP was associated with windowsill dust lead levels, and cockroach sightings by tenants were associated with Blatella germanica [Bla g 1] levels). Conversely, the more distal an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the less likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., water damage, alone, was not statistically associated with elevated levels of dust lead, Bla g 1, or airborne mold). Based on the findings from this pilot study, there is a need for industrial hygienists and others to adopt more comprehensive and integrative approaches to residential hazard assessment and remediation. Further research-using larger, randomly drawn samples, representing a range of housing types and geographical areas-is needed to clarify the relationship between readily observable conditions, occupant reports, and environmental sampling data and to assess the cumulative impact on human health.",
keywords = "Healthy homes, Residential hazards, Visual assessment",
author = "Susan Klitzman and Jack Caravanos and Deborah Deitcher and Laura Rothenberg and Candice Belanoff and Rachel Kramer and Louise Cohen",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/15459620590958741",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "293--301",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence and predictors of residential health hazards

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Klitzman, Susan

AU - Caravanos, Jack

AU - Deitcher, Deborah

AU - Rothenberg, Laura

AU - Belanoff, Candice

AU - Kramer, Rachel

AU - Cohen, Louise

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - This article reports the results of a pilot study designed to ascertain the prevalence of lead-based paint (LBP), vermin, mold, and safety conditions and hazards and to validate observations and self-reports against environmental sampling data. Data are based on a convenience sample of 70 dwellings in a low-income, urban neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. The vast majority of residences (96%) contained multiple conditions and/or hazards: LBP hazards (80%), vermin (79%), elevated levels of airborne mold (39%), and safety hazards (100%). Observations and occupant reports were associated with environmental sampling data. In general, the more proximate an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the more likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., peeling LBP was associated with windowsill dust lead levels, and cockroach sightings by tenants were associated with Blatella germanica [Bla g 1] levels). Conversely, the more distal an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the less likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., water damage, alone, was not statistically associated with elevated levels of dust lead, Bla g 1, or airborne mold). Based on the findings from this pilot study, there is a need for industrial hygienists and others to adopt more comprehensive and integrative approaches to residential hazard assessment and remediation. Further research-using larger, randomly drawn samples, representing a range of housing types and geographical areas-is needed to clarify the relationship between readily observable conditions, occupant reports, and environmental sampling data and to assess the cumulative impact on human health.

AB - This article reports the results of a pilot study designed to ascertain the prevalence of lead-based paint (LBP), vermin, mold, and safety conditions and hazards and to validate observations and self-reports against environmental sampling data. Data are based on a convenience sample of 70 dwellings in a low-income, urban neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. The vast majority of residences (96%) contained multiple conditions and/or hazards: LBP hazards (80%), vermin (79%), elevated levels of airborne mold (39%), and safety hazards (100%). Observations and occupant reports were associated with environmental sampling data. In general, the more proximate an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the more likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., peeling LBP was associated with windowsill dust lead levels, and cockroach sightings by tenants were associated with Blatella germanica [Bla g 1] levels). Conversely, the more distal an observed condition was to an actual hazard, the less likely it was to be associated with environmental sampling results (e.g., water damage, alone, was not statistically associated with elevated levels of dust lead, Bla g 1, or airborne mold). Based on the findings from this pilot study, there is a need for industrial hygienists and others to adopt more comprehensive and integrative approaches to residential hazard assessment and remediation. Further research-using larger, randomly drawn samples, representing a range of housing types and geographical areas-is needed to clarify the relationship between readily observable conditions, occupant reports, and environmental sampling data and to assess the cumulative impact on human health.

KW - Healthy homes

KW - Residential hazards

KW - Visual assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19544367411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19544367411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15459620590958741

DO - 10.1080/15459620590958741

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 293

EP - 301

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 6

ER -