Preschoolers Use Social Allegiances to Predict Behavior

Lisa Chalik, Marjorie Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-160
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Cognition and Development
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Cognition
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Preschoolers Use Social Allegiances to Predict Behavior. / Chalik, Lisa; Rhodes, Marjorie.

In: Journal of Cognition and Development, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 136-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9badb953c7eb4029bd14d36e94ddcbcb,
title = "Preschoolers Use Social Allegiances to Predict Behavior",
abstract = "Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].",
author = "Lisa Chalik and Marjorie Rhodes",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15248372.2012.728546",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "136--160",
journal = "Journal of Cognition and Development",
issn = "1524-8372",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preschoolers Use Social Allegiances to Predict Behavior

AU - Chalik, Lisa

AU - Rhodes, Marjorie

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].

AB - Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893814617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893814617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15248372.2012.728546

DO - 10.1080/15248372.2012.728546

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893814617

VL - 15

SP - 136

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Cognition and Development

JF - Journal of Cognition and Development

SN - 1524-8372

IS - 1

ER -