Prepositional complementizers as attractors

Richard Kayne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The prepositional complementizers in French, Italian and English enter the derivation above the VP, and not as sister to the IP they are associated with. The relation between complementizer and IP is expressed by having the IP move from within VP to the specifier position of the complementizer. That movement can be thought of in terms of Chomsky's (1995: chap. 4) notion of attraction. Subsequent raising of the complementizer (to a head W), followed by phrasal movement to Spec,W, produces the observed word order in these languages. This kind of derivation (which should be generalized to many prepositions) is similar to those proposed in Kayne (1993; 1998) for various constructions involving possession, negation, ‘only /‘even /'too,focus, scope and antecedent-contained deletion. Many syntactic relations that could at first glance be expressed in terms of merger (sisterhood) turn out to be better expressed in terms of attraction.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)39-74
    Number of pages36
    JournalProbus
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1999

    Fingerprint

    merger
    possession
    language
    Complementizer
    Attractor
    Attraction

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Prepositional complementizers as attractors. / Kayne, Richard.

    In: Probus, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1999, p. 39-74.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Kayne, Richard. / Prepositional complementizers as attractors. In: Probus. 1999 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 39-74.
    @article{106b7e25d43a43aaa5b1e6f51e56eada,
    title = "Prepositional complementizers as attractors",
    abstract = "The prepositional complementizers in French, Italian and English enter the derivation above the VP, and not as sister to the IP they are associated with. The relation between complementizer and IP is expressed by having the IP move from within VP to the specifier position of the complementizer. That movement can be thought of in terms of Chomsky's (1995: chap. 4) notion of attraction. Subsequent raising of the complementizer (to a head W), followed by phrasal movement to Spec,W, produces the observed word order in these languages. This kind of derivation (which should be generalized to many prepositions) is similar to those proposed in Kayne (1993; 1998) for various constructions involving possession, negation, ‘only /‘even /'too,focus, scope and antecedent-contained deletion. Many syntactic relations that could at first glance be expressed in terms of merger (sisterhood) turn out to be better expressed in terms of attraction.",
    author = "Richard Kayne",
    year = "1999",
    doi = "10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.39",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "39--74",
    journal = "Probus",
    issn = "0921-4771",
    publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Prepositional complementizers as attractors

    AU - Kayne, Richard

    PY - 1999

    Y1 - 1999

    N2 - The prepositional complementizers in French, Italian and English enter the derivation above the VP, and not as sister to the IP they are associated with. The relation between complementizer and IP is expressed by having the IP move from within VP to the specifier position of the complementizer. That movement can be thought of in terms of Chomsky's (1995: chap. 4) notion of attraction. Subsequent raising of the complementizer (to a head W), followed by phrasal movement to Spec,W, produces the observed word order in these languages. This kind of derivation (which should be generalized to many prepositions) is similar to those proposed in Kayne (1993; 1998) for various constructions involving possession, negation, ‘only /‘even /'too,focus, scope and antecedent-contained deletion. Many syntactic relations that could at first glance be expressed in terms of merger (sisterhood) turn out to be better expressed in terms of attraction.

    AB - The prepositional complementizers in French, Italian and English enter the derivation above the VP, and not as sister to the IP they are associated with. The relation between complementizer and IP is expressed by having the IP move from within VP to the specifier position of the complementizer. That movement can be thought of in terms of Chomsky's (1995: chap. 4) notion of attraction. Subsequent raising of the complementizer (to a head W), followed by phrasal movement to Spec,W, produces the observed word order in these languages. This kind of derivation (which should be generalized to many prepositions) is similar to those proposed in Kayne (1993; 1998) for various constructions involving possession, negation, ‘only /‘even /'too,focus, scope and antecedent-contained deletion. Many syntactic relations that could at first glance be expressed in terms of merger (sisterhood) turn out to be better expressed in terms of attraction.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937177497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937177497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.39

    DO - 10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.39

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 39

    EP - 74

    JO - Probus

    JF - Probus

    SN - 0921-4771

    IS - 1

    ER -