Predicting tunneling-lnduced ground movement

Debra Laefer, Wan Soo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cost-effective and permissible tunneling can occur only if ground movement prediction is refined to accommodate changes in both the urban environment and tunneling technology. As cities age, tunnels are being installed closer to existing structures and in increasingly complicated belowground conditions. The reality of stacked tunnels, abandoned facilities, and more extensive use of underground space raises the question of whether relationships derived for single open-shield tunnels in free-field conditions can adequately predict ground movement for modern tunneling techniques with more complicated site conditions. Traditional empirical methods to predict maximum surface settlements and the percentage of lost ground for paired tunnels of the new Austrian tunneling method (NATM) in noncohesive soils are evaluated. Predictive data are compared with field measurements for grouted and nongrouted sections. Results showed that the estimated maximum settlement values of an NATM tunnel were highly similar to those of an open shield tunnel for both the grouted and ungrouted sections, although in some cases the Gaussian shape significantly underestimated the depth of the settlement trough in the outer 30% to 40%. Grouting substantially altered the amount of settlement. The average percentage of volume of lost ground with grouting was 1.6%, whereas the value was 5.2% where no grouting occurred. The empirical methods typically generated a fairly reasonable set of responses for an NATM tunnel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)208-217
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1892
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Tunnels
Grouting
Soils
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Predicting tunneling-lnduced ground movement. / Laefer, Debra; Kim, Wan Soo.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1892, 2004, p. 208-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f249f0a2ccc2460bbdf367d71aba466a,
title = "Predicting tunneling-lnduced ground movement",
abstract = "Cost-effective and permissible tunneling can occur only if ground movement prediction is refined to accommodate changes in both the urban environment and tunneling technology. As cities age, tunnels are being installed closer to existing structures and in increasingly complicated belowground conditions. The reality of stacked tunnels, abandoned facilities, and more extensive use of underground space raises the question of whether relationships derived for single open-shield tunnels in free-field conditions can adequately predict ground movement for modern tunneling techniques with more complicated site conditions. Traditional empirical methods to predict maximum surface settlements and the percentage of lost ground for paired tunnels of the new Austrian tunneling method (NATM) in noncohesive soils are evaluated. Predictive data are compared with field measurements for grouted and nongrouted sections. Results showed that the estimated maximum settlement values of an NATM tunnel were highly similar to those of an open shield tunnel for both the grouted and ungrouted sections, although in some cases the Gaussian shape significantly underestimated the depth of the settlement trough in the outer 30{\%} to 40{\%}. Grouting substantially altered the amount of settlement. The average percentage of volume of lost ground with grouting was 1.6{\%}, whereas the value was 5.2{\%} where no grouting occurred. The empirical methods typically generated a fairly reasonable set of responses for an NATM tunnel.",
author = "Debra Laefer and Kim, {Wan Soo}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "208--217",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1892",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting tunneling-lnduced ground movement

AU - Laefer, Debra

AU - Kim, Wan Soo

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Cost-effective and permissible tunneling can occur only if ground movement prediction is refined to accommodate changes in both the urban environment and tunneling technology. As cities age, tunnels are being installed closer to existing structures and in increasingly complicated belowground conditions. The reality of stacked tunnels, abandoned facilities, and more extensive use of underground space raises the question of whether relationships derived for single open-shield tunnels in free-field conditions can adequately predict ground movement for modern tunneling techniques with more complicated site conditions. Traditional empirical methods to predict maximum surface settlements and the percentage of lost ground for paired tunnels of the new Austrian tunneling method (NATM) in noncohesive soils are evaluated. Predictive data are compared with field measurements for grouted and nongrouted sections. Results showed that the estimated maximum settlement values of an NATM tunnel were highly similar to those of an open shield tunnel for both the grouted and ungrouted sections, although in some cases the Gaussian shape significantly underestimated the depth of the settlement trough in the outer 30% to 40%. Grouting substantially altered the amount of settlement. The average percentage of volume of lost ground with grouting was 1.6%, whereas the value was 5.2% where no grouting occurred. The empirical methods typically generated a fairly reasonable set of responses for an NATM tunnel.

AB - Cost-effective and permissible tunneling can occur only if ground movement prediction is refined to accommodate changes in both the urban environment and tunneling technology. As cities age, tunnels are being installed closer to existing structures and in increasingly complicated belowground conditions. The reality of stacked tunnels, abandoned facilities, and more extensive use of underground space raises the question of whether relationships derived for single open-shield tunnels in free-field conditions can adequately predict ground movement for modern tunneling techniques with more complicated site conditions. Traditional empirical methods to predict maximum surface settlements and the percentage of lost ground for paired tunnels of the new Austrian tunneling method (NATM) in noncohesive soils are evaluated. Predictive data are compared with field measurements for grouted and nongrouted sections. Results showed that the estimated maximum settlement values of an NATM tunnel were highly similar to those of an open shield tunnel for both the grouted and ungrouted sections, although in some cases the Gaussian shape significantly underestimated the depth of the settlement trough in the outer 30% to 40%. Grouting substantially altered the amount of settlement. The average percentage of volume of lost ground with grouting was 1.6%, whereas the value was 5.2% where no grouting occurred. The empirical methods typically generated a fairly reasonable set of responses for an NATM tunnel.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15544385015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15544385015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:15544385015

SP - 208

EP - 217

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1892

ER -