Predicting the near and distant future

Shiri Nussbaum, Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Four studies investigated individuals' confidence in predicting near future and distant future outcomes. Study 1 found that participants were more confident in theory-based predictions of psychological experiments when these experiments were expected to take place in the more distant future. Studies 2-4 examined participants' confidence in predicting their performance on near and distant future tests. These studies found that in predicting their more distant future performance, participants disregarded the format of the questions (e.g., multiple choice vs. open ended) and relied, instead, on their perceived general knowledge (e.g., history knowledge). Together, the present studies demonstrate that predictions of the more distant future are based on relatively abstract information. Individuals feel more confident in predicting the distant future than the near future when the predictions concern outcomes that are implied by relatively abstract information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-161
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

History
Psychology

Keywords

  • Confidence
  • Construal level theory (CLT)
  • Overconfidence
  • Prediction
  • Time distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Predicting the near and distant future. / Nussbaum, Shiri; Liberman, Nira; Trope, Yaacov.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 135, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 152-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nussbaum, Shiri ; Liberman, Nira ; Trope, Yaacov. / Predicting the near and distant future. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2006 ; Vol. 135, No. 2. pp. 152-161.
@article{422915f2784c40659540fce48a7e9224,
title = "Predicting the near and distant future",
abstract = "Four studies investigated individuals' confidence in predicting near future and distant future outcomes. Study 1 found that participants were more confident in theory-based predictions of psychological experiments when these experiments were expected to take place in the more distant future. Studies 2-4 examined participants' confidence in predicting their performance on near and distant future tests. These studies found that in predicting their more distant future performance, participants disregarded the format of the questions (e.g., multiple choice vs. open ended) and relied, instead, on their perceived general knowledge (e.g., history knowledge). Together, the present studies demonstrate that predictions of the more distant future are based on relatively abstract information. Individuals feel more confident in predicting the distant future than the near future when the predictions concern outcomes that are implied by relatively abstract information.",
keywords = "Confidence, Construal level theory (CLT), Overconfidence, Prediction, Time distance",
author = "Shiri Nussbaum and Nira Liberman and Yaacov Trope",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "152--161",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting the near and distant future

AU - Nussbaum, Shiri

AU - Liberman, Nira

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Four studies investigated individuals' confidence in predicting near future and distant future outcomes. Study 1 found that participants were more confident in theory-based predictions of psychological experiments when these experiments were expected to take place in the more distant future. Studies 2-4 examined participants' confidence in predicting their performance on near and distant future tests. These studies found that in predicting their more distant future performance, participants disregarded the format of the questions (e.g., multiple choice vs. open ended) and relied, instead, on their perceived general knowledge (e.g., history knowledge). Together, the present studies demonstrate that predictions of the more distant future are based on relatively abstract information. Individuals feel more confident in predicting the distant future than the near future when the predictions concern outcomes that are implied by relatively abstract information.

AB - Four studies investigated individuals' confidence in predicting near future and distant future outcomes. Study 1 found that participants were more confident in theory-based predictions of psychological experiments when these experiments were expected to take place in the more distant future. Studies 2-4 examined participants' confidence in predicting their performance on near and distant future tests. These studies found that in predicting their more distant future performance, participants disregarded the format of the questions (e.g., multiple choice vs. open ended) and relied, instead, on their perceived general knowledge (e.g., history knowledge). Together, the present studies demonstrate that predictions of the more distant future are based on relatively abstract information. Individuals feel more confident in predicting the distant future than the near future when the predictions concern outcomes that are implied by relatively abstract information.

KW - Confidence

KW - Construal level theory (CLT)

KW - Overconfidence

KW - Prediction

KW - Time distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745082429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745082429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.152

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.152

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 152

EP - 161

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 2

ER -