Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies

Frederick L. Oswald, Gregory Mitchell, Hart Blanton, James Jaccard, Philip E. Tetlock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article reports a meta-analysis of studies examining the predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit measures of bias for a wide range of criterion measures of discrimination. The meta-analysis estimates the heterogeneity of effects within and across 2 domains of intergroup bias (interracial and interethnic), 6 criterion categories (interpersonal behavior, person perception, policy preference, microbehavior, response time, and brain activity), 2 versions of the IAT (stereotype and attitude IATs), 3 strategies for measuring explicit bias (feeling thermometers, multi-item explicit measures such as the Modern Racism Scale, and ad hoc measures of intergroup attitudes and stereotypes), and 4 criterion-scoring methods (computed majority-minority difference scores, relative majority-minority ratings, minority-only ratings, and majority-only ratings). IATs were poor predictors of every criterion category other than brain activity, and the IATs performed no better than simple explicit measures. These results have important implications for the construct validity of IATs, for competing theories of prejudice and attitude-behavior relations, and for measuring and modeling prejudice and discrimination

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-192
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Racism
racism
Meta-Analysis
rating
minority
prejudice
Thermometers
stereotype
brain
discrimination
trend
Brain
Reaction Time
Emotions
Research Design
construct validity
human being
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Explicit measures of bias
  • Implicit Association Test
  • Predictive validity
  • Prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination : A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. / Oswald, Frederick L.; Mitchell, Gregory; Blanton, Hart; Jaccard, James; Tetlock, Philip E.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 105, No. 2, 08.2013, p. 171-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oswald, Frederick L. ; Mitchell, Gregory ; Blanton, Hart ; Jaccard, James ; Tetlock, Philip E. / Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination : A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 171-192.
@article{53e456910b3548ab869f0fa9572c2572,
title = "Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies",
abstract = "This article reports a meta-analysis of studies examining the predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit measures of bias for a wide range of criterion measures of discrimination. The meta-analysis estimates the heterogeneity of effects within and across 2 domains of intergroup bias (interracial and interethnic), 6 criterion categories (interpersonal behavior, person perception, policy preference, microbehavior, response time, and brain activity), 2 versions of the IAT (stereotype and attitude IATs), 3 strategies for measuring explicit bias (feeling thermometers, multi-item explicit measures such as the Modern Racism Scale, and ad hoc measures of intergroup attitudes and stereotypes), and 4 criterion-scoring methods (computed majority-minority difference scores, relative majority-minority ratings, minority-only ratings, and majority-only ratings). IATs were poor predictors of every criterion category other than brain activity, and the IATs performed no better than simple explicit measures. These results have important implications for the construct validity of IATs, for competing theories of prejudice and attitude-behavior relations, and for measuring and modeling prejudice and discrimination",
keywords = "Discrimination, Explicit measures of bias, Implicit Association Test, Predictive validity, Prejudice",
author = "Oswald, {Frederick L.} and Gregory Mitchell and Hart Blanton and James Jaccard and Tetlock, {Philip E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/a0032734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "171--192",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination

T2 - A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies

AU - Oswald, Frederick L.

AU - Mitchell, Gregory

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Jaccard, James

AU - Tetlock, Philip E.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - This article reports a meta-analysis of studies examining the predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit measures of bias for a wide range of criterion measures of discrimination. The meta-analysis estimates the heterogeneity of effects within and across 2 domains of intergroup bias (interracial and interethnic), 6 criterion categories (interpersonal behavior, person perception, policy preference, microbehavior, response time, and brain activity), 2 versions of the IAT (stereotype and attitude IATs), 3 strategies for measuring explicit bias (feeling thermometers, multi-item explicit measures such as the Modern Racism Scale, and ad hoc measures of intergroup attitudes and stereotypes), and 4 criterion-scoring methods (computed majority-minority difference scores, relative majority-minority ratings, minority-only ratings, and majority-only ratings). IATs were poor predictors of every criterion category other than brain activity, and the IATs performed no better than simple explicit measures. These results have important implications for the construct validity of IATs, for competing theories of prejudice and attitude-behavior relations, and for measuring and modeling prejudice and discrimination

AB - This article reports a meta-analysis of studies examining the predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit measures of bias for a wide range of criterion measures of discrimination. The meta-analysis estimates the heterogeneity of effects within and across 2 domains of intergroup bias (interracial and interethnic), 6 criterion categories (interpersonal behavior, person perception, policy preference, microbehavior, response time, and brain activity), 2 versions of the IAT (stereotype and attitude IATs), 3 strategies for measuring explicit bias (feeling thermometers, multi-item explicit measures such as the Modern Racism Scale, and ad hoc measures of intergroup attitudes and stereotypes), and 4 criterion-scoring methods (computed majority-minority difference scores, relative majority-minority ratings, minority-only ratings, and majority-only ratings). IATs were poor predictors of every criterion category other than brain activity, and the IATs performed no better than simple explicit measures. These results have important implications for the construct validity of IATs, for competing theories of prejudice and attitude-behavior relations, and for measuring and modeling prejudice and discrimination

KW - Discrimination

KW - Explicit measures of bias

KW - Implicit Association Test

KW - Predictive validity

KW - Prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882239627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882239627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0032734

DO - 10.1037/a0032734

M3 - Article

C2 - 23773046

AN - SCOPUS:84882239627

VL - 105

SP - 171

EP - 192

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -