Pre-signals for bus priority

basic guidelines for implementation

S. Ilgin Guler, Monica Menendez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    When compared to cars, public transportation (e.g., buses) can carry more people using less space. Hence, by increasing the share of people traveling by bus within an urban network, we can improve the efficiency of the urban transportation system, ultimately making it more sustainable. Unfortunately, buses operating mixed with cars can often get stuck in car congestion. One commonly used solution is to dedicate a lane for bus-use only. However, when bus flows are low, dedicated lanes running through intersections can reduce the discharge flows from these locations and lead to increased car delays, car queues, and all the negative externalities associated with congestion. This, in turn, can reduce the overall efficiency of the transportation network. Therefore, a solution is to discontinue the dedicated lane upstream of the main signal, removing bus priority at intersections. In this paper, we advocate the use of pre-signals upstream of signalized intersections to continue providing bus priority while minimizing the disruptions to car traffic. Pre-signals can allow buses to jump the car queues upstream of signalized intersections, while allowing cars to utilize the full capacity of the main signal when buses are not present. In this paper we provide practical guidelines on how to implement pre-signals at signalized intersections. Ideas on how to operate pre-signals are provided by using recent analytical and empirical findings from previous research on pre-signals. The reduction of system-wide (buses and cars) person hours of delay by using pre-signals, as compared to mixed-use lanes or dedicated bus lanes is also quantified. By doing so, the domains of application of pre-signals are also defined. This information can then be used to determine where and when pre-signals should be implemented in real urban networks and to quantify their benefits to the system.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)339-354
    Number of pages16
    JournalPublic Transport
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    Railroad cars
    efficiency
    public transportation
    transportation system
    traffic
    human being
    present
    Bus transportation
    Bus
    Urban transportation
    Car

    Keywords

    • Bus priority
    • Pre-signals
    • Signalized intersections
    • Traffic flow

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Information Systems
    • Transportation
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Management Science and Operations Research

    Cite this

    Pre-signals for bus priority : basic guidelines for implementation. / Guler, S. Ilgin; Menendez, Monica.

    In: Public Transport, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.12.2015, p. 339-354.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Guler, S. Ilgin ; Menendez, Monica. / Pre-signals for bus priority : basic guidelines for implementation. In: Public Transport. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 339-354.
    @article{cef09201141d4df496fb75c5d03546e8,
    title = "Pre-signals for bus priority: basic guidelines for implementation",
    abstract = "When compared to cars, public transportation (e.g., buses) can carry more people using less space. Hence, by increasing the share of people traveling by bus within an urban network, we can improve the efficiency of the urban transportation system, ultimately making it more sustainable. Unfortunately, buses operating mixed with cars can often get stuck in car congestion. One commonly used solution is to dedicate a lane for bus-use only. However, when bus flows are low, dedicated lanes running through intersections can reduce the discharge flows from these locations and lead to increased car delays, car queues, and all the negative externalities associated with congestion. This, in turn, can reduce the overall efficiency of the transportation network. Therefore, a solution is to discontinue the dedicated lane upstream of the main signal, removing bus priority at intersections. In this paper, we advocate the use of pre-signals upstream of signalized intersections to continue providing bus priority while minimizing the disruptions to car traffic. Pre-signals can allow buses to jump the car queues upstream of signalized intersections, while allowing cars to utilize the full capacity of the main signal when buses are not present. In this paper we provide practical guidelines on how to implement pre-signals at signalized intersections. Ideas on how to operate pre-signals are provided by using recent analytical and empirical findings from previous research on pre-signals. The reduction of system-wide (buses and cars) person hours of delay by using pre-signals, as compared to mixed-use lanes or dedicated bus lanes is also quantified. By doing so, the domains of application of pre-signals are also defined. This information can then be used to determine where and when pre-signals should be implemented in real urban networks and to quantify their benefits to the system.",
    keywords = "Bus priority, Pre-signals, Signalized intersections, Traffic flow",
    author = "Guler, {S. Ilgin} and Monica Menendez",
    year = "2015",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s12469-015-0104-9",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "339--354",
    journal = "Public Transport",
    issn = "1866-749X",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pre-signals for bus priority

    T2 - basic guidelines for implementation

    AU - Guler, S. Ilgin

    AU - Menendez, Monica

    PY - 2015/12/1

    Y1 - 2015/12/1

    N2 - When compared to cars, public transportation (e.g., buses) can carry more people using less space. Hence, by increasing the share of people traveling by bus within an urban network, we can improve the efficiency of the urban transportation system, ultimately making it more sustainable. Unfortunately, buses operating mixed with cars can often get stuck in car congestion. One commonly used solution is to dedicate a lane for bus-use only. However, when bus flows are low, dedicated lanes running through intersections can reduce the discharge flows from these locations and lead to increased car delays, car queues, and all the negative externalities associated with congestion. This, in turn, can reduce the overall efficiency of the transportation network. Therefore, a solution is to discontinue the dedicated lane upstream of the main signal, removing bus priority at intersections. In this paper, we advocate the use of pre-signals upstream of signalized intersections to continue providing bus priority while minimizing the disruptions to car traffic. Pre-signals can allow buses to jump the car queues upstream of signalized intersections, while allowing cars to utilize the full capacity of the main signal when buses are not present. In this paper we provide practical guidelines on how to implement pre-signals at signalized intersections. Ideas on how to operate pre-signals are provided by using recent analytical and empirical findings from previous research on pre-signals. The reduction of system-wide (buses and cars) person hours of delay by using pre-signals, as compared to mixed-use lanes or dedicated bus lanes is also quantified. By doing so, the domains of application of pre-signals are also defined. This information can then be used to determine where and when pre-signals should be implemented in real urban networks and to quantify their benefits to the system.

    AB - When compared to cars, public transportation (e.g., buses) can carry more people using less space. Hence, by increasing the share of people traveling by bus within an urban network, we can improve the efficiency of the urban transportation system, ultimately making it more sustainable. Unfortunately, buses operating mixed with cars can often get stuck in car congestion. One commonly used solution is to dedicate a lane for bus-use only. However, when bus flows are low, dedicated lanes running through intersections can reduce the discharge flows from these locations and lead to increased car delays, car queues, and all the negative externalities associated with congestion. This, in turn, can reduce the overall efficiency of the transportation network. Therefore, a solution is to discontinue the dedicated lane upstream of the main signal, removing bus priority at intersections. In this paper, we advocate the use of pre-signals upstream of signalized intersections to continue providing bus priority while minimizing the disruptions to car traffic. Pre-signals can allow buses to jump the car queues upstream of signalized intersections, while allowing cars to utilize the full capacity of the main signal when buses are not present. In this paper we provide practical guidelines on how to implement pre-signals at signalized intersections. Ideas on how to operate pre-signals are provided by using recent analytical and empirical findings from previous research on pre-signals. The reduction of system-wide (buses and cars) person hours of delay by using pre-signals, as compared to mixed-use lanes or dedicated bus lanes is also quantified. By doing so, the domains of application of pre-signals are also defined. This information can then be used to determine where and when pre-signals should be implemented in real urban networks and to quantify their benefits to the system.

    KW - Bus priority

    KW - Pre-signals

    KW - Signalized intersections

    KW - Traffic flow

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949219324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949219324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s12469-015-0104-9

    DO - 10.1007/s12469-015-0104-9

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 339

    EP - 354

    JO - Public Transport

    JF - Public Transport

    SN - 1866-749X

    IS - 3

    ER -