Praxial music education: A critical analysis of critical commentaries

Marissa Silverman, Susan A. Davis, David Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since its publication in 1995, a significant literature has developed around David J. Elliott's praxial philosophy of music education, as explained in Music Matters: A New Philosophy of Music Education. This literature includes a range of commentaries in journals, books, edited books, and dissertations. Although Elliott has replied to some positive and negative commentaries since 1995, he has not addressed several adverse discussions by leading music education philosophers. Accordingly, we posit that there is an important gap in music education's philosophical discourse that may cause some music education students and researchers to accept or reject important criticisms of Elliott's praxialism without sufficient information or reflection.In this article we analyze several critiques of Elliott's praxialism. Our discussion divides into three sections related to major topics presented in the praxial philosophy particularly and music education generally: music making, music listening and musical works, and musical values. Each section presents (a) critics' evaluations of Elliott's position on a given topic, and (b) Elliott's stated position on that topic, as explained in Music Matters. Where pertinent, we consult the views of other scholars on specific topics. We end each section with brief reflections on critics' claims, reserving our final evaluations for the concluding section.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-69
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Music Education
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

music lessons
music
critic
earning a doctorate
evaluation
Music Education
Critical Analysis
criticism
cause
discourse
philosophy
Values
student

Keywords

  • music listening
  • musical performance
  • musical values
  • musical works
  • praxial music education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Music
  • Education

Cite this

Praxial music education : A critical analysis of critical commentaries. / Silverman, Marissa; Davis, Susan A.; Elliott, David.

In: International Journal of Music Education, Vol. 32, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 53-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e5be79c32bd461e833846fbe4d4d886,
title = "Praxial music education: A critical analysis of critical commentaries",
abstract = "Since its publication in 1995, a significant literature has developed around David J. Elliott's praxial philosophy of music education, as explained in Music Matters: A New Philosophy of Music Education. This literature includes a range of commentaries in journals, books, edited books, and dissertations. Although Elliott has replied to some positive and negative commentaries since 1995, he has not addressed several adverse discussions by leading music education philosophers. Accordingly, we posit that there is an important gap in music education's philosophical discourse that may cause some music education students and researchers to accept or reject important criticisms of Elliott's praxialism without sufficient information or reflection.In this article we analyze several critiques of Elliott's praxialism. Our discussion divides into three sections related to major topics presented in the praxial philosophy particularly and music education generally: music making, music listening and musical works, and musical values. Each section presents (a) critics' evaluations of Elliott's position on a given topic, and (b) Elliott's stated position on that topic, as explained in Music Matters. Where pertinent, we consult the views of other scholars on specific topics. We end each section with brief reflections on critics' claims, reserving our final evaluations for the concluding section.",
keywords = "music listening, musical performance, musical values, musical works, praxial music education",
author = "Marissa Silverman and Davis, {Susan A.} and David Elliott",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0255761413488709",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "53--69",
journal = "International Journal of Music Education",
issn = "0255-7614",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Praxial music education

T2 - A critical analysis of critical commentaries

AU - Silverman, Marissa

AU - Davis, Susan A.

AU - Elliott, David

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Since its publication in 1995, a significant literature has developed around David J. Elliott's praxial philosophy of music education, as explained in Music Matters: A New Philosophy of Music Education. This literature includes a range of commentaries in journals, books, edited books, and dissertations. Although Elliott has replied to some positive and negative commentaries since 1995, he has not addressed several adverse discussions by leading music education philosophers. Accordingly, we posit that there is an important gap in music education's philosophical discourse that may cause some music education students and researchers to accept or reject important criticisms of Elliott's praxialism without sufficient information or reflection.In this article we analyze several critiques of Elliott's praxialism. Our discussion divides into three sections related to major topics presented in the praxial philosophy particularly and music education generally: music making, music listening and musical works, and musical values. Each section presents (a) critics' evaluations of Elliott's position on a given topic, and (b) Elliott's stated position on that topic, as explained in Music Matters. Where pertinent, we consult the views of other scholars on specific topics. We end each section with brief reflections on critics' claims, reserving our final evaluations for the concluding section.

AB - Since its publication in 1995, a significant literature has developed around David J. Elliott's praxial philosophy of music education, as explained in Music Matters: A New Philosophy of Music Education. This literature includes a range of commentaries in journals, books, edited books, and dissertations. Although Elliott has replied to some positive and negative commentaries since 1995, he has not addressed several adverse discussions by leading music education philosophers. Accordingly, we posit that there is an important gap in music education's philosophical discourse that may cause some music education students and researchers to accept or reject important criticisms of Elliott's praxialism without sufficient information or reflection.In this article we analyze several critiques of Elliott's praxialism. Our discussion divides into three sections related to major topics presented in the praxial philosophy particularly and music education generally: music making, music listening and musical works, and musical values. Each section presents (a) critics' evaluations of Elliott's position on a given topic, and (b) Elliott's stated position on that topic, as explained in Music Matters. Where pertinent, we consult the views of other scholars on specific topics. We end each section with brief reflections on critics' claims, reserving our final evaluations for the concluding section.

KW - music listening

KW - musical performance

KW - musical values

KW - musical works

KW - praxial music education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894189182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894189182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0255761413488709

DO - 10.1177/0255761413488709

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84894189182

VL - 32

SP - 53

EP - 69

JO - International Journal of Music Education

JF - International Journal of Music Education

SN - 0255-7614

IS - 1

ER -