Pragmatism in indian strategic thought: Evidence from the nuclear weapons debate of the 1960s

Rohan Mukherjee, Rahul Sagar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although contemporary Indian strategic thought is described in terms of various schools, most scholars agree that prior to the end of the Cold War there prevailed a so-called Nehruvian consensus on India’s strategic objectives. This consensus was allegedly idealist, emphasizing autonomy, peaceful coexistence, and Third World anti-imperialist leadership. We argue that this characterization ignores numerous alternative views on Indian strategy that thrived in elite debates outside the uppermost echelons of power. Many of these views were grounded in pragmatism, or a flexible approach to considerations of power and material interest that eschewed dogmatic thinking, be it high moralism or offensive bluster. Through a case study of India’s response to China’s emerging nuclear program following the latter’s first nuclear test in 1964, we highlight the role that pragmatism played in the national debate and the way it shaped the strategic options considered by the elite at the time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-32
Number of pages21
JournalIndia Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

nuclear weapon
pragmatism
elite
peaceful coexistence
dogmatics
Third World
cold war
evidence
autonomy
leadership
China
school
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Pragmatism in indian strategic thought : Evidence from the nuclear weapons debate of the 1960s. / Mukherjee, Rohan; Sagar, Rahul.

In: India Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 12-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{794443217e464669acaa9427c5885170,
title = "Pragmatism in indian strategic thought: Evidence from the nuclear weapons debate of the 1960s",
abstract = "Although contemporary Indian strategic thought is described in terms of various schools, most scholars agree that prior to the end of the Cold War there prevailed a so-called Nehruvian consensus on India’s strategic objectives. This consensus was allegedly idealist, emphasizing autonomy, peaceful coexistence, and Third World anti-imperialist leadership. We argue that this characterization ignores numerous alternative views on Indian strategy that thrived in elite debates outside the uppermost echelons of power. Many of these views were grounded in pragmatism, or a flexible approach to considerations of power and material interest that eschewed dogmatic thinking, be it high moralism or offensive bluster. Through a case study of India’s response to China’s emerging nuclear program following the latter’s first nuclear test in 1964, we highlight the role that pragmatism played in the national debate and the way it shaped the strategic options considered by the elite at the time.",
author = "Rohan Mukherjee and Rahul Sagar",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14736489.2018.1415272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "12--32",
journal = "India Review",
issn = "1473-6489",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatism in indian strategic thought

T2 - Evidence from the nuclear weapons debate of the 1960s

AU - Mukherjee, Rohan

AU - Sagar, Rahul

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Although contemporary Indian strategic thought is described in terms of various schools, most scholars agree that prior to the end of the Cold War there prevailed a so-called Nehruvian consensus on India’s strategic objectives. This consensus was allegedly idealist, emphasizing autonomy, peaceful coexistence, and Third World anti-imperialist leadership. We argue that this characterization ignores numerous alternative views on Indian strategy that thrived in elite debates outside the uppermost echelons of power. Many of these views were grounded in pragmatism, or a flexible approach to considerations of power and material interest that eschewed dogmatic thinking, be it high moralism or offensive bluster. Through a case study of India’s response to China’s emerging nuclear program following the latter’s first nuclear test in 1964, we highlight the role that pragmatism played in the national debate and the way it shaped the strategic options considered by the elite at the time.

AB - Although contemporary Indian strategic thought is described in terms of various schools, most scholars agree that prior to the end of the Cold War there prevailed a so-called Nehruvian consensus on India’s strategic objectives. This consensus was allegedly idealist, emphasizing autonomy, peaceful coexistence, and Third World anti-imperialist leadership. We argue that this characterization ignores numerous alternative views on Indian strategy that thrived in elite debates outside the uppermost echelons of power. Many of these views were grounded in pragmatism, or a flexible approach to considerations of power and material interest that eschewed dogmatic thinking, be it high moralism or offensive bluster. Through a case study of India’s response to China’s emerging nuclear program following the latter’s first nuclear test in 1964, we highlight the role that pragmatism played in the national debate and the way it shaped the strategic options considered by the elite at the time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044960985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044960985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14736489.2018.1415272

DO - 10.1080/14736489.2018.1415272

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044960985

VL - 17

SP - 12

EP - 32

JO - India Review

JF - India Review

SN - 1473-6489

IS - 1

ER -