Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future

Roy F. Baumeister, Kathleen D. Vohs, Gabriele Oettingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the present, the past is more knowable than the future-but people think far more about the future than the past. Both facts derive from the principle that the future can be changed whereas the past cannot. Our theory of pragmatic prospection holds that people think about the future so as to guide actions to bring about desirable outcomes. It proposes that thoughts about the future begin by imagining what one wants to happen, which is thus initially optimistic. A second stage of such prospective thinking maps out how to bring that about, and this stage is marked by consideration of obstacles, requisite steps, and other potential problems, and so it tends toward cautious realism and even pessimism. Pragmatic prospection presents a form of teleology, in which brains can anticipate possible future events and use those cognitions to guide behavior. Toward that end, it invokes meaning, consistent with evidence that thinking about the future is highly meaningful. Prospection often has narrative structure, involving a series of events in a temporal sequence linked together by meaning. Emotion is useful for evaluating different simulations of possible future events and plans. Prospection is socially learned and rests on socially constructed scaffolding for the future (e.g., future dates). Planning is perhaps the most common form of prospection, and it exemplifies all aspects of our theory (including pragmatic utility, meaning, teleological and narrative structure, and sociality). Bracing for bad news and defensive pessimism are strategies that inspire adaptive responses to feared outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-16
Number of pages14
JournalReview of General Psychology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cognition
Emotions
Brain
Thinking
Pessimism

Keywords

  • Future
  • Meaning
  • Planning
  • Prospection
  • Teleology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Pragmatic prospection : How and why people think about the future. / Baumeister, Roy F.; Vohs, Kathleen D.; Oettingen, Gabriele.

In: Review of General Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 3-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baumeister, Roy F. ; Vohs, Kathleen D. ; Oettingen, Gabriele. / Pragmatic prospection : How and why people think about the future. In: Review of General Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 3-16.
@article{a66a0fe95ca94d348a8db7eb59ee8ea5,
title = "Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future",
abstract = "In the present, the past is more knowable than the future-but people think far more about the future than the past. Both facts derive from the principle that the future can be changed whereas the past cannot. Our theory of pragmatic prospection holds that people think about the future so as to guide actions to bring about desirable outcomes. It proposes that thoughts about the future begin by imagining what one wants to happen, which is thus initially optimistic. A second stage of such prospective thinking maps out how to bring that about, and this stage is marked by consideration of obstacles, requisite steps, and other potential problems, and so it tends toward cautious realism and even pessimism. Pragmatic prospection presents a form of teleology, in which brains can anticipate possible future events and use those cognitions to guide behavior. Toward that end, it invokes meaning, consistent with evidence that thinking about the future is highly meaningful. Prospection often has narrative structure, involving a series of events in a temporal sequence linked together by meaning. Emotion is useful for evaluating different simulations of possible future events and plans. Prospection is socially learned and rests on socially constructed scaffolding for the future (e.g., future dates). Planning is perhaps the most common form of prospection, and it exemplifies all aspects of our theory (including pragmatic utility, meaning, teleological and narrative structure, and sociality). Bracing for bad news and defensive pessimism are strategies that inspire adaptive responses to feared outcomes.",
keywords = "Future, Meaning, Planning, Prospection, Teleology",
author = "Baumeister, {Roy F.} and Vohs, {Kathleen D.} and Gabriele Oettingen",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/gpr0000060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "3--16",
journal = "Review of General Psychology",
issn = "1089-2680",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatic prospection

T2 - How and why people think about the future

AU - Baumeister, Roy F.

AU - Vohs, Kathleen D.

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - In the present, the past is more knowable than the future-but people think far more about the future than the past. Both facts derive from the principle that the future can be changed whereas the past cannot. Our theory of pragmatic prospection holds that people think about the future so as to guide actions to bring about desirable outcomes. It proposes that thoughts about the future begin by imagining what one wants to happen, which is thus initially optimistic. A second stage of such prospective thinking maps out how to bring that about, and this stage is marked by consideration of obstacles, requisite steps, and other potential problems, and so it tends toward cautious realism and even pessimism. Pragmatic prospection presents a form of teleology, in which brains can anticipate possible future events and use those cognitions to guide behavior. Toward that end, it invokes meaning, consistent with evidence that thinking about the future is highly meaningful. Prospection often has narrative structure, involving a series of events in a temporal sequence linked together by meaning. Emotion is useful for evaluating different simulations of possible future events and plans. Prospection is socially learned and rests on socially constructed scaffolding for the future (e.g., future dates). Planning is perhaps the most common form of prospection, and it exemplifies all aspects of our theory (including pragmatic utility, meaning, teleological and narrative structure, and sociality). Bracing for bad news and defensive pessimism are strategies that inspire adaptive responses to feared outcomes.

AB - In the present, the past is more knowable than the future-but people think far more about the future than the past. Both facts derive from the principle that the future can be changed whereas the past cannot. Our theory of pragmatic prospection holds that people think about the future so as to guide actions to bring about desirable outcomes. It proposes that thoughts about the future begin by imagining what one wants to happen, which is thus initially optimistic. A second stage of such prospective thinking maps out how to bring that about, and this stage is marked by consideration of obstacles, requisite steps, and other potential problems, and so it tends toward cautious realism and even pessimism. Pragmatic prospection presents a form of teleology, in which brains can anticipate possible future events and use those cognitions to guide behavior. Toward that end, it invokes meaning, consistent with evidence that thinking about the future is highly meaningful. Prospection often has narrative structure, involving a series of events in a temporal sequence linked together by meaning. Emotion is useful for evaluating different simulations of possible future events and plans. Prospection is socially learned and rests on socially constructed scaffolding for the future (e.g., future dates). Planning is perhaps the most common form of prospection, and it exemplifies all aspects of our theory (including pragmatic utility, meaning, teleological and narrative structure, and sociality). Bracing for bad news and defensive pessimism are strategies that inspire adaptive responses to feared outcomes.

KW - Future

KW - Meaning

KW - Planning

KW - Prospection

KW - Teleology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954455261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954455261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/gpr0000060

DO - 10.1037/gpr0000060

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84954455261

VL - 20

SP - 3

EP - 16

JO - Review of General Psychology

JF - Review of General Psychology

SN - 1089-2680

IS - 1

ER -