Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches

M. Rodelgo-Lacruz, C. López-Bravo, F. J. González-Castaño, H. Jonathan Chao

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Event2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009 - Dresden, Germany
Duration: Jun 14 2009Jun 18 2009

Other

Other2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009
CountryGermany
CityDresden
Period6/14/096/18/09

Fingerprint

Arrayed waveguide gratings
Scalability
Switches
Wavelength
Crosstalk
Insertion losses
Scheduling algorithms
Electric power utilization

Keywords

  • AWG
  • Crosstalk
  • Optical packet switching
  • Scalability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Rodelgo-Lacruz, M., López-Bravo, C., González-Castaño, F. J., & Chao, H. J. (2009). Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches. In Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009 [5199357] https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357

Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches. / Rodelgo-Lacruz, M.; López-Bravo, C.; González-Castaño, F. J.; Chao, H. Jonathan.

Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009. 2009. 5199357.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rodelgo-Lacruz, M, López-Bravo, C, González-Castaño, FJ & Chao, HJ 2009, Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches. in Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009., 5199357, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009, Dresden, Germany, 6/14/09. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357
Rodelgo-Lacruz M, López-Bravo C, González-Castaño FJ, Chao HJ. Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches. In Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009. 2009. 5199357 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357
Rodelgo-Lacruz, M. ; López-Bravo, C. ; González-Castaño, F. J. ; Chao, H. Jonathan. / Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches. Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009. 2009.
@inproceedings{f79d07546e504e459a1c7343edbc2690,
title = "Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches",
abstract = "Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.",
keywords = "AWG, Crosstalk, Optical packet switching, Scalability",
author = "M. Rodelgo-Lacruz and C. L{\'o}pez-Bravo and Gonz{\'a}lez-Casta{\~n}o, {F. J.} and Chao, {H. Jonathan}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781424434350",
booktitle = "Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches

AU - Rodelgo-Lacruz, M.

AU - López-Bravo, C.

AU - González-Castaño, F. J.

AU - Chao, H. Jonathan

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.

AB - Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.

KW - AWG

KW - Crosstalk

KW - Optical packet switching

KW - Scalability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449509842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449509842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357

DO - 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:70449509842

SN - 9781424434350

BT - Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009

ER -