Practical consideration for 3T imaging

Weili Lin, Hongyu An, Yasheng Chen, Peter Nicholas, GuiHua Zhai, Guido Gerig, John Gilmore, Elizabeth Bullitt

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In the past 10 to 15 years, 1.5T has been one of the most commonly used field strengths for day-to-day clinical operations. However, recent advances in high field technology and the increased availability of high field (>1.5T) human scanners have opened the doors for a variety of exciting improvements in clinical and research applications of MR imaging. In particular, 3T has continued to gain wide acceptance as one of the main field strengths for clinical and research studies. Therefore, in this article the authors focus on the pros and cons of 3T imaging and comparisons between results obtained at 3T and 1.5T.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)615-639
    Number of pages25
    JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
    Volume11
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2003

    Fingerprint

    Research
    Technology
    Clinical Studies

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Cite this

    Lin, W., An, H., Chen, Y., Nicholas, P., Zhai, G., Gerig, G., ... Bullitt, E. (2003). Practical consideration for 3T imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, 11(4), 615-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00068-0

    Practical consideration for 3T imaging. / Lin, Weili; An, Hongyu; Chen, Yasheng; Nicholas, Peter; Zhai, GuiHua; Gerig, Guido; Gilmore, John; Bullitt, Elizabeth.

    In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 11, No. 4, 11.2003, p. 615-639.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Lin, W, An, H, Chen, Y, Nicholas, P, Zhai, G, Gerig, G, Gilmore, J & Bullitt, E 2003, 'Practical consideration for 3T imaging', Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 615-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00068-0
    Lin, Weili ; An, Hongyu ; Chen, Yasheng ; Nicholas, Peter ; Zhai, GuiHua ; Gerig, Guido ; Gilmore, John ; Bullitt, Elizabeth. / Practical consideration for 3T imaging. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2003 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 615-639.
    @article{2bd1858fdb0f4bf2a1f5628fbff3e5ec,
    title = "Practical consideration for 3T imaging",
    abstract = "In the past 10 to 15 years, 1.5T has been one of the most commonly used field strengths for day-to-day clinical operations. However, recent advances in high field technology and the increased availability of high field (>1.5T) human scanners have opened the doors for a variety of exciting improvements in clinical and research applications of MR imaging. In particular, 3T has continued to gain wide acceptance as one of the main field strengths for clinical and research studies. Therefore, in this article the authors focus on the pros and cons of 3T imaging and comparisons between results obtained at 3T and 1.5T.",
    author = "Weili Lin and Hongyu An and Yasheng Chen and Peter Nicholas and GuiHua Zhai and Guido Gerig and John Gilmore and Elizabeth Bullitt",
    year = "2003",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00068-0",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "615--639",
    journal = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America",
    issn = "1064-9689",
    publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Practical consideration for 3T imaging

    AU - Lin, Weili

    AU - An, Hongyu

    AU - Chen, Yasheng

    AU - Nicholas, Peter

    AU - Zhai, GuiHua

    AU - Gerig, Guido

    AU - Gilmore, John

    AU - Bullitt, Elizabeth

    PY - 2003/11

    Y1 - 2003/11

    N2 - In the past 10 to 15 years, 1.5T has been one of the most commonly used field strengths for day-to-day clinical operations. However, recent advances in high field technology and the increased availability of high field (>1.5T) human scanners have opened the doors for a variety of exciting improvements in clinical and research applications of MR imaging. In particular, 3T has continued to gain wide acceptance as one of the main field strengths for clinical and research studies. Therefore, in this article the authors focus on the pros and cons of 3T imaging and comparisons between results obtained at 3T and 1.5T.

    AB - In the past 10 to 15 years, 1.5T has been one of the most commonly used field strengths for day-to-day clinical operations. However, recent advances in high field technology and the increased availability of high field (>1.5T) human scanners have opened the doors for a variety of exciting improvements in clinical and research applications of MR imaging. In particular, 3T has continued to gain wide acceptance as one of the main field strengths for clinical and research studies. Therefore, in this article the authors focus on the pros and cons of 3T imaging and comparisons between results obtained at 3T and 1.5T.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346422438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346422438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00068-0

    DO - 10.1016/S1064-9689(03)00068-0

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 15018114

    AN - SCOPUS:0346422438

    VL - 11

    SP - 615

    EP - 639

    JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

    JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

    SN - 1064-9689

    IS - 4

    ER -