Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action

Petra C. Schmid, Tali Kleiman, David M. Amodio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Power is known to promote effective goal pursuit, especially when it requires one to overcome distractions or bias. We proposed that this effect involves the ability to engage and implement cognitive control. In Study 1, we demonstrated that power enhances behavioral performance on a response conflict task and that it does so by enhancing controlled processing rather than by reducing automatic processing. In Study 2, we used an event-related potential index of anterior cingulate activity to test whether power effects on control were due to enhanced conflict sensitivity or action implementation. Power did not significantly affect neural sensitivity to conflict; rather, high power was associated with a stronger link between conflict processing and intended action, relative to low power. These findings suggest a new perspective on how social factors can affect controlled processing and offer new evidence regarding the transition between conflict detection and the implementation of action control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-663
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Gyrus Cinguli
Evoked Potentials
Cognitive Control
Controlled

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Control
  • Event-related potential (ERP)
  • Goals
  • Social power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Power effects on cognitive control : Turning conflict into action. / Schmid, Petra C.; Kleiman, Tali; Amodio, David M.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 144, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 655-663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a479ace9e6c466192b33df92eb6c0ed,
title = "Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action",
abstract = "Power is known to promote effective goal pursuit, especially when it requires one to overcome distractions or bias. We proposed that this effect involves the ability to engage and implement cognitive control. In Study 1, we demonstrated that power enhances behavioral performance on a response conflict task and that it does so by enhancing controlled processing rather than by reducing automatic processing. In Study 2, we used an event-related potential index of anterior cingulate activity to test whether power effects on control were due to enhanced conflict sensitivity or action implementation. Power did not significantly affect neural sensitivity to conflict; rather, high power was associated with a stronger link between conflict processing and intended action, relative to low power. These findings suggest a new perspective on how social factors can affect controlled processing and offer new evidence regarding the transition between conflict detection and the implementation of action control.",
keywords = "Conflict, Control, Event-related potential (ERP), Goals, Social power",
author = "Schmid, {Petra C.} and Tali Kleiman and Amodio, {David M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "655--663",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power effects on cognitive control

T2 - Turning conflict into action

AU - Schmid, Petra C.

AU - Kleiman, Tali

AU - Amodio, David M.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Power is known to promote effective goal pursuit, especially when it requires one to overcome distractions or bias. We proposed that this effect involves the ability to engage and implement cognitive control. In Study 1, we demonstrated that power enhances behavioral performance on a response conflict task and that it does so by enhancing controlled processing rather than by reducing automatic processing. In Study 2, we used an event-related potential index of anterior cingulate activity to test whether power effects on control were due to enhanced conflict sensitivity or action implementation. Power did not significantly affect neural sensitivity to conflict; rather, high power was associated with a stronger link between conflict processing and intended action, relative to low power. These findings suggest a new perspective on how social factors can affect controlled processing and offer new evidence regarding the transition between conflict detection and the implementation of action control.

AB - Power is known to promote effective goal pursuit, especially when it requires one to overcome distractions or bias. We proposed that this effect involves the ability to engage and implement cognitive control. In Study 1, we demonstrated that power enhances behavioral performance on a response conflict task and that it does so by enhancing controlled processing rather than by reducing automatic processing. In Study 2, we used an event-related potential index of anterior cingulate activity to test whether power effects on control were due to enhanced conflict sensitivity or action implementation. Power did not significantly affect neural sensitivity to conflict; rather, high power was associated with a stronger link between conflict processing and intended action, relative to low power. These findings suggest a new perspective on how social factors can affect controlled processing and offer new evidence regarding the transition between conflict detection and the implementation of action control.

KW - Conflict

KW - Control

KW - Event-related potential (ERP)

KW - Goals

KW - Social power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930819808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930819808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000068

DO - 10.1037/xge0000068

M3 - Article

C2 - 25893536

AN - SCOPUS:84930819808

VL - 144

SP - 655

EP - 663

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -