Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas

Christopher Ewell, Sarika Cullis-Suzuki, Mikaela Ediger, John Hocevar, Dana Miller, Jennifer Jacquet

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    One way that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fish catch is laundered into the seafood market is through transshipments at-sea. This practice, which often occurs on the high seas (the areas of ocean beyond national jurisdiction), allows vessels fishing illegally to evade most monitoring and enforcement measures, offload their cargo, and resume fishing without returning to port. At the same time, transshipment at-sea can facilitate trafficking and exploitation of workers who are trapped and abused on fishing vessels. This study gives an overview of high seas transshipment as well as evaluates transshipment at-sea regulations across 17 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), which are responsible for regulating fisheries on the high seas. Transshipment at-sea regulations have become increasingly strict in most RFMOs since the late 1990s. However, only five RFMOs have mandated a partial ban, and only a single RFMO, the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO), has mandated a total ban on transshipment at-sea. A total ban on transshipment at-sea across all RFMOs would support the ability of oversight and enforcement agencies to detect and prevent IUU fishing and also likely reduce human trafficking and forced labor on the high seas.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)293-300
    Number of pages8
    JournalMarine Policy
    Volume81
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    social benefit
    social benefits
    fisheries management
    fishery
    fishery management
    fishing boats
    ban
    fisheries
    trafficking
    fishing vessel
    management
    harbors (waterways)
    seafoods
    labor
    fishing
    oceans
    sea
    Social benefits
    High seas
    Transshipment

    Keywords

    • High seas
    • Human rights
    • IUU fishing
    • Organized crime
    • Overfishing
    • Slavery at sea

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Aquatic Science
    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
    • Law

    Cite this

    Ewell, C., Cullis-Suzuki, S., Ediger, M., Hocevar, J., Miller, D., & Jacquet, J. (2017). Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas. Marine Policy, 81, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.004

    Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas. / Ewell, Christopher; Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika; Ediger, Mikaela; Hocevar, John; Miller, Dana; Jacquet, Jennifer.

    In: Marine Policy, Vol. 81, 01.07.2017, p. 293-300.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ewell, C, Cullis-Suzuki, S, Ediger, M, Hocevar, J, Miller, D & Jacquet, J 2017, 'Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas', Marine Policy, vol. 81, pp. 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.004
    Ewell, Christopher ; Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika ; Ediger, Mikaela ; Hocevar, John ; Miller, Dana ; Jacquet, Jennifer. / Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas. In: Marine Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 81. pp. 293-300.
    @article{a42fd9e1c9b44e3d83d823fbab9d40a4,
    title = "Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas",
    abstract = "One way that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fish catch is laundered into the seafood market is through transshipments at-sea. This practice, which often occurs on the high seas (the areas of ocean beyond national jurisdiction), allows vessels fishing illegally to evade most monitoring and enforcement measures, offload their cargo, and resume fishing without returning to port. At the same time, transshipment at-sea can facilitate trafficking and exploitation of workers who are trapped and abused on fishing vessels. This study gives an overview of high seas transshipment as well as evaluates transshipment at-sea regulations across 17 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), which are responsible for regulating fisheries on the high seas. Transshipment at-sea regulations have become increasingly strict in most RFMOs since the late 1990s. However, only five RFMOs have mandated a partial ban, and only a single RFMO, the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO), has mandated a total ban on transshipment at-sea. A total ban on transshipment at-sea across all RFMOs would support the ability of oversight and enforcement agencies to detect and prevent IUU fishing and also likely reduce human trafficking and forced labor on the high seas.",
    keywords = "High seas, Human rights, IUU fishing, Organized crime, Overfishing, Slavery at sea",
    author = "Christopher Ewell and Sarika Cullis-Suzuki and Mikaela Ediger and John Hocevar and Dana Miller and Jennifer Jacquet",
    year = "2017",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.004",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "293--300",
    journal = "Marine Policy",
    issn = "0308-597X",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Potential ecological and social benefits of a moratorium on transshipment on the high seas

    AU - Ewell, Christopher

    AU - Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika

    AU - Ediger, Mikaela

    AU - Hocevar, John

    AU - Miller, Dana

    AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

    PY - 2017/7/1

    Y1 - 2017/7/1

    N2 - One way that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fish catch is laundered into the seafood market is through transshipments at-sea. This practice, which often occurs on the high seas (the areas of ocean beyond national jurisdiction), allows vessels fishing illegally to evade most monitoring and enforcement measures, offload their cargo, and resume fishing without returning to port. At the same time, transshipment at-sea can facilitate trafficking and exploitation of workers who are trapped and abused on fishing vessels. This study gives an overview of high seas transshipment as well as evaluates transshipment at-sea regulations across 17 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), which are responsible for regulating fisheries on the high seas. Transshipment at-sea regulations have become increasingly strict in most RFMOs since the late 1990s. However, only five RFMOs have mandated a partial ban, and only a single RFMO, the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO), has mandated a total ban on transshipment at-sea. A total ban on transshipment at-sea across all RFMOs would support the ability of oversight and enforcement agencies to detect and prevent IUU fishing and also likely reduce human trafficking and forced labor on the high seas.

    AB - One way that illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fish catch is laundered into the seafood market is through transshipments at-sea. This practice, which often occurs on the high seas (the areas of ocean beyond national jurisdiction), allows vessels fishing illegally to evade most monitoring and enforcement measures, offload their cargo, and resume fishing without returning to port. At the same time, transshipment at-sea can facilitate trafficking and exploitation of workers who are trapped and abused on fishing vessels. This study gives an overview of high seas transshipment as well as evaluates transshipment at-sea regulations across 17 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), which are responsible for regulating fisheries on the high seas. Transshipment at-sea regulations have become increasingly strict in most RFMOs since the late 1990s. However, only five RFMOs have mandated a partial ban, and only a single RFMO, the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO), has mandated a total ban on transshipment at-sea. A total ban on transshipment at-sea across all RFMOs would support the ability of oversight and enforcement agencies to detect and prevent IUU fishing and also likely reduce human trafficking and forced labor on the high seas.

    KW - High seas

    KW - Human rights

    KW - IUU fishing

    KW - Organized crime

    KW - Overfishing

    KW - Slavery at sea

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017545362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017545362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 81

    SP - 293

    EP - 300

    JO - Marine Policy

    JF - Marine Policy

    SN - 0308-597X

    ER -