Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems: Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos

Amy Catalinac

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We study a core question of interest in political science: Do candidates position themselves differently under different electoral systems and is their positioning in line with the expectations of spatial theories? We use validated estimates of candidate ideological positions derived from quantitative scaling of 7,497 Japanese-language election manifestos written by the near universe of candidates who competed in the eight House of Representatives elections held on either side of Japan’s 1994 electoral reform. Leveraging variation before and after Japan’s electoral reform, as well as within each electoral system, we find that candidates converge in single-member districts and diverge in multimember districts, and converge on copartisans when not faced with intraparty competition and diverge when they do. Our study helps to clarify debates about the effects of electoral systems on ideological polarization and party cohesion in Japan and more generally.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-18
    Number of pages18
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Sep 19 2017

    Fingerprint

    election manifesto
    electoral system
    candidacy
    Japan
    evidence
    district
    reform
    scaling
    polarization
    political science
    election
    language

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems : Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos. / Catalinac, Amy.

    In: American Political Science Review, 19.09.2017, p. 1-18.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{ee750dd6aacb4797b05afc4f3d346fea,
    title = "Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems: Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos",
    abstract = "We study a core question of interest in political science: Do candidates position themselves differently under different electoral systems and is their positioning in line with the expectations of spatial theories? We use validated estimates of candidate ideological positions derived from quantitative scaling of 7,497 Japanese-language election manifestos written by the near universe of candidates who competed in the eight House of Representatives elections held on either side of Japan’s 1994 electoral reform. Leveraging variation before and after Japan’s electoral reform, as well as within each electoral system, we find that candidates converge in single-member districts and diverge in multimember districts, and converge on copartisans when not faced with intraparty competition and diverge when they do. Our study helps to clarify debates about the effects of electoral systems on ideological polarization and party cohesion in Japan and more generally.",
    author = "Amy Catalinac",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.1017/S0003055417000399",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "1--18",
    journal = "American Political Science Review",
    issn = "0003-0554",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems

    T2 - Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos

    AU - Catalinac, Amy

    PY - 2017/9/19

    Y1 - 2017/9/19

    N2 - We study a core question of interest in political science: Do candidates position themselves differently under different electoral systems and is their positioning in line with the expectations of spatial theories? We use validated estimates of candidate ideological positions derived from quantitative scaling of 7,497 Japanese-language election manifestos written by the near universe of candidates who competed in the eight House of Representatives elections held on either side of Japan’s 1994 electoral reform. Leveraging variation before and after Japan’s electoral reform, as well as within each electoral system, we find that candidates converge in single-member districts and diverge in multimember districts, and converge on copartisans when not faced with intraparty competition and diverge when they do. Our study helps to clarify debates about the effects of electoral systems on ideological polarization and party cohesion in Japan and more generally.

    AB - We study a core question of interest in political science: Do candidates position themselves differently under different electoral systems and is their positioning in line with the expectations of spatial theories? We use validated estimates of candidate ideological positions derived from quantitative scaling of 7,497 Japanese-language election manifestos written by the near universe of candidates who competed in the eight House of Representatives elections held on either side of Japan’s 1994 electoral reform. Leveraging variation before and after Japan’s electoral reform, as well as within each electoral system, we find that candidates converge in single-member districts and diverge in multimember districts, and converge on copartisans when not faced with intraparty competition and diverge when they do. Our study helps to clarify debates about the effects of electoral systems on ideological polarization and party cohesion in Japan and more generally.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030860227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030860227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0003055417000399

    DO - 10.1017/S0003055417000399

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85030860227

    SP - 1

    EP - 18

    JO - American Political Science Review

    JF - American Political Science Review

    SN - 0003-0554

    ER -