Population experiences of primary care in 11 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries

James Macinko, Frederico C. Guanais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To develop a measure of individual user assessments of primary care and test its association with health system performance and quality indicators. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary survey data collected in 2013. Setting: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Study Participants: 20 045 respondents. Main Outcome Measures: Individual report of financial protection (out of pocket expenses over USD 1000), lack of receipt of appropriate/timely care (use of the emergency room in the past 2 years, having consulted three of more doctors in the past year) and clinical prevention (blood pressure check in past year, cholesterol checked in the past 5 years, receipt of influenza vaccination in past year and report of any medical error). Methods: A score of users' primary care experiences was constructed from 14 individual survey questions. Multivariable Poisson and augmented inverse-probability weighted regression assess the relationship between the primary care experience score and outcomes. Results: Countries differed regarding the proportion of the population experiencing problems with primary care. In analyses controlling for age, sex, health status, chronic disease, income level and health insurance, users experiencing poorer primary carewere significantly more likely to report significant out of pocket expenses, emergency room use in the past 2 years, having consulted more than three doctors in the past year, lower likelihood of blood pressure or cholesterol screening, an annual flu shot and higher reports of medical error. Conclusions: The measure of individual primary care experience can be used to differentiate among different country's primary care approaches and is strongly associated with overall health system performance and quality indicators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-450
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Population
Medical Errors
Health Expenditures
Health Status
Hospital Emergency Service
Cholesterol
Blood Pressure
Health
Norway
Health Insurance
Switzerland
New Zealand
Sweden
Netherlands
Human Influenza
France
Canada
Germany
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development

Keywords

  • Health systems
  • Healthcare quality
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Population experiences of primary care in 11 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. / Macinko, James; Guanais, Frederico C.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2015, p. 443-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad790c171d4e4f63845924eec0b101f2,
title = "Population experiences of primary care in 11 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries",
abstract = "Objective: To develop a measure of individual user assessments of primary care and test its association with health system performance and quality indicators. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary survey data collected in 2013. Setting: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Study Participants: 20 045 respondents. Main Outcome Measures: Individual report of financial protection (out of pocket expenses over USD 1000), lack of receipt of appropriate/timely care (use of the emergency room in the past 2 years, having consulted three of more doctors in the past year) and clinical prevention (blood pressure check in past year, cholesterol checked in the past 5 years, receipt of influenza vaccination in past year and report of any medical error). Methods: A score of users' primary care experiences was constructed from 14 individual survey questions. Multivariable Poisson and augmented inverse-probability weighted regression assess the relationship between the primary care experience score and outcomes. Results: Countries differed regarding the proportion of the population experiencing problems with primary care. In analyses controlling for age, sex, health status, chronic disease, income level and health insurance, users experiencing poorer primary carewere significantly more likely to report significant out of pocket expenses, emergency room use in the past 2 years, having consulted more than three doctors in the past year, lower likelihood of blood pressure or cholesterol screening, an annual flu shot and higher reports of medical error. Conclusions: The measure of individual primary care experience can be used to differentiate among different country's primary care approaches and is strongly associated with overall health system performance and quality indicators.",
keywords = "Health systems, Healthcare quality, Primary care",
author = "James Macinko and Guanais, {Frederico C.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzv074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "443--450",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population experiences of primary care in 11 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries

AU - Macinko, James

AU - Guanais, Frederico C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: To develop a measure of individual user assessments of primary care and test its association with health system performance and quality indicators. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary survey data collected in 2013. Setting: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Study Participants: 20 045 respondents. Main Outcome Measures: Individual report of financial protection (out of pocket expenses over USD 1000), lack of receipt of appropriate/timely care (use of the emergency room in the past 2 years, having consulted three of more doctors in the past year) and clinical prevention (blood pressure check in past year, cholesterol checked in the past 5 years, receipt of influenza vaccination in past year and report of any medical error). Methods: A score of users' primary care experiences was constructed from 14 individual survey questions. Multivariable Poisson and augmented inverse-probability weighted regression assess the relationship between the primary care experience score and outcomes. Results: Countries differed regarding the proportion of the population experiencing problems with primary care. In analyses controlling for age, sex, health status, chronic disease, income level and health insurance, users experiencing poorer primary carewere significantly more likely to report significant out of pocket expenses, emergency room use in the past 2 years, having consulted more than three doctors in the past year, lower likelihood of blood pressure or cholesterol screening, an annual flu shot and higher reports of medical error. Conclusions: The measure of individual primary care experience can be used to differentiate among different country's primary care approaches and is strongly associated with overall health system performance and quality indicators.

AB - Objective: To develop a measure of individual user assessments of primary care and test its association with health system performance and quality indicators. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary survey data collected in 2013. Setting: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Study Participants: 20 045 respondents. Main Outcome Measures: Individual report of financial protection (out of pocket expenses over USD 1000), lack of receipt of appropriate/timely care (use of the emergency room in the past 2 years, having consulted three of more doctors in the past year) and clinical prevention (blood pressure check in past year, cholesterol checked in the past 5 years, receipt of influenza vaccination in past year and report of any medical error). Methods: A score of users' primary care experiences was constructed from 14 individual survey questions. Multivariable Poisson and augmented inverse-probability weighted regression assess the relationship between the primary care experience score and outcomes. Results: Countries differed regarding the proportion of the population experiencing problems with primary care. In analyses controlling for age, sex, health status, chronic disease, income level and health insurance, users experiencing poorer primary carewere significantly more likely to report significant out of pocket expenses, emergency room use in the past 2 years, having consulted more than three doctors in the past year, lower likelihood of blood pressure or cholesterol screening, an annual flu shot and higher reports of medical error. Conclusions: The measure of individual primary care experience can be used to differentiate among different country's primary care approaches and is strongly associated with overall health system performance and quality indicators.

KW - Health systems

KW - Healthcare quality

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958646483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958646483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzv074

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzv074

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 443

EP - 450

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 6

ER -