Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property

Adam Przeworski, M. Wallerstein

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Popular sovereignty has been historically seen as vulnerable to three threats: Imperfections of the democratic process, autonomy of the state, and private property (I). The argument that popular sovereignty is unfeasible, whether because of the irredeemable weakness of the people or the inherent vulnerability of democratic institutions, has constituted the conservative position since the time of the French and the American revolutions. The fear of state autonomy has a more convoluted history: Originally a left-wing theme, antistatism was only recently and only in part embraced by the Right. Finally, the belief that popular sovereignty is impossible or at least gravely limited in any society in which productive resources are owned privately has been the traditional, almost defining, feature of socialist movements. The purpose of this paper is to examine these traditional positions in their contemporary form, specifically, to reconstruct the arguments, to analyze their logical and empirical validity, to identity issues that can be resolved, and to draw some consequences.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)21-65
    Number of pages45
    JournalArchives Europeennes de Sociologie
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    private property
    sovereignty
    autonomy
    socialist movement
    vulnerability
    threat
    anxiety
    history
    resources

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property. / Przeworski, Adam; Wallerstein, M.

    In: Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2001, p. 21-65.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Przeworski, A & Wallerstein, M 2001, 'Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property', Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 21-65.
    Przeworski, Adam ; Wallerstein, M. / Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property. In: Archives Europeennes de Sociologie. 2001 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 21-65.
    @article{a97e3469fc0f4c839f0ee7b83aa7fa6f,
    title = "Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property",
    abstract = "Popular sovereignty has been historically seen as vulnerable to three threats: Imperfections of the democratic process, autonomy of the state, and private property (I). The argument that popular sovereignty is unfeasible, whether because of the irredeemable weakness of the people or the inherent vulnerability of democratic institutions, has constituted the conservative position since the time of the French and the American revolutions. The fear of state autonomy has a more convoluted history: Originally a left-wing theme, antistatism was only recently and only in part embraced by the Right. Finally, the belief that popular sovereignty is impossible or at least gravely limited in any society in which productive resources are owned privately has been the traditional, almost defining, feature of socialist movements. The purpose of this paper is to examine these traditional positions in their contemporary form, specifically, to reconstruct the arguments, to analyze their logical and empirical validity, to identity issues that can be resolved, and to draw some consequences.",
    author = "Adam Przeworski and M. Wallerstein",
    year = "2001",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "21--65",
    journal = "Archives Europeennes de Sociologie",
    issn = "0003-9756",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Popular sovereignty, state autonomy, and private property

    AU - Przeworski, Adam

    AU - Wallerstein, M.

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - Popular sovereignty has been historically seen as vulnerable to three threats: Imperfections of the democratic process, autonomy of the state, and private property (I). The argument that popular sovereignty is unfeasible, whether because of the irredeemable weakness of the people or the inherent vulnerability of democratic institutions, has constituted the conservative position since the time of the French and the American revolutions. The fear of state autonomy has a more convoluted history: Originally a left-wing theme, antistatism was only recently and only in part embraced by the Right. Finally, the belief that popular sovereignty is impossible or at least gravely limited in any society in which productive resources are owned privately has been the traditional, almost defining, feature of socialist movements. The purpose of this paper is to examine these traditional positions in their contemporary form, specifically, to reconstruct the arguments, to analyze their logical and empirical validity, to identity issues that can be resolved, and to draw some consequences.

    AB - Popular sovereignty has been historically seen as vulnerable to three threats: Imperfections of the democratic process, autonomy of the state, and private property (I). The argument that popular sovereignty is unfeasible, whether because of the irredeemable weakness of the people or the inherent vulnerability of democratic institutions, has constituted the conservative position since the time of the French and the American revolutions. The fear of state autonomy has a more convoluted history: Originally a left-wing theme, antistatism was only recently and only in part embraced by the Right. Finally, the belief that popular sovereignty is impossible or at least gravely limited in any society in which productive resources are owned privately has been the traditional, almost defining, feature of socialist movements. The purpose of this paper is to examine these traditional positions in their contemporary form, specifically, to reconstruct the arguments, to analyze their logical and empirical validity, to identity issues that can be resolved, and to draw some consequences.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035042780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035042780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0035042780

    VL - 42

    SP - 21

    EP - 65

    JO - Archives Europeennes de Sociologie

    JF - Archives Europeennes de Sociologie

    SN - 0003-9756

    IS - 1

    ER -