Political Ritual and Social Integration

Steven Lukes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The article is concerned with the role played by rituals in the politics of advanced industrial societies. First, after considering the disputes of the anthropologists, a working definition of ritual is offered. The central, critical part of the paper discusses a range of attempts that have been made to apply a particular theory of ritual—the Durkheimian theory—to the politics of modern societies, specifically the United States and Britain. These 'neo-Durkheimian' analyses (of Shils and Young, Blumleret al., Lloyd Warner, Bellah and Verba) are criticized for using too simple a notion of social integration, and for making too narrow a selection and offering too narrow an analysis of political rituals. Their approach is further criticized for closing off a whole range of significant and critical questions about political rituals—questions which bring out their cognitive role and the cognitive dimension of the exercise of power in stratified, conflictual and pluralistic modern industrial societies. Finally, it is suggested that, once those questions are asked, one arrives at a view of many political rituals that pictures them, not as promoting value integration, but as crucial elements in the 'mobilization of bias'.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)289-308
    Number of pages20
    JournalSociology
    Volume9
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1975

    Fingerprint

    social integration
    religious behavior
    industrial society
    politics
    mobilization
    trend
    society
    Values

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Political Ritual and Social Integration. / Lukes, Steven.

    In: Sociology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1975, p. 289-308.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Lukes, Steven. / Political Ritual and Social Integration. In: Sociology. 1975 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 289-308.
    @article{6672a5de4dda4c9a8e513868c278bb67,
    title = "Political Ritual and Social Integration",
    abstract = "The article is concerned with the role played by rituals in the politics of advanced industrial societies. First, after considering the disputes of the anthropologists, a working definition of ritual is offered. The central, critical part of the paper discusses a range of attempts that have been made to apply a particular theory of ritual—the Durkheimian theory—to the politics of modern societies, specifically the United States and Britain. These 'neo-Durkheimian' analyses (of Shils and Young, Blumleret al., Lloyd Warner, Bellah and Verba) are criticized for using too simple a notion of social integration, and for making too narrow a selection and offering too narrow an analysis of political rituals. Their approach is further criticized for closing off a whole range of significant and critical questions about political rituals—questions which bring out their cognitive role and the cognitive dimension of the exercise of power in stratified, conflictual and pluralistic modern industrial societies. Finally, it is suggested that, once those questions are asked, one arrives at a view of many political rituals that pictures them, not as promoting value integration, but as crucial elements in the 'mobilization of bias'.",
    author = "Steven Lukes",
    year = "1975",
    doi = "10.1177/003803857500900205",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "289--308",
    journal = "Sociology",
    issn = "0038-0385",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Political Ritual and Social Integration

    AU - Lukes, Steven

    PY - 1975

    Y1 - 1975

    N2 - The article is concerned with the role played by rituals in the politics of advanced industrial societies. First, after considering the disputes of the anthropologists, a working definition of ritual is offered. The central, critical part of the paper discusses a range of attempts that have been made to apply a particular theory of ritual—the Durkheimian theory—to the politics of modern societies, specifically the United States and Britain. These 'neo-Durkheimian' analyses (of Shils and Young, Blumleret al., Lloyd Warner, Bellah and Verba) are criticized for using too simple a notion of social integration, and for making too narrow a selection and offering too narrow an analysis of political rituals. Their approach is further criticized for closing off a whole range of significant and critical questions about political rituals—questions which bring out their cognitive role and the cognitive dimension of the exercise of power in stratified, conflictual and pluralistic modern industrial societies. Finally, it is suggested that, once those questions are asked, one arrives at a view of many political rituals that pictures them, not as promoting value integration, but as crucial elements in the 'mobilization of bias'.

    AB - The article is concerned with the role played by rituals in the politics of advanced industrial societies. First, after considering the disputes of the anthropologists, a working definition of ritual is offered. The central, critical part of the paper discusses a range of attempts that have been made to apply a particular theory of ritual—the Durkheimian theory—to the politics of modern societies, specifically the United States and Britain. These 'neo-Durkheimian' analyses (of Shils and Young, Blumleret al., Lloyd Warner, Bellah and Verba) are criticized for using too simple a notion of social integration, and for making too narrow a selection and offering too narrow an analysis of political rituals. Their approach is further criticized for closing off a whole range of significant and critical questions about political rituals—questions which bring out their cognitive role and the cognitive dimension of the exercise of power in stratified, conflictual and pluralistic modern industrial societies. Finally, it is suggested that, once those questions are asked, one arrives at a view of many political rituals that pictures them, not as promoting value integration, but as crucial elements in the 'mobilization of bias'.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970242136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970242136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/003803857500900205

    DO - 10.1177/003803857500900205

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84970242136

    VL - 9

    SP - 289

    EP - 308

    JO - Sociology

    JF - Sociology

    SN - 0038-0385

    IS - 2

    ER -