Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An application of system justification theory

Mark R. Hoffarth, Flávio Azevedo, John Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many people in Western societies tolerate the mistreatment of nonhuman animals, despite obvious ethical concerns about the injustice of animal suffering and exploitation. In three studies, we applied system justification theory to examine the ideological basis of human–animal relations. In Studies 1a and 1b, we showed in both a large convenience sample (N = 2,119) and a nationally representative sample in the US (N = 1,500) that economic system justification uniquely explained the relationship between political conservatism and animal welfare attitudes even after adjusting for social dominance orientation. In Study 2, we replicated and extended these findings using more elaborate measures of animal welfare attitudes in the context of an MTurk sample of U.S. respondents (N = 395). Specifically, we found that conservatism was associated with less support for animal welfare and greater endorsement of speciesism (the belief that humans are morally superior to nonhuman animals) and that individual differences in economic system justification mediated these associations. We discuss several ways in which system justification theory may inform interventions designed to promote support for animal welfare in society at large.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)858-878
Number of pages21
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Animal Welfare
System theory
conservatism
Politics
system theory
exploitation
Animals
animal
welfare
Animal Rights
Economics
Social Dominance
economic system
Psychological Stress
Individuality
Nonhuman Animals
Conservatism
Justification
Exploitation
Economic Systems

Keywords

  • animal rights
  • animal welfare
  • conservatism
  • political ideology
  • system justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals : An application of system justification theory. / Hoffarth, Mark R.; Azevedo, Flávio; Jost, John.

In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 22, No. 6, 01.09.2019, p. 858-878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b7c6437dfbd4aa58c472d2d39816db2,
title = "Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An application of system justification theory",
abstract = "Many people in Western societies tolerate the mistreatment of nonhuman animals, despite obvious ethical concerns about the injustice of animal suffering and exploitation. In three studies, we applied system justification theory to examine the ideological basis of human–animal relations. In Studies 1a and 1b, we showed in both a large convenience sample (N = 2,119) and a nationally representative sample in the US (N = 1,500) that economic system justification uniquely explained the relationship between political conservatism and animal welfare attitudes even after adjusting for social dominance orientation. In Study 2, we replicated and extended these findings using more elaborate measures of animal welfare attitudes in the context of an MTurk sample of U.S. respondents (N = 395). Specifically, we found that conservatism was associated with less support for animal welfare and greater endorsement of speciesism (the belief that humans are morally superior to nonhuman animals) and that individual differences in economic system justification mediated these associations. We discuss several ways in which system justification theory may inform interventions designed to promote support for animal welfare in society at large.",
keywords = "animal rights, animal welfare, conservatism, political ideology, system justification",
author = "Hoffarth, {Mark R.} and Fl{\'a}vio Azevedo and John Jost",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1368430219843183",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "858--878",
journal = "Group Processes and Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals

T2 - An application of system justification theory

AU - Hoffarth, Mark R.

AU - Azevedo, Flávio

AU - Jost, John

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Many people in Western societies tolerate the mistreatment of nonhuman animals, despite obvious ethical concerns about the injustice of animal suffering and exploitation. In three studies, we applied system justification theory to examine the ideological basis of human–animal relations. In Studies 1a and 1b, we showed in both a large convenience sample (N = 2,119) and a nationally representative sample in the US (N = 1,500) that economic system justification uniquely explained the relationship between political conservatism and animal welfare attitudes even after adjusting for social dominance orientation. In Study 2, we replicated and extended these findings using more elaborate measures of animal welfare attitudes in the context of an MTurk sample of U.S. respondents (N = 395). Specifically, we found that conservatism was associated with less support for animal welfare and greater endorsement of speciesism (the belief that humans are morally superior to nonhuman animals) and that individual differences in economic system justification mediated these associations. We discuss several ways in which system justification theory may inform interventions designed to promote support for animal welfare in society at large.

AB - Many people in Western societies tolerate the mistreatment of nonhuman animals, despite obvious ethical concerns about the injustice of animal suffering and exploitation. In three studies, we applied system justification theory to examine the ideological basis of human–animal relations. In Studies 1a and 1b, we showed in both a large convenience sample (N = 2,119) and a nationally representative sample in the US (N = 1,500) that economic system justification uniquely explained the relationship between political conservatism and animal welfare attitudes even after adjusting for social dominance orientation. In Study 2, we replicated and extended these findings using more elaborate measures of animal welfare attitudes in the context of an MTurk sample of U.S. respondents (N = 395). Specifically, we found that conservatism was associated with less support for animal welfare and greater endorsement of speciesism (the belief that humans are morally superior to nonhuman animals) and that individual differences in economic system justification mediated these associations. We discuss several ways in which system justification theory may inform interventions designed to promote support for animal welfare in society at large.

KW - animal rights

KW - animal welfare

KW - conservatism

KW - political ideology

KW - system justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072106006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072106006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368430219843183

DO - 10.1177/1368430219843183

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072106006

VL - 22

SP - 858

EP - 878

JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 6

ER -