Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice

Ryan Pevnick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A prominent position in the global justice literature holds that claims of distributive justice are only 'activated' by the densely coercive institutional apparatus of states. I dispute this view in three ways. First, I argue that coercion is either justified by its results and rationale or it cannot be justified at all; as a result, coercive institutions do not demand an independent justification via distributive justice. Second, I contend that because the shape of coercive institutions is the result of political choices that have distributive implications, one cannot make normative judgements without asking why coercive institutions have the shape that they do. Third, even accepting (for the sake of argument) the claim that coercive institutions must be justified by a special focus on distributive justice among those subject to them, I argue that the resulting position does not justify restricting distributive justice to state borders. If (any of) these arguments are correct, it is a mistake to think that a concern with the coercive nature of political institutions legitimates restricting claims of distributive justice to compatriots.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)399-413
    Number of pages15
    JournalPolitical Studies
    Volume56
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2008

    Fingerprint

    distributive justice
    political institution
    justice
    demand

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice. / Pevnick, Ryan.

    In: Political Studies, Vol. 56, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 399-413.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Pevnick, Ryan. / Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice. In: Political Studies. 2008 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 399-413.
    @article{8a2bdea65d574383841bbc06cbae4c3d,
    title = "Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice",
    abstract = "A prominent position in the global justice literature holds that claims of distributive justice are only 'activated' by the densely coercive institutional apparatus of states. I dispute this view in three ways. First, I argue that coercion is either justified by its results and rationale or it cannot be justified at all; as a result, coercive institutions do not demand an independent justification via distributive justice. Second, I contend that because the shape of coercive institutions is the result of political choices that have distributive implications, one cannot make normative judgements without asking why coercive institutions have the shape that they do. Third, even accepting (for the sake of argument) the claim that coercive institutions must be justified by a special focus on distributive justice among those subject to them, I argue that the resulting position does not justify restricting distributive justice to state borders. If (any of) these arguments are correct, it is a mistake to think that a concern with the coercive nature of political institutions legitimates restricting claims of distributive justice to compatriots.",
    author = "Ryan Pevnick",
    year = "2008",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00694.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "56",
    pages = "399--413",
    journal = "Political Studies",
    issn = "0032-3217",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Political coercion and the scope of distributive justice

    AU - Pevnick, Ryan

    PY - 2008/6

    Y1 - 2008/6

    N2 - A prominent position in the global justice literature holds that claims of distributive justice are only 'activated' by the densely coercive institutional apparatus of states. I dispute this view in three ways. First, I argue that coercion is either justified by its results and rationale or it cannot be justified at all; as a result, coercive institutions do not demand an independent justification via distributive justice. Second, I contend that because the shape of coercive institutions is the result of political choices that have distributive implications, one cannot make normative judgements without asking why coercive institutions have the shape that they do. Third, even accepting (for the sake of argument) the claim that coercive institutions must be justified by a special focus on distributive justice among those subject to them, I argue that the resulting position does not justify restricting distributive justice to state borders. If (any of) these arguments are correct, it is a mistake to think that a concern with the coercive nature of political institutions legitimates restricting claims of distributive justice to compatriots.

    AB - A prominent position in the global justice literature holds that claims of distributive justice are only 'activated' by the densely coercive institutional apparatus of states. I dispute this view in three ways. First, I argue that coercion is either justified by its results and rationale or it cannot be justified at all; as a result, coercive institutions do not demand an independent justification via distributive justice. Second, I contend that because the shape of coercive institutions is the result of political choices that have distributive implications, one cannot make normative judgements without asking why coercive institutions have the shape that they do. Third, even accepting (for the sake of argument) the claim that coercive institutions must be justified by a special focus on distributive justice among those subject to them, I argue that the resulting position does not justify restricting distributive justice to state borders. If (any of) these arguments are correct, it is a mistake to think that a concern with the coercive nature of political institutions legitimates restricting claims of distributive justice to compatriots.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149155468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42149155468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00694.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00694.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 56

    SP - 399

    EP - 413

    JO - Political Studies

    JF - Political Studies

    SN - 0032-3217

    IS - 2

    ER -