Policy implications

Giorgia Brunello, Pietro Garibaldi, Etienne Wasmer

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationEducation and Training in Europe
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Electronic)9780191705786
    ISBN (Print)9780199210978
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 17 2007

    Fingerprint

    Policy implications
    Finance
    Education system
    Tertiary education
    Social security
    Health
    Education
    Public deficit
    Funding
    Public spending
    Household
    Public debt
    Fees
    Pensions
    Secondary education
    Enrollment
    European countries
    Private money
    Schooling
    Stability and Growth Pact

    Keywords

    • Educational funding
    • Educational policy
    • Educational reforms
    • European education
    • Higher education
    • Labour market
    • Public spending

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    Brunello, G., Garibaldi, P., & Wasmer, E. (2007). Policy implications. In Education and Training in Europe Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

    Policy implications. / Brunello, Giorgia; Garibaldi, Pietro; Wasmer, Etienne.

    Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Brunello, G, Garibaldi, P & Wasmer, E 2007, Policy implications. in Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008
    Brunello G, Garibaldi P, Wasmer E. Policy implications. In Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press. 2007 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008
    Brunello, Giorgia ; Garibaldi, Pietro ; Wasmer, Etienne. / Policy implications. Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2007.
    @inbook{420caefef7e4463ebef25b9c8a1cddc9,
    title = "Policy implications",
    abstract = "This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.",
    keywords = "Educational funding, Educational policy, Educational reforms, European education, Higher education, Labour market, Public spending",
    author = "Giorgia Brunello and Pietro Garibaldi and Etienne Wasmer",
    year = "2007",
    month = "5",
    day = "17",
    doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780199210978",
    booktitle = "Education and Training in Europe",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Policy implications

    AU - Brunello, Giorgia

    AU - Garibaldi, Pietro

    AU - Wasmer, Etienne

    PY - 2007/5/17

    Y1 - 2007/5/17

    N2 - This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

    AB - This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

    KW - Educational funding

    KW - Educational policy

    KW - Educational reforms

    KW - European education

    KW - Higher education

    KW - Labour market

    KW - Public spending

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923065831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923065831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

    DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780199210978

    BT - Education and Training in Europe

    PB - Oxford University Press

    ER -