Policy implications

Giorgia Brunello, Pietro Garibaldi, Etienne Wasmer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEducation and Training in Europe
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191705786
ISBN (Print)9780199210978
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 2007

Fingerprint

Policy implications
Finance
Education system
Tertiary education
Social security
Health
Public deficit
Education
Funding
Public spending
Household
Public debt
Fees
Pensions
Enrollment
Secondary education
European countries
Stability and Growth Pact
Schooling
Private money

Keywords

  • Educational funding
  • Educational policy
  • Educational reforms
  • European education
  • Higher education
  • Labour market
  • Public spending

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Brunello, G., Garibaldi, P., & Wasmer, E. (2007). Policy implications. In Education and Training in Europe Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

Policy implications. / Brunello, Giorgia; Garibaldi, Pietro; Wasmer, Etienne.

Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Brunello, G, Garibaldi, P & Wasmer, E 2007, Policy implications. in Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008
Brunello G, Garibaldi P, Wasmer E. Policy implications. In Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press. 2007 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008
Brunello, Giorgia ; Garibaldi, Pietro ; Wasmer, Etienne. / Policy implications. Education and Training in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2007.
@inbook{420caefef7e4463ebef25b9c8a1cddc9,
title = "Policy implications",
abstract = "This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.",
keywords = "Educational funding, Educational policy, Educational reforms, European education, Higher education, Labour market, Public spending",
author = "Giorgia Brunello and Pietro Garibaldi and Etienne Wasmer",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199210978",
booktitle = "Education and Training in Europe",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Policy implications

AU - Brunello, Giorgia

AU - Garibaldi, Pietro

AU - Wasmer, Etienne

PY - 2007/5/17

Y1 - 2007/5/17

N2 - This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

AB - This chapter examines a few policy implications with respect to education and skills in Europe. Education systems in Europe have done a good job at supplying basic skills, thus suggesting that primary and secondary schooling in Europe functions relatively well. In contrast, where tertiary education is concerned, both enrolment and funding are substantially lower in Europe than in the US. The share of GDP devoted to higher education is three times less (2 percentage points lower) in Europe than in the US. One of the highest priorities should be to reduce this gap. There are three possibilities for this objective to be achieved. The first one is to re-allocate public spending away from secondary to tertiary education. However, this may not be desirable, given the evidence that well-financed secondary education may be one reason why Europe has experienced less inequality than the US. A second option is to raise the level of public deficit and public debt in order to increase spending on higher education. This is as unrealistic and undesirable as the first option: European countries already face tensions to increase finance for their social security (health and pensions), and are bound to a large extent by the Stability and Growth Pact. The third option is to open the doors to the possibility that private money should finance part of the education system. This could come partly from household money, by raising university fees by moderate amounts.

KW - Educational funding

KW - Educational policy

KW - Educational reforms

KW - European education

KW - Higher education

KW - Labour market

KW - Public spending

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923065831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923065831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199210978.003.0008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780199210978

BT - Education and Training in Europe

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -