Pieter Bruegels Kruisdraging

een proeve van ‘close-reading’

Reindert Falkenburg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The article is a contribution to the iconologv of sixteenth century landscape-painting, and sets out to examine in particular the con nection between the antithcthical iconography of the figurai element in landscapes by Joachim Patinir, Herri met de Bles and Jan van Amstel, and Pieter Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross in Vicn na. Also presented and elucidated is the thesis that in this painting Bruegel anticipated with many details the subjective element in the sixteenth-century beholder’s interpretation, and that this subjective element in the reading of the image was anchored in the ‘collective’ imagery of early sixteenth-century landscape-painting. The author endeavours to demonstrate that the manner of reception prompted by Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross is comparable with that required of the beholder of Jan van Am- stel’s landscape with Christ Bearing the Cross in Stuttgart. The uncertainty of the beholder faced with the question of whether a particular subjective interpretation of an individual detail or certain anecdote is ‘correct’ should not only be seen as a problem for the twentieth-century iconologist but is inherent in the actual painting, and must be judged as a positive element, intended by the painter, in the reception of the image. The beholder’s personal insight and judgement in issues of good and evil arc the true subject of these paintings.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)17-33
    Number of pages17
    JournalOud Holland
    Volume107
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

    Fingerprint

    Beholder
    Close Reading
    Christ
    Reception
    Landscape Painting
    Iconography
    Stuttgart
    Painters
    Uncertainty
    Anecdote
    Imagery
    Evil

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

    Cite this

    Pieter Bruegels Kruisdraging : een proeve van ‘close-reading’. / Falkenburg, Reindert.

    In: Oud Holland, Vol. 107, No. 1, 01.01.1993, p. 17-33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Falkenburg, Reindert. / Pieter Bruegels Kruisdraging : een proeve van ‘close-reading’. In: Oud Holland. 1993 ; Vol. 107, No. 1. pp. 17-33.
    @article{3fbe330cdc4b43208c581677b0385649,
    title = "Pieter Bruegels Kruisdraging: een proeve van ‘close-reading’",
    abstract = "The article is a contribution to the iconologv of sixteenth century landscape-painting, and sets out to examine in particular the con nection between the antithcthical iconography of the figurai element in landscapes by Joachim Patinir, Herri met de Bles and Jan van Amstel, and Pieter Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross in Vicn na. Also presented and elucidated is the thesis that in this painting Bruegel anticipated with many details the subjective element in the sixteenth-century beholder’s interpretation, and that this subjective element in the reading of the image was anchored in the ‘collective’ imagery of early sixteenth-century landscape-painting. The author endeavours to demonstrate that the manner of reception prompted by Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross is comparable with that required of the beholder of Jan van Am- stel’s landscape with Christ Bearing the Cross in Stuttgart. The uncertainty of the beholder faced with the question of whether a particular subjective interpretation of an individual detail or certain anecdote is ‘correct’ should not only be seen as a problem for the twentieth-century iconologist but is inherent in the actual painting, and must be judged as a positive element, intended by the painter, in the reception of the image. The beholder’s personal insight and judgement in issues of good and evil arc the true subject of these paintings.",
    author = "Reindert Falkenburg",
    year = "1993",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1163/187501793X00081",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "107",
    pages = "17--33",
    journal = "Oud Holland",
    issn = "0030-672X",
    publisher = "Brill",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pieter Bruegels Kruisdraging

    T2 - een proeve van ‘close-reading’

    AU - Falkenburg, Reindert

    PY - 1993/1/1

    Y1 - 1993/1/1

    N2 - The article is a contribution to the iconologv of sixteenth century landscape-painting, and sets out to examine in particular the con nection between the antithcthical iconography of the figurai element in landscapes by Joachim Patinir, Herri met de Bles and Jan van Amstel, and Pieter Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross in Vicn na. Also presented and elucidated is the thesis that in this painting Bruegel anticipated with many details the subjective element in the sixteenth-century beholder’s interpretation, and that this subjective element in the reading of the image was anchored in the ‘collective’ imagery of early sixteenth-century landscape-painting. The author endeavours to demonstrate that the manner of reception prompted by Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross is comparable with that required of the beholder of Jan van Am- stel’s landscape with Christ Bearing the Cross in Stuttgart. The uncertainty of the beholder faced with the question of whether a particular subjective interpretation of an individual detail or certain anecdote is ‘correct’ should not only be seen as a problem for the twentieth-century iconologist but is inherent in the actual painting, and must be judged as a positive element, intended by the painter, in the reception of the image. The beholder’s personal insight and judgement in issues of good and evil arc the true subject of these paintings.

    AB - The article is a contribution to the iconologv of sixteenth century landscape-painting, and sets out to examine in particular the con nection between the antithcthical iconography of the figurai element in landscapes by Joachim Patinir, Herri met de Bles and Jan van Amstel, and Pieter Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross in Vicn na. Also presented and elucidated is the thesis that in this painting Bruegel anticipated with many details the subjective element in the sixteenth-century beholder’s interpretation, and that this subjective element in the reading of the image was anchored in the ‘collective’ imagery of early sixteenth-century landscape-painting. The author endeavours to demonstrate that the manner of reception prompted by Bruegei’s Christ Bearing the Cross is comparable with that required of the beholder of Jan van Am- stel’s landscape with Christ Bearing the Cross in Stuttgart. The uncertainty of the beholder faced with the question of whether a particular subjective interpretation of an individual detail or certain anecdote is ‘correct’ should not only be seen as a problem for the twentieth-century iconologist but is inherent in the actual painting, and must be judged as a positive element, intended by the painter, in the reception of the image. The beholder’s personal insight and judgement in issues of good and evil arc the true subject of these paintings.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958298335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958298335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1163/187501793X00081

    DO - 10.1163/187501793X00081

    M3 - Article

    VL - 107

    SP - 17

    EP - 33

    JO - Oud Holland

    JF - Oud Holland

    SN - 0030-672X

    IS - 1

    ER -