Philosophy & its classical past

Phillip Mitsis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The notion that philosophers can abandon their history and set their arguments on new foundations has a long history. One strain of recent philosophy that traces its roots to Frege has been particularly confident in this regard, and its rejection of a classical past has had widespread influences on the study of ancient philosophy over the past several decades. With the waning of this recent paradigm, however, the possibility of philosophical engagement between the old and new has again led to significant work in several areas of philosophy. I concentrate on one of these, the philosophy of death, and also ask whether ancient philosophy might furnish models that enable contemporary philosophers to rise above their specialisms and address crucial issues in a public discourse, allowing for both mutual intelligibility and criticism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalDaedalus
Volume145
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

history
criticism
philosophy
Philosophy
paradigm
death
discourse
History
Philosopher
Ancient Philosophy
Paradigm
Mutual Intelligibility
Criticism
Gottlob Frege
Rejection
Public Discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Philosophy & its classical past. / Mitsis, Phillip.

In: Daedalus, Vol. 145, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 59-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitsis, P 2016, 'Philosophy & its classical past', Daedalus, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00376
Mitsis, Phillip. / Philosophy & its classical past. In: Daedalus. 2016 ; Vol. 145, No. 2. pp. 59-67.
@article{13c5df959973443db801c1a4d00a8abe,
title = "Philosophy & its classical past",
abstract = "The notion that philosophers can abandon their history and set their arguments on new foundations has a long history. One strain of recent philosophy that traces its roots to Frege has been particularly confident in this regard, and its rejection of a classical past has had widespread influences on the study of ancient philosophy over the past several decades. With the waning of this recent paradigm, however, the possibility of philosophical engagement between the old and new has again led to significant work in several areas of philosophy. I concentrate on one of these, the philosophy of death, and also ask whether ancient philosophy might furnish models that enable contemporary philosophers to rise above their specialisms and address crucial issues in a public discourse, allowing for both mutual intelligibility and criticism.",
author = "Phillip Mitsis",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1162/DAED_a_00376",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "59--67",
journal = "Daedalus",
issn = "0011-5266",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Philosophy & its classical past

AU - Mitsis, Phillip

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The notion that philosophers can abandon their history and set their arguments on new foundations has a long history. One strain of recent philosophy that traces its roots to Frege has been particularly confident in this regard, and its rejection of a classical past has had widespread influences on the study of ancient philosophy over the past several decades. With the waning of this recent paradigm, however, the possibility of philosophical engagement between the old and new has again led to significant work in several areas of philosophy. I concentrate on one of these, the philosophy of death, and also ask whether ancient philosophy might furnish models that enable contemporary philosophers to rise above their specialisms and address crucial issues in a public discourse, allowing for both mutual intelligibility and criticism.

AB - The notion that philosophers can abandon their history and set their arguments on new foundations has a long history. One strain of recent philosophy that traces its roots to Frege has been particularly confident in this regard, and its rejection of a classical past has had widespread influences on the study of ancient philosophy over the past several decades. With the waning of this recent paradigm, however, the possibility of philosophical engagement between the old and new has again led to significant work in several areas of philosophy. I concentrate on one of these, the philosophy of death, and also ask whether ancient philosophy might furnish models that enable contemporary philosophers to rise above their specialisms and address crucial issues in a public discourse, allowing for both mutual intelligibility and criticism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962786973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962786973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/DAED_a_00376

DO - 10.1162/DAED_a_00376

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 59

EP - 67

JO - Daedalus

JF - Daedalus

SN - 0011-5266

IS - 2

ER -