Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment

Andrew Bell, Wei Zhang, Keosothea Nou

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Shifting agricultural land management to one that promotes the use of biological control alongside insecticide spray, requires two key elements: 1) habitat for natural enemies provided by non-crop area within the agricultural landscape, and 2) judicious use of insecticides by farmers. However, barriers to adoption may include low levels of knowledge regarding pests and natural enemies, and the difficulties associated with coordinating among community members. The acts of practicing cautious spraying and of leaving aside land as non-crop habitat (NCH) for natural enemies incur private costs for benefits shared by the community. In this study we tie together several objectives within the analysis of a framed field experiment built around pest management decisions in a smallholder agricultural context. We present results from a within-subjects design (multiple treatments per game group) that estimates a decision model which links behavior back to characteristics of the game, the players, and their group. We examine the relative role these sets of characteristics have in explaining variations in the modeled decisions, including how farmers respond to a nudge (a flat subsidy for allowing land to sit as non-crop habitat) to promote natural enemy services on the land. We observe that group-level characteristics appear to have the greatest roles in explaining how decisions by individuals are made. That is to say, the decision of whether to adopt greater use of NCH has more to do with those around the farmer than the traits of the farmer him or herself. From a policy point of view, it is a signal that (if such game outcomes have any bearing on farm-level decisions) conventional data tools (such as household-level data products from household surveys or censuses) may be inadequate in evaluating appropriate incentives, and newer approaches that identify social networks and neighbor/community interactions may be important.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalAgricultural Systems
    Volume143
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    collaborative management
    natural enemies
    pesticides
    farmers
    habitats
    insecticides
    household surveys
    social networks
    subsidies
    pest management
    land management
    spraying
    agricultural land
    households
    biological control
    pests
    farms

    Keywords

    • Cambodia
    • Coordination game
    • Framed field experiment
    • Insect-based ecosystem services
    • Pesticide use

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agronomy and Crop Science
    • Animal Science and Zoology

    Cite this

    Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment. / Bell, Andrew; Zhang, Wei; Nou, Keosothea.

    In: Agricultural Systems, Vol. 143, 01.03.2016, p. 1-13.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bell, Andrew ; Zhang, Wei ; Nou, Keosothea. / Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment. In: Agricultural Systems. 2016 ; Vol. 143. pp. 1-13.
    @article{bc834345fd9e4af88c8d7ca40815207a,
    title = "Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment",
    abstract = "Shifting agricultural land management to one that promotes the use of biological control alongside insecticide spray, requires two key elements: 1) habitat for natural enemies provided by non-crop area within the agricultural landscape, and 2) judicious use of insecticides by farmers. However, barriers to adoption may include low levels of knowledge regarding pests and natural enemies, and the difficulties associated with coordinating among community members. The acts of practicing cautious spraying and of leaving aside land as non-crop habitat (NCH) for natural enemies incur private costs for benefits shared by the community. In this study we tie together several objectives within the analysis of a framed field experiment built around pest management decisions in a smallholder agricultural context. We present results from a within-subjects design (multiple treatments per game group) that estimates a decision model which links behavior back to characteristics of the game, the players, and their group. We examine the relative role these sets of characteristics have in explaining variations in the modeled decisions, including how farmers respond to a nudge (a flat subsidy for allowing land to sit as non-crop habitat) to promote natural enemy services on the land. We observe that group-level characteristics appear to have the greatest roles in explaining how decisions by individuals are made. That is to say, the decision of whether to adopt greater use of NCH has more to do with those around the farmer than the traits of the farmer him or herself. From a policy point of view, it is a signal that (if such game outcomes have any bearing on farm-level decisions) conventional data tools (such as household-level data products from household surveys or censuses) may be inadequate in evaluating appropriate incentives, and newer approaches that identify social networks and neighbor/community interactions may be important.",
    keywords = "Cambodia, Coordination game, Framed field experiment, Insect-based ecosystem services, Pesticide use",
    author = "Andrew Bell and Wei Zhang and Keosothea Nou",
    year = "2016",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.012",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "143",
    pages = "1--13",
    journal = "Agricultural Systems",
    issn = "0308-521X",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    AU - Zhang, Wei

    AU - Nou, Keosothea

    PY - 2016/3/1

    Y1 - 2016/3/1

    N2 - Shifting agricultural land management to one that promotes the use of biological control alongside insecticide spray, requires two key elements: 1) habitat for natural enemies provided by non-crop area within the agricultural landscape, and 2) judicious use of insecticides by farmers. However, barriers to adoption may include low levels of knowledge regarding pests and natural enemies, and the difficulties associated with coordinating among community members. The acts of practicing cautious spraying and of leaving aside land as non-crop habitat (NCH) for natural enemies incur private costs for benefits shared by the community. In this study we tie together several objectives within the analysis of a framed field experiment built around pest management decisions in a smallholder agricultural context. We present results from a within-subjects design (multiple treatments per game group) that estimates a decision model which links behavior back to characteristics of the game, the players, and their group. We examine the relative role these sets of characteristics have in explaining variations in the modeled decisions, including how farmers respond to a nudge (a flat subsidy for allowing land to sit as non-crop habitat) to promote natural enemy services on the land. We observe that group-level characteristics appear to have the greatest roles in explaining how decisions by individuals are made. That is to say, the decision of whether to adopt greater use of NCH has more to do with those around the farmer than the traits of the farmer him or herself. From a policy point of view, it is a signal that (if such game outcomes have any bearing on farm-level decisions) conventional data tools (such as household-level data products from household surveys or censuses) may be inadequate in evaluating appropriate incentives, and newer approaches that identify social networks and neighbor/community interactions may be important.

    AB - Shifting agricultural land management to one that promotes the use of biological control alongside insecticide spray, requires two key elements: 1) habitat for natural enemies provided by non-crop area within the agricultural landscape, and 2) judicious use of insecticides by farmers. However, barriers to adoption may include low levels of knowledge regarding pests and natural enemies, and the difficulties associated with coordinating among community members. The acts of practicing cautious spraying and of leaving aside land as non-crop habitat (NCH) for natural enemies incur private costs for benefits shared by the community. In this study we tie together several objectives within the analysis of a framed field experiment built around pest management decisions in a smallholder agricultural context. We present results from a within-subjects design (multiple treatments per game group) that estimates a decision model which links behavior back to characteristics of the game, the players, and their group. We examine the relative role these sets of characteristics have in explaining variations in the modeled decisions, including how farmers respond to a nudge (a flat subsidy for allowing land to sit as non-crop habitat) to promote natural enemy services on the land. We observe that group-level characteristics appear to have the greatest roles in explaining how decisions by individuals are made. That is to say, the decision of whether to adopt greater use of NCH has more to do with those around the farmer than the traits of the farmer him or herself. From a policy point of view, it is a signal that (if such game outcomes have any bearing on farm-level decisions) conventional data tools (such as household-level data products from household surveys or censuses) may be inadequate in evaluating appropriate incentives, and newer approaches that identify social networks and neighbor/community interactions may be important.

    KW - Cambodia

    KW - Coordination game

    KW - Framed field experiment

    KW - Insect-based ecosystem services

    KW - Pesticide use

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949488486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949488486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 143

    SP - 1

    EP - 13

    JO - Agricultural Systems

    JF - Agricultural Systems

    SN - 0308-521X

    ER -