Perspective

Challenges and controversial issues in the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1980-2015

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since 1980, every edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) has recommended increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, but reduced consumption of saturated fat, sugars, and sodium and, therefore, their primary food sources. Every edition has generated controversy, mainly from producers of foods affected by "eat less" recommendations, particularly meat. Objections to the 2015 DGAs focused on environmental aswell as scientific issues, but also on purported conflicts of interest amongmembers of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. On this basis, critics induced Congress to authorize the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) to review the process of drawing up the guidelines. The NAM's 2017 reports should strengthen the process, but as long as science continues to support advice to reduce consumption of targeted foods, the guidelines will continue to elicit political controversy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-150
Number of pages3
JournalAdvances in Nutrition
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Nutrition Policy
Dietary Guidelines
Food
Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
whole grain foods
fruit consumption
Advisory Committees
committees
Vegetables
Meat
food industry
Fruit
medicine
Sodium
vegetables
Fats
Medicine
sodium
meat

Keywords

  • Dietary guidelines
  • Food policy
  • Meat industry
  • Public health
  • Public policy
  • Science vs. politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Perspective : Challenges and controversial issues in the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1980-2015. / Nestle, Marion.

In: Advances in Nutrition, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 148-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7452e9ca009c4b93b822555ce58f0cce,
title = "Perspective: Challenges and controversial issues in the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1980-2015",
abstract = "Since 1980, every edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) has recommended increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, but reduced consumption of saturated fat, sugars, and sodium and, therefore, their primary food sources. Every edition has generated controversy, mainly from producers of foods affected by {"}eat less{"} recommendations, particularly meat. Objections to the 2015 DGAs focused on environmental aswell as scientific issues, but also on purported conflicts of interest amongmembers of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. On this basis, critics induced Congress to authorize the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) to review the process of drawing up the guidelines. The NAM's 2017 reports should strengthen the process, but as long as science continues to support advice to reduce consumption of targeted foods, the guidelines will continue to elicit political controversy.",
keywords = "Dietary guidelines, Food policy, Meat industry, Public health, Public policy, Science vs. politics",
author = "Marion Nestle",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/advances/nmx022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "148--150",
journal = "Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)",
issn = "2161-8313",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspective

T2 - Challenges and controversial issues in the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1980-2015

AU - Nestle, Marion

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Since 1980, every edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) has recommended increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, but reduced consumption of saturated fat, sugars, and sodium and, therefore, their primary food sources. Every edition has generated controversy, mainly from producers of foods affected by "eat less" recommendations, particularly meat. Objections to the 2015 DGAs focused on environmental aswell as scientific issues, but also on purported conflicts of interest amongmembers of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. On this basis, critics induced Congress to authorize the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) to review the process of drawing up the guidelines. The NAM's 2017 reports should strengthen the process, but as long as science continues to support advice to reduce consumption of targeted foods, the guidelines will continue to elicit political controversy.

AB - Since 1980, every edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) has recommended increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, but reduced consumption of saturated fat, sugars, and sodium and, therefore, their primary food sources. Every edition has generated controversy, mainly from producers of foods affected by "eat less" recommendations, particularly meat. Objections to the 2015 DGAs focused on environmental aswell as scientific issues, but also on purported conflicts of interest amongmembers of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. On this basis, critics induced Congress to authorize the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) to review the process of drawing up the guidelines. The NAM's 2017 reports should strengthen the process, but as long as science continues to support advice to reduce consumption of targeted foods, the guidelines will continue to elicit political controversy.

KW - Dietary guidelines

KW - Food policy

KW - Meat industry

KW - Public health

KW - Public policy

KW - Science vs. politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045279933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045279933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/advances/nmx022

DO - 10.1093/advances/nmx022

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 148

EP - 150

JO - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

JF - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

SN - 2161-8313

IS - 2

ER -