Personality Differences in Spontaneous Personality Inferences at Encoding

James S. Uleman, Wayne C. Winborne, Laraine Winter, David Shechter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition to HF and LF subjects. Then 77 HF and LF subjects read both sets of sentences for a "memory study." Consensual dispositions and semantic associates to the actors were used to cue recall. For the first set, there was a significant interaction between subject type, sentence type, and cue type. LF dispositions were more effective retrieval cues for LF than for HF subjects. Subjects had very little accurate awareness of having made trait inferences. No significant effects were found for HF cues alone or for the second sentence set. Results indicated that HF and LF subjects differ in their spontaneous social inferences about others and have little awareness of making these inferences. Implications for integrating trait and cognitive approaches to personality are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-403
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1986

Fingerprint

Cues
Personality
personality
disposition
Authoritarianism
Semantics
event
authoritarianism
semantics
interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Personality Differences in Spontaneous Personality Inferences at Encoding. / Uleman, James S.; Winborne, Wayne C.; Winter, Laraine; Shechter, David.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 2, 08.1986, p. 396-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uleman, James S. ; Winborne, Wayne C. ; Winter, Laraine ; Shechter, David. / Personality Differences in Spontaneous Personality Inferences at Encoding. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 396-403.
@article{debce6b0aa9b416ebccba25c98d98d07,
title = "Personality Differences in Spontaneous Personality Inferences at Encoding",
abstract = "In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition to HF and LF subjects. Then 77 HF and LF subjects read both sets of sentences for a {"}memory study.{"} Consensual dispositions and semantic associates to the actors were used to cue recall. For the first set, there was a significant interaction between subject type, sentence type, and cue type. LF dispositions were more effective retrieval cues for LF than for HF subjects. Subjects had very little accurate awareness of having made trait inferences. No significant effects were found for HF cues alone or for the second sentence set. Results indicated that HF and LF subjects differ in their spontaneous social inferences about others and have little awareness of making these inferences. Implications for integrating trait and cognitive approaches to personality are discussed.",
author = "Uleman, {James S.} and Winborne, {Wayne C.} and Laraine Winter and David Shechter",
year = "1986",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "396--403",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personality Differences in Spontaneous Personality Inferences at Encoding

AU - Uleman, James S.

AU - Winborne, Wayne C.

AU - Winter, Laraine

AU - Shechter, David

PY - 1986/8

Y1 - 1986/8

N2 - In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition to HF and LF subjects. Then 77 HF and LF subjects read both sets of sentences for a "memory study." Consensual dispositions and semantic associates to the actors were used to cue recall. For the first set, there was a significant interaction between subject type, sentence type, and cue type. LF dispositions were more effective retrieval cues for LF than for HF subjects. Subjects had very little accurate awareness of having made trait inferences. No significant effects were found for HF cues alone or for the second sentence set. Results indicated that HF and LF subjects differ in their spontaneous social inferences about others and have little awareness of making these inferences. Implications for integrating trait and cognitive approaches to personality are discussed.

AB - In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition to HF and LF subjects. Then 77 HF and LF subjects read both sets of sentences for a "memory study." Consensual dispositions and semantic associates to the actors were used to cue recall. For the first set, there was a significant interaction between subject type, sentence type, and cue type. LF dispositions were more effective retrieval cues for LF than for HF subjects. Subjects had very little accurate awareness of having made trait inferences. No significant effects were found for HF cues alone or for the second sentence set. Results indicated that HF and LF subjects differ in their spontaneous social inferences about others and have little awareness of making these inferences. Implications for integrating trait and cognitive approaches to personality are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002036907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002036907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.396

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.396

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002036907

VL - 51

SP - 396

EP - 403

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -