Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology

John A. Martin, Ashley C. Grill, Abigail G. Matthews, Don Vena, Van P. Thompson, Ronald Craig, Frederick A. Curro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The randomized case presentation (RCP) study is designed to assess the degree of diagnostic accuracy for described periodontal cases. This is to lay the basis for practitioner calibration in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network for future clinical studies. Methods: The RCP consisted of 10 case scenarios ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis. Respondents were asked to diagnose the described cases. Survey diagnoses were compared to two existing classifications of periodontal disease status. The RCP was administered via a proprietary electronic data capture system maintained by the PEARL Data Coordinating Center. Standard analytic techniques, including frequency counts and cross-tabulations, were used for categorical data with mean and standard deviation and median values reported for continuous data elements. Results: Demonstrable variations in periodontal assessment for health, gingivitis, and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were found among the 130 PEARL general practitioners who participated in the RCP survey. The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88%) and the lowest for gingivitis (55%). The highest percentage of variation was found in cases with health and gingivitis. Conclusions: There was variation among PEARL practitioners in periodontal diagnosis that may affect treatment outcomes. Our findings add clinical support to recent publications suggesting a need for standardization of terminology in periodontitis diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)606-613
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Gingivitis
Terminology
Periodontitis
Learning
Research
Health
Periodontal Diseases
Dentists
Information Systems
General Practitioners
Calibration
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Dental dictionary
  • Dental records
  • Dental research
  • International classification of disease codes
  • Periodontal diseases
  • Terminology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Martin, J. A., Grill, A. C., Matthews, A. G., Vena, D., Thompson, V. P., Craig, R., & Curro, F. A. (2013). Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology. Journal of Periodontology, 84(5), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110743

Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology. / Martin, John A.; Grill, Ashley C.; Matthews, Abigail G.; Vena, Don; Thompson, Van P.; Craig, Ronald; Curro, Frederick A.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 84, No. 5, 04.2013, p. 606-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, JA, Grill, AC, Matthews, AG, Vena, D, Thompson, VP, Craig, R & Curro, FA 2013, 'Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology', Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110743
Martin JA, Grill AC, Matthews AG, Vena D, Thompson VP, Craig R et al. Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology. Journal of Periodontology. 2013 Apr;84(5):606-613. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110743
Martin, John A. ; Grill, Ashley C. ; Matthews, Abigail G. ; Vena, Don ; Thompson, Van P. ; Craig, Ronald ; Curro, Frederick A. / Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology. In: Journal of Periodontology. 2013 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 606-613.
@article{02b3f184cc5549ff82794fa656b92d47,
title = "Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology",
abstract = "Background: The randomized case presentation (RCP) study is designed to assess the degree of diagnostic accuracy for described periodontal cases. This is to lay the basis for practitioner calibration in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network for future clinical studies. Methods: The RCP consisted of 10 case scenarios ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis. Respondents were asked to diagnose the described cases. Survey diagnoses were compared to two existing classifications of periodontal disease status. The RCP was administered via a proprietary electronic data capture system maintained by the PEARL Data Coordinating Center. Standard analytic techniques, including frequency counts and cross-tabulations, were used for categorical data with mean and standard deviation and median values reported for continuous data elements. Results: Demonstrable variations in periodontal assessment for health, gingivitis, and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were found among the 130 PEARL general practitioners who participated in the RCP survey. The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88{\%}) and the lowest for gingivitis (55{\%}). The highest percentage of variation was found in cases with health and gingivitis. Conclusions: There was variation among PEARL practitioners in periodontal diagnosis that may affect treatment outcomes. Our findings add clinical support to recent publications suggesting a need for standardization of terminology in periodontitis diagnosis.",
keywords = "Dental dictionary, Dental records, Dental research, International classification of disease codes, Periodontal diseases, Terminology",
author = "Martin, {John A.} and Grill, {Ashley C.} and Matthews, {Abigail G.} and Don Vena and Thompson, {Van P.} and Ronald Craig and Curro, {Frederick A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2012.110743",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "606--613",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Periodontal diagnosis affected by variation in terminology

AU - Martin, John A.

AU - Grill, Ashley C.

AU - Matthews, Abigail G.

AU - Vena, Don

AU - Thompson, Van P.

AU - Craig, Ronald

AU - Curro, Frederick A.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background: The randomized case presentation (RCP) study is designed to assess the degree of diagnostic accuracy for described periodontal cases. This is to lay the basis for practitioner calibration in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network for future clinical studies. Methods: The RCP consisted of 10 case scenarios ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis. Respondents were asked to diagnose the described cases. Survey diagnoses were compared to two existing classifications of periodontal disease status. The RCP was administered via a proprietary electronic data capture system maintained by the PEARL Data Coordinating Center. Standard analytic techniques, including frequency counts and cross-tabulations, were used for categorical data with mean and standard deviation and median values reported for continuous data elements. Results: Demonstrable variations in periodontal assessment for health, gingivitis, and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were found among the 130 PEARL general practitioners who participated in the RCP survey. The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88%) and the lowest for gingivitis (55%). The highest percentage of variation was found in cases with health and gingivitis. Conclusions: There was variation among PEARL practitioners in periodontal diagnosis that may affect treatment outcomes. Our findings add clinical support to recent publications suggesting a need for standardization of terminology in periodontitis diagnosis.

AB - Background: The randomized case presentation (RCP) study is designed to assess the degree of diagnostic accuracy for described periodontal cases. This is to lay the basis for practitioner calibration in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network for future clinical studies. Methods: The RCP consisted of 10 case scenarios ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis. Respondents were asked to diagnose the described cases. Survey diagnoses were compared to two existing classifications of periodontal disease status. The RCP was administered via a proprietary electronic data capture system maintained by the PEARL Data Coordinating Center. Standard analytic techniques, including frequency counts and cross-tabulations, were used for categorical data with mean and standard deviation and median values reported for continuous data elements. Results: Demonstrable variations in periodontal assessment for health, gingivitis, and mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were found among the 130 PEARL general practitioners who participated in the RCP survey. The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88%) and the lowest for gingivitis (55%). The highest percentage of variation was found in cases with health and gingivitis. Conclusions: There was variation among PEARL practitioners in periodontal diagnosis that may affect treatment outcomes. Our findings add clinical support to recent publications suggesting a need for standardization of terminology in periodontitis diagnosis.

KW - Dental dictionary

KW - Dental records

KW - Dental research

KW - International classification of disease codes

KW - Periodontal diseases

KW - Terminology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877126170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877126170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2012.110743

DO - 10.1902/jop.2012.110743

M3 - Article

C2 - 22702518

AN - SCOPUS:84877126170

VL - 84

SP - 606

EP - 613

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 5

ER -