Performance measurement for managing infrastructure assets

Detlof Von Winterfeldt, Rae Zimmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Performance measures are central to managing infrastructure assets, since they provide quantitative benchmarks and express values and preferences that are important for decision making. For example, one performance measure for decisions on upgrading an electrical power line is the improvement in service reliability, measured in terms of annual customer interruption hours. This paper first presents an overall framework for developing performance measures for infrastructure decision-making. The framework is then illustrated with an example that involves a decision of whether or not to place overhead power lines underground in order to improve performance measured as service reliability, health and safety, operation and maintenance cost, and impacts on property values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-36
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume4337
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 3 2001

Fingerprint

Performance Measurement
Performance Measures
Infrastructure
Decision making
power lines
decision making
Decision Making
Line
Health
Annual
upgrading
interruption
Maintenance
Express
Customers
Safety
Benchmark
maintenance
health
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Performance measurement for managing infrastructure assets. / Von Winterfeldt, Detlof; Zimmerman, Rae.

In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 4337, No. 1, 03.08.2001, p. 28-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9319987c5f8487b8c86861ac2c47965,
title = "Performance measurement for managing infrastructure assets",
abstract = "Performance measures are central to managing infrastructure assets, since they provide quantitative benchmarks and express values and preferences that are important for decision making. For example, one performance measure for decisions on upgrading an electrical power line is the improvement in service reliability, measured in terms of annual customer interruption hours. This paper first presents an overall framework for developing performance measures for infrastructure decision-making. The framework is then illustrated with an example that involves a decision of whether or not to place overhead power lines underground in order to improve performance measured as service reliability, health and safety, operation and maintenance cost, and impacts on property values.",
author = "{Von Winterfeldt}, Detlof and Rae Zimmerman",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1117/12.435593",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4337",
pages = "28--36",
journal = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
issn = "0277-786X",
publisher = "SPIE",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance measurement for managing infrastructure assets

AU - Von Winterfeldt, Detlof

AU - Zimmerman, Rae

PY - 2001/8/3

Y1 - 2001/8/3

N2 - Performance measures are central to managing infrastructure assets, since they provide quantitative benchmarks and express values and preferences that are important for decision making. For example, one performance measure for decisions on upgrading an electrical power line is the improvement in service reliability, measured in terms of annual customer interruption hours. This paper first presents an overall framework for developing performance measures for infrastructure decision-making. The framework is then illustrated with an example that involves a decision of whether or not to place overhead power lines underground in order to improve performance measured as service reliability, health and safety, operation and maintenance cost, and impacts on property values.

AB - Performance measures are central to managing infrastructure assets, since they provide quantitative benchmarks and express values and preferences that are important for decision making. For example, one performance measure for decisions on upgrading an electrical power line is the improvement in service reliability, measured in terms of annual customer interruption hours. This paper first presents an overall framework for developing performance measures for infrastructure decision-making. The framework is then illustrated with an example that involves a decision of whether or not to place overhead power lines underground in order to improve performance measured as service reliability, health and safety, operation and maintenance cost, and impacts on property values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034775393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034775393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.435593

DO - 10.1117/12.435593

M3 - Article

VL - 4337

SP - 28

EP - 36

JO - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

JF - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

SN - 0277-786X

IS - 1

ER -