Perceptions of confidentiality protection at statistical agencies: Some evidence from data on businesses and households

Nick Greenia, Julia Lane, Diane Willimack

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of research into public perceptions of confidentiality. Statistical agencies expend a great deal of time and resources to protect the data that they collect from unauthorized disclosure and identification of individual responses. However, data protection, by its very nature, involves either reducing data quality or limiting access to the very information that statistical agencies go to so much trouble and expense to collect. Many statistical agencies know little about an important input into the data protection decision: the degree to which their own respondents - both businesses and households - understand and believe that statistical agencies have, in fact, delivered on their confidentiality promises and how such perceptions affect their responses. This paper provides a brief survey of the selected knowledge in the area. Results for the United States suggest that much work needs to be done to further this knowledge, and the paper argues that research into perceptions should be institutionalised by statistical agencies and used to inform data protection decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-314
Number of pages6
JournalStatistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Data privacy
Confidentiality
Industry
Disclosure
Data Quality
Limiting
Evidence
Business
Household
Data protection
Resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

@article{c16ab4b88e23402fa6941baae8d7de22,
title = "Perceptions of confidentiality protection at statistical agencies: Some evidence from data on businesses and households",
abstract = "This paper provides an overview of research into public perceptions of confidentiality. Statistical agencies expend a great deal of time and resources to protect the data that they collect from unauthorized disclosure and identification of individual responses. However, data protection, by its very nature, involves either reducing data quality or limiting access to the very information that statistical agencies go to so much trouble and expense to collect. Many statistical agencies know little about an important input into the data protection decision: the degree to which their own respondents - both businesses and households - understand and believe that statistical agencies have, in fact, delivered on their confidentiality promises and how such perceptions affect their responses. This paper provides a brief survey of the selected knowledge in the area. Results for the United States suggest that much work needs to be done to further this knowledge, and the paper argues that research into perceptions should be institutionalised by statistical agencies and used to inform data protection decisions.",
author = "Nick Greenia and Julia Lane and Diane Willimack",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "309--314",
journal = "Statistical Journal of the IAOS",
issn = "1874-7655",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of confidentiality protection at statistical agencies

T2 - Some evidence from data on businesses and households

AU - Greenia, Nick

AU - Lane, Julia

AU - Willimack, Diane

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This paper provides an overview of research into public perceptions of confidentiality. Statistical agencies expend a great deal of time and resources to protect the data that they collect from unauthorized disclosure and identification of individual responses. However, data protection, by its very nature, involves either reducing data quality or limiting access to the very information that statistical agencies go to so much trouble and expense to collect. Many statistical agencies know little about an important input into the data protection decision: the degree to which their own respondents - both businesses and households - understand and believe that statistical agencies have, in fact, delivered on their confidentiality promises and how such perceptions affect their responses. This paper provides a brief survey of the selected knowledge in the area. Results for the United States suggest that much work needs to be done to further this knowledge, and the paper argues that research into perceptions should be institutionalised by statistical agencies and used to inform data protection decisions.

AB - This paper provides an overview of research into public perceptions of confidentiality. Statistical agencies expend a great deal of time and resources to protect the data that they collect from unauthorized disclosure and identification of individual responses. However, data protection, by its very nature, involves either reducing data quality or limiting access to the very information that statistical agencies go to so much trouble and expense to collect. Many statistical agencies know little about an important input into the data protection decision: the degree to which their own respondents - both businesses and households - understand and believe that statistical agencies have, in fact, delivered on their confidentiality promises and how such perceptions affect their responses. This paper provides a brief survey of the selected knowledge in the area. Results for the United States suggest that much work needs to be done to further this knowledge, and the paper argues that research into perceptions should be institutionalised by statistical agencies and used to inform data protection decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035696453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035696453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0035696453

VL - 18

SP - 309

EP - 314

JO - Statistical Journal of the IAOS

JF - Statistical Journal of the IAOS

SN - 1874-7655

IS - 4

ER -