Patrolling borders

Hybrids, hierarchies and the challenge of mestizaje

Cristina Beltran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    "Hybridity" has become a popular concept among scholars of critical race theory and identity, particularly hose studying Chicano identity. Some scholars claim that hybridity - premised on multiplicity and fluidity - represents a new approach to subjectivity, challenging the idea of a stable and unified subject. In "Patrolling Borders," I argue that scholars are mistaken in their belief that "hybrid" or "bordered" identities are inherently transgressive or anti-essentialist. By constructing a genealogy of Chicano hybridity (i.e., mestizaje) I show how Chicano nationalists produced a politicized subjectivity during the Chicano Movement that emerged as the basis for recent notions of hybridity put forward by writers like Gloria Anzaldúa. By tracing the historical construction of mestizaje, I show how hybridity continues to be a discursive practice capable of comfortably coexisting with dreams of privileged knowledge, order, and wholeness.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)595-607
    Number of pages13
    JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
    Volume57
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Dec 2004

    Fingerprint

    subjectivity
    genealogy
    writer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Patrolling borders : Hybrids, hierarchies and the challenge of mestizaje. / Beltran, Cristina.

    In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4, 12.2004, p. 595-607.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{74c9cf414547458eb5bcb6f3c9514386,
    title = "Patrolling borders: Hybrids, hierarchies and the challenge of mestizaje",
    abstract = "{"}Hybridity{"} has become a popular concept among scholars of critical race theory and identity, particularly hose studying Chicano identity. Some scholars claim that hybridity - premised on multiplicity and fluidity - represents a new approach to subjectivity, challenging the idea of a stable and unified subject. In {"}Patrolling Borders,{"} I argue that scholars are mistaken in their belief that {"}hybrid{"} or {"}bordered{"} identities are inherently transgressive or anti-essentialist. By constructing a genealogy of Chicano hybridity (i.e., mestizaje) I show how Chicano nationalists produced a politicized subjectivity during the Chicano Movement that emerged as the basis for recent notions of hybridity put forward by writers like Gloria Anzald{\'u}a. By tracing the historical construction of mestizaje, I show how hybridity continues to be a discursive practice capable of comfortably coexisting with dreams of privileged knowledge, order, and wholeness.",
    author = "Cristina Beltran",
    year = "2004",
    month = "12",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "595--607",
    journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
    issn = "1065-9129",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Patrolling borders

    T2 - Hybrids, hierarchies and the challenge of mestizaje

    AU - Beltran, Cristina

    PY - 2004/12

    Y1 - 2004/12

    N2 - "Hybridity" has become a popular concept among scholars of critical race theory and identity, particularly hose studying Chicano identity. Some scholars claim that hybridity - premised on multiplicity and fluidity - represents a new approach to subjectivity, challenging the idea of a stable and unified subject. In "Patrolling Borders," I argue that scholars are mistaken in their belief that "hybrid" or "bordered" identities are inherently transgressive or anti-essentialist. By constructing a genealogy of Chicano hybridity (i.e., mestizaje) I show how Chicano nationalists produced a politicized subjectivity during the Chicano Movement that emerged as the basis for recent notions of hybridity put forward by writers like Gloria Anzaldúa. By tracing the historical construction of mestizaje, I show how hybridity continues to be a discursive practice capable of comfortably coexisting with dreams of privileged knowledge, order, and wholeness.

    AB - "Hybridity" has become a popular concept among scholars of critical race theory and identity, particularly hose studying Chicano identity. Some scholars claim that hybridity - premised on multiplicity and fluidity - represents a new approach to subjectivity, challenging the idea of a stable and unified subject. In "Patrolling Borders," I argue that scholars are mistaken in their belief that "hybrid" or "bordered" identities are inherently transgressive or anti-essentialist. By constructing a genealogy of Chicano hybridity (i.e., mestizaje) I show how Chicano nationalists produced a politicized subjectivity during the Chicano Movement that emerged as the basis for recent notions of hybridity put forward by writers like Gloria Anzaldúa. By tracing the historical construction of mestizaje, I show how hybridity continues to be a discursive practice capable of comfortably coexisting with dreams of privileged knowledge, order, and wholeness.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13544263557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13544263557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 57

    SP - 595

    EP - 607

    JO - Political Research Quarterly

    JF - Political Research Quarterly

    SN - 1065-9129

    IS - 4

    ER -