Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods: A randomized controlled trial

Francesca Gany, Jennifer Leng, Ephraim Shapiro, David Abramson, Ivette Motola, David C. Shield, Jyotsna Changrani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71%, U&C 64%, p <0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.18, scale 0-1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51%, U&C 38%, p <0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-318
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume22
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Randomized Controlled Trials
Language
Communication Barriers
Privacy
Communication
Municipal Hospitals
Physicians
Urban Hospitals
Hospital Emergency Service
Linear Models
Primary Health Care
Regression Analysis
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Growth
Population

Keywords

  • Immigrant health
  • Language
  • Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods : A randomized controlled trial. / Gany, Francesca; Leng, Jennifer; Shapiro, Ephraim; Abramson, David; Motola, Ivette; Shield, David C.; Changrani, Jyotsna.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 22, No. SUPPL. 2, 11.2007, p. 312-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gany, Francesca ; Leng, Jennifer ; Shapiro, Ephraim ; Abramson, David ; Motola, Ivette ; Shield, David C. ; Changrani, Jyotsna. / Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods : A randomized controlled trial. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 22, No. SUPPL. 2. pp. 312-318.
@article{601cf02c7df2489ea0e55eb67610228a,
title = "Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71{\%}, U&C 64{\%}, p <0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95{\%} CI 0.02-0.18, scale 0-1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51{\%}, U&C 38{\%}, p <0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care.",
keywords = "Immigrant health, Language, Satisfaction",
author = "Francesca Gany and Jennifer Leng and Ephraim Shapiro and David Abramson and Ivette Motola and Shield, {David C.} and Jyotsna Changrani",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "312--318",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Gany, Francesca

AU - Leng, Jennifer

AU - Shapiro, Ephraim

AU - Abramson, David

AU - Motola, Ivette

AU - Shield, David C.

AU - Changrani, Jyotsna

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71%, U&C 64%, p <0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.18, scale 0-1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51%, U&C 38%, p <0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care.

AB - BACKGROUND: Growth of the foreign-born population in the U.S. has led to increasing numbers of limited-English-proficient (LEP) patients. Innovative medical interpreting strategies, including remote simultaneous medical interpreting (RSMI), have arisen to address the language barrier. This study evaluates the impact of interpreting method on patient satisfaction. METHODS: 1,276 English-, Spanish-, Mandarin-, and Cantonese-speaking patients attending the primary care clinic and emergency department of a large New York City municipal hospital were screened for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial. Language-discordant patients were randomized to RSMI or usual and customary (U&C) interpreting. Patients with language-concordant providers received usual care. Demographic and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered to all participants. RESULTS: 541 patients were language-concordant with their providers and not randomized; 371 were randomized to RSMI, 167 of whom were exposed to RSMI; and 364 were randomized to U&C, 198 of whom were exposed to U&C. Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely than those with U&C to think doctors treated them with respect (RSMI 71%, U&C 64%, p <0.05), but they did not differ in other measures of physician communication/care. In a linear regression analysis, exposure to RSMI was significantly associated with an increase in overall satisfaction with physician communication/care (β 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.18, scale 0-1.0). Patients randomized to RSMI were more likely to think the interpreting method protected their privacy (RSMI 51%, U&C 38%, p <0.05). Patients randomized to either arm of interpretation reported less comprehension and satisfaction than patients in language-concordant encounters. CONCLUSIONS: While not a substitute for language-concordant providers, RSMI can improve patient satisfaction and privacy among LEP patients. Implementing RSMI should be considered an important component of a multipronged approach to addressing language barriers in health care.

KW - Immigrant health

KW - Language

KW - Satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448941578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448941578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8

DO - 10.1007/s11606-007-0360-8

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 312

EP - 318

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -